From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] gpiolib: use a mutex to protect the list of GPIO devices
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 13:06:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zaw1ux7eTogP-DQi@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7b5ff1e-8f34-4d98-a7be-b826cb897dc8@moroto.mountain>
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 11:50:52AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Bartosz Golaszewski,
>
> The patch 65a828bab158: "gpiolib: use a mutex to protect the list of
> GPIO devices" from Dec 15, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the following
> Smatch static checker warning:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c:2836 ath9k_hw_gpio_get()
> warn: sleeping in atomic context
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
> 2826 val = MS_REG_READ(AR9285, gpio);
> 2827 else if (AR_SREV_9280(ah))
> 2828 val = MS_REG_READ(AR928X, gpio);
> 2829 else if (AR_DEVID_7010(ah))
> 2830 val = REG_READ(ah, AR7010_GPIO_IN) & BIT(gpio);
> 2831 else if (AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah))
> 2832 val = REG_READ(ah, AR_GPIO_IN(ah)) & BIT(gpio);
> 2833 else
> 2834 val = MS_REG_READ(AR, gpio);
> 2835 } else if (BIT(gpio) & ah->caps.gpio_requested) {
> --> 2836 val = gpio_get_value(gpio) & BIT(gpio);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> 2837 } else {
> 2838 WARN_ON(1);
> 2839 }
> 2840
> 2841 return !!val;
> 2842 }
>
> Before gpio_get_value() took a spinlock but now it takes a mutex
> (actually a rw semaphor now). The call tree where we are in atomic
> context is:
>
> ath_btcoex_period_timer() <- disables preempt
> -> ath_detect_bt_priority()
> -> ath9k_hw_gpio_get()
>
> Another warning this change causes is:
>
> drivers/input/keyboard/matrix_keypad.c:95 enable_row_irqs() warn: sleeping in atomic context
> matrix_keypad_scan() <- disables preempt
> -> enable_row_irqs()
>
> drivers/input/keyboard/matrix_keypad.c:108 disable_row_irqs() warn: sleeping in atomic context
> matrix_keypad_interrupt() <- disables preempt
> -> disable_row_irqs()
Now that that operation becomes heavier we should convert row GPIOs into
interrupt numbers in probe() and then this issue will go away.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-20 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 8:50 [bug report] gpiolib: use a mutex to protect the list of GPIO devices Dan Carpenter
2024-01-15 9:18 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-01-20 21:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zaw1ux7eTogP-DQi@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox