Re: [RERESEND PATCH v3] Input: sun4i-lradc-keys - Add wakup support

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:30:13PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> From: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>
> 
> Allow the driver to wake the system on key press if the "wakeup-source"
> property is provided in the device tree. Using the LRADC as a wakeup
> source requires keeping the AVCC domain active during sleep. Since this
> has a nontrivial impact on power consumption (sometimes doubling it),
> disable the LRADC wakeup source by default.
> 
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes since resend v3:
>   - An entirely different, but equivalent, DT binding patch was merged,
>     so there is only one patch left...
> 
> Changes since v2:
>   - Dropped unnecessary pr_err in platform_get_irq() error path
>   - Dropped patch 3 (DT update) as it was merged
>   - Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags
> 
> Changes since v1:
>   - Add requisite DT binding change
>   - Only add wakeup capability if "wakeup-source" is present
>   - Warn but do not error out if setting the wake IRQ fails
>   - Add "wakeup-source" property to PinePhone device tree
> 
> ---
>  drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> index 4a796bed48ac..af1683d68c8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_wakeup.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
> @@ -226,8 +228,7 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	int i;
> -	int error;
> +	int error, i, irq;
>  
>  	lradc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sun4i_lradc_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!lradc)
> @@ -272,8 +273,11 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (IS_ERR(lradc->base))
>  		return PTR_ERR(lradc->base);
>  
> -	error = devm_request_irq(dev, platform_get_irq(pdev, 0),
> -				 sun4i_lradc_irq, 0,
> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0)
> +		return irq;
> +
> +	error = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, sun4i_lradc_irq, 0,
>  				 "sun4i-a10-lradc-keys", lradc);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> @@ -282,6 +286,14 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
>  
> +	if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "wakeup-source")) {
> +		device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
> +
> +		error = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq);
> +		if (error)
> +			dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set wake IRQ\n");

Should we make it

		else
			device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);

?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry