From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: signedness bug in cma3000_thread_irq()
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:17:02 -0500
Message-ID: <F920F5EE-FA61-4FFC-948C-97D6834823B6@gmail.com>
References: <1323672566-16738-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> <12775.1323916035@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <ECD4A42B-AC97-417B-99CA-3856B5DAFAC6@gmail.com> <3797.1323919260@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:37573 "EHLO
	mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756377Ab1LOWRT (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-input@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:17:19 -0500
In-Reply-To: <3797.1323919260@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> No, the variable that used to be a u8 - was it 8 bits wide for a reason?

The return value of CMA3000_READ?  I don't see any particular reason.  

- xi