From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarod Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] linux infrared remote control drivers Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:41:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200910200956.33391.jarod@redhat.com> <20091104223136.62cfc791@pedra.chehab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from static-72-93-233-3.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([72.93.233.3]:43516 "EHLO mail.wilsonet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751365AbZKEDlW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:41:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091104223136.62cfc791@pedra.chehab.org> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jarod Wilson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Janne Grunau , Christoph Bartelmus On Nov 4, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 4 Nov 2009 17:56:31 -0500 > Jarod Wilson escreveu: > >> On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> >>> This here is a second go at submitting linux infrared remote control >>> (lirc) drivers for kernel inclusion, with a much smaller patch set >>> that >>> includes only the core lirc driver and two device drivers, all three >>> of >>> which have been heavily updated since the last submission, based on >>> feedback received. >> >> Hm. Submitting this while the vast majority of people who might >> review >> it were at the Japan Linux Symposium seems like it might have been a >> bad idea. > > True :) Such long trips generally affects the week before (to finish > some > pending stuff before traveling) and the week after, where we have a > big > backlog to handle. > >> Or does no feedback mean its all good and ready to be >> merged? ;) > > They are on my queue. I was handling a long pile of patches for the > existing > drivers during last week. I intend to send the fixes upstream during > this week, > and then going to analyze the lirc patches. I'd heard as much, but figured I should go ahead with the fishing expedition just the same to see if we couldn't hook anyone else too... > It would be wonderful to get also some feedback from the event/input > people. Yeah, I think that's probably the folks who really have the final say on this, as we're ultimately (mostly) input devices. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@wilsonet.com