Hello,

On Sun, Aug 16, 2026 at 05:39:47AM +0000, Farber, Eliav wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 10:17:36AM +0000, Eliav Farber wrote:
> > >  int devm_uniwill_wmi_register_notifier(struct device *dev, struct 
> > > notifier_block *nb)  {
> > > -	int ret;
> > > -
> > > -	ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&uniwill_wmi_chain_head, nb);
> > > -	if (ret < 0)
> > > -		return ret;
> > > -
> > > -	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_uniwill_wmi_unregister_notifier, nb);
> > > +	return devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register(dev,
> > > +						     &uniwill_wmi_chain_head,
> > > +						     nb);
> > >  }
> >
> > I'd remove this function and replace calls to it directly by devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register().
> 
> uniwill_wmi_chain_head is static in uniwill-wmi.c and the caller is in
> uniwill-acpi.c. The wrapper encapsulates access to this module-private
> notifier head - removing it would require exposing the variable through
> the header, which breaks the current abstraction.
> 
> I'd prefer to keep the wrapper as-is.

Sounds like a good justification, thanks for considering my suggestion.

Uwe