From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu <hywu@google.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: misc - atmel_captouch does not depend on OF
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:54:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzuuiJwdtnHYQK1G@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221003172953.30354439@endymion.delvare>
Hi Jean,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 05:29:53PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> The atmel_captouch driver does not actually depend on OF, it includes
> a non-OF device ID which could be used to instantiate the device, and
> the driver code is already prepared to be built with or without OF. So
> drop the unneeded dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Cc: Daniel Hung-yu Wu <hywu@google.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
> The problem I'm trying to solve here is that "depends on OF ||
> COMPILE_TEST" does not make sense since OF can now be enabled on all
> architectures. One way to fix this is by removing the dependency
> altogether (this patch).
>
> If the driver is known to be needed only on OF-enabled systems then we
> could leave the dependency on OF and only drop COMPILE_TEST (and
> simplify the driver code accordingly). I have an alternative patch
> doing that already. Tell me what you prefer, I'm fine either way.
The driver is not operable on systems without OF:
static int atmel_captouch_probe(...
...
node = dev->of_node;
if (!node) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to find matching node in device tree\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (of_property_read_bool(node, "autorepeat"))
So the reason for "depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST" is to avoid prompting
users who actually try to configure real systems for drivers that make
no sense for them while still allowing people interested in compile
coverage to select COMPILE_TEST and enable more drivers.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-04 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-03 15:29 [PATCH] Input: misc - atmel_captouch does not depend on OF Jean Delvare
2022-10-04 3:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2022-10-04 5:44 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzuuiJwdtnHYQK1G@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hywu@google.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).