[PATCH] Input: stmpe-ts - drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST

[PATCH] Input: stmpe-ts - drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST

[Jean Delvare]

Since commit 0166dc11be91 ("of: make CONFIG_OF user selectable"), it
is possible to test-build any driver which depends on OF on any
architecture by explicitly selecting OF. Therefore depending on
COMPILE_TEST as an alternative is no longer needed.

It is actually better to always build such drivers with OF enabled,
so that the test builds are closer to how each driver will actually be
built on its intended target. Building them without OF may not test
much as the compiler will optimize out potentially large parts of the
code. In the worst case, this could even pop false positive warnings.
Dropping COMPILE_TEST here improves the quality of our testing and
avoids wasting time on non-existent issues.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-6.0.orig/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
+++ linux-6.0/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
@@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_STMFTS
 config TOUCHSCREEN_STMPE
 	tristate "STMicroelectronics STMPE touchscreens"
 	depends on MFD_STMPE
-	depends on (OF || COMPILE_TEST)
+	depends on OF
 	help
 	  Say Y here if you want support for STMicroelectronics
 	  STMPE touchscreen controllers.


-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

Re: [PATCH] Input: stmpe-ts - drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:52:03PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Since commit 0166dc11be91 ("of: make CONFIG_OF user selectable"), it
> is possible to test-build any driver which depends on OF on any
> architecture by explicitly selecting OF. Therefore depending on
> COMPILE_TEST as an alternative is no longer needed.
> 
> It is actually better to always build such drivers with OF enabled,
> so that the test builds are closer to how each driver will actually be
> built on its intended target. Building them without OF may not test
> much as the compiler will optimize out potentially large parts of the
> code. In the worst case, this could even pop false positive warnings.
> Dropping COMPILE_TEST here improves the quality of our testing and
> avoids wasting time on non-existent issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Applied, thank you.

-- 
Dmitry