From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A0EC433F5 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 05:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2B66126A for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 05:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243233AbhKRF65 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:58:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40318 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243237AbhKRF6u (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:58:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD87C061766; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id s138so4390920pgs.4; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:55:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=H8bNW+/3U4emAhklg4BSuX8zNKroe2K7jyAYYwHKqm4=; b=mg3XzZdbe7EcdZZtXLojwHiBR6uWTSvFY9ntHbhfEGw7cOVLLhR7iq2jHlKjYvZKje tE98js5JX9B6xqseBuRndexsGHMMuU3ADEDlh5H+HXgIHthM6leIFNy7PjWvB+41wDCY Fw0EYqNAn3Zoep9Guk6z59BfYRGIufh7KG6fajD72OY0h62Di+Q14hviUQbzYjJzFJWv 2dFsxxpuCFs/oNzXPT1S4WqVgrzvvcfCPlTD+yX2NnbtnO4UB7ulEOKr9yTK0ylpw1Yn zw7oT68jRtVyd/Bpj5yWFVXwEA7JEysMP4L8wqZ/fabFYwGG8LnV28erijgAGOcQ+Jxp H2hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=H8bNW+/3U4emAhklg4BSuX8zNKroe2K7jyAYYwHKqm4=; b=j6fDnZQKzkBaZXgPlCEfxn2Q8OdMybnKh2Cyx+Tn+gxn6iLMBSBEvbBS9vuiJBrI0k OGKewbU6mO+mS5PqmM+fE3hzgndKo+wtZwepL6rqV0XEeEJXWhb/GmjKPTfqTPzZ/eBd 0k2K90WO7mZ4XdZQoDXxyZIaXqV5nxxMRkmAZvmBLResXglo3J1Bptn7Cg9gbGuJpMy1 gAE6iCGxAyyZVYffANpdw+LtWfUw3JlPpv/tzc7oYQqQo/LkpTPLgg9VUNbuSq1bA2lK NdMLd4FZuYt0NsS0yzDK+0fQ2RU8v0Iu/3mLQMUc9IeWHZjvKo26AkTEPSv8SYKSEmzl HKxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D3kfgzCF3SurHDwe5KlrZCllS/JOC93ByyaNj8agp1aUaSGHa I2CgCnyjhwzKC/ASk88rYBc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0bmOuMEiQB/QKzFcS3+3GEWN0C50DyDQSp5zYyw2lNe4d9dYFO/p2JPM66iyRTU1smPLeIg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b502:: with SMTP id y2mr9363870pge.214.1637214949470; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:202:201:e863:bb5d:673b:3a6d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm1502726pfu.203.2021.11.17.21.55.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:55:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:55:45 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Samuel Holland Cc: Hans de Goede , Rob Herring , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, Ondrej Jirman Subject: Re: [RERESEND PATCH v3] Input: sun4i-lradc-keys - Add wakup support Message-ID: References: <20211118033013.43116-1-samuel@sholland.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211118033013.43116-1-samuel@sholland.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:30:13PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote: > From: Ondrej Jirman > > Allow the driver to wake the system on key press if the "wakeup-source" > property is provided in the device tree. Using the LRADC as a wakeup > source requires keeping the AVCC domain active during sleep. Since this > has a nontrivial impact on power consumption (sometimes doubling it), > disable the LRADC wakeup source by default. > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland > --- > > Changes since resend v3: > - An entirely different, but equivalent, DT binding patch was merged, > so there is only one patch left... > > Changes since v2: > - Dropped unnecessary pr_err in platform_get_irq() error path > - Dropped patch 3 (DT update) as it was merged > - Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags > > Changes since v1: > - Add requisite DT binding change > - Only add wakeup capability if "wakeup-source" is present > - Warn but do not error out if setting the wake IRQ fails > - Add "wakeup-source" property to PinePhone device tree > > --- > drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c > index 4a796bed48ac..af1683d68c8c 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/sun4i-lradc-keys.c > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -226,8 +228,7 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct sun4i_lradc_data *lradc; > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > - int i; > - int error; > + int error, i, irq; > > lradc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sun4i_lradc_data), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!lradc) > @@ -272,8 +273,11 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (IS_ERR(lradc->base)) > return PTR_ERR(lradc->base); > > - error = devm_request_irq(dev, platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), > - sun4i_lradc_irq, 0, > + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + if (irq < 0) > + return irq; > + > + error = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, sun4i_lradc_irq, 0, > "sun4i-a10-lradc-keys", lradc); > if (error) > return error; > @@ -282,6 +286,14 @@ static int sun4i_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (error) > return error; > > + if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "wakeup-source")) { > + device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true); > + > + error = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, irq); > + if (error) > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set wake IRQ\n"); Should we make it else device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true); ? Thanks. -- Dmitry