* [PATCH 5/10] Input: adp5588-keys - added a check key_val
@ 2024-09-19 14:29 Denis Arefev
2024-09-19 14:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Denis Arefev @ 2024-09-19 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Michael Hennerich, Dmitry Torokhov, linux-input, linux-kernel,
lvc-project
No upstream commit exists for this commit.
If the adp5588_read function returns 0, then there will be an
overflow of the kpad->keycode[key_val - 1] buffer.
If the adp5588_read function returns a negative value, then the
logic is broken - the wrong value is used as an index of
the kpad->keycode array.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 69a4af606ed4 ("Input: adp5588-keys - support GPI events for ADP5588 devices")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
---
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
index 90a59b973d00..19be8054eb5f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
@@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ static void adp5588_report_events(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad, int ev_cnt)
int key = adp5588_read(kpad->client, Key_EVENTA + i);
int key_val = key & KEY_EV_MASK;
+ if (key_val <= 0)
+ continue;
if (key_val >= GPI_PIN_BASE && key_val <= GPI_PIN_END) {
for (j = 0; j < kpad->gpimapsize; j++) {
if (key_val == kpad->gpimap[j].pin) {
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5/10] Input: adp5588-keys - added a check key_val
2024-09-19 14:29 [PATCH 5/10] Input: adp5588-keys - added a check key_val Denis Arefev
@ 2024-09-19 14:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2024-09-19 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Arefev
Cc: stable, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Michael Hennerich, linux-input,
linux-kernel, lvc-project
Hi Denis,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 05:29:14PM +0300, Denis Arefev wrote:
> No upstream commit exists for this commit.
Sorry, what does this mean?
>
> If the adp5588_read function returns 0, then there will be an
> overflow of the kpad->keycode[key_val - 1] buffer.
>
> If the adp5588_read function returns a negative value, then the
> logic is broken - the wrong value is used as an index of
> the kpad->keycode array.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 69a4af606ed4 ("Input: adp5588-keys - support GPI events for ADP5588 devices")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> index 90a59b973d00..19be8054eb5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> @@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ static void adp5588_report_events(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad, int ev_cnt)
> int key = adp5588_read(kpad->client, Key_EVENTA + i);
> int key_val = key & KEY_EV_MASK;
>
> + if (key_val <= 0)
> + continue;
We should be checking the original value (key) and not masked value.
Masked value will never be negative.
int key, key_vali, key_press;
key = adp5588_read(kpad->client, Key_EVENTA + i);
if (key < 0)
continue;
key_val = key & key & KEY_EV_MASK;
key_press = key & KEY_EV_PRESSED;
if (key_val >= GPI_PIN_BASE && key_val <= GPI_PIN_END) {
...
} else if (key_val > 0) {
...
}
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-19 14:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-19 14:29 [PATCH 5/10] Input: adp5588-keys - added a check key_val Denis Arefev
2024-09-19 14:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).