Re: [PATCH 02/17] HID: logitech-hidpp: Add scope to battery

[Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>]

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

> > > Without a scope defined, UPower assumes that the battery is provide
> > > power to the computer it's connected to, like a laptop battery or a UPS.
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > index 4eeb550..4aaf237 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static int hidpp20_battery_event(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> > >  static enum power_supply_property hidpp_battery_props[] = {
> > >  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> > >  	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> > > +	POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE,
> > 
> > Actually, what is the code baseline for this patchset please? I don't 
> > think I've ever seen hidpp_battery_props[] before.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I should have mentioned this was on top of your
> for-4.8/logitech-hidpp-battery (merged with for-next, but which was put
> on hold since last Summer).

Ah, so I *did* see it, but forgot :) Thanks.

I'll look at the patchset in proper context now.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs