Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] of: Pass GPIO label down to gpiod_request when using get_gpiod_from_child

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

Hi Linus,

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Alexander Stein
> <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently all users of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() have no way to specify a
>> label for the GPIO. So GPIOs listed in debugfs are shown with label "?".
>> With this change a proper label is used.
>> Also adjust all users so they can pass a label, properly retrieved from
>> device tree properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
>> CC: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> CC: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> * Non-RFC
>> * This patch is rebased on gpio/for-next branch and cherry-picked commit
>> 2715bbe from https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux.git
>
> Patch applied on top of Andy's patch.
>
> Let's see if this all builds and works :)

Yes it does, thanks!

-gpio-780 (?): gpiod_set_debounce: missing set() or set_debounce() operations
+gpio-780 (SW30): gpiod_set_debounce: missing set() or set_debounce() operations

Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds