Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: goodix: Poll the 'buffer status' bit before reading data
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:18:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6ecb1aaa46370727a565e76c6d5925c@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170330224800.GA15258@dtor-ws>

Hi,

Le 2017-03-31 00:48, Dmitry Torokhov a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:33:49PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> The Goodix panel triggers an interrupt on touch events. However, its
>> registers will contain the valid values a short time after the
>> interrupt, and not when it's raised. At that moment, the 'buffer 
>> status'
>> bit is set.
> 
> Yay for awesome hardware.
> 
>> 
>> Previously, if the 'buffer status' bit was not set when the registers
>> were read, the data was discarded and no input event was emitted,
>> causing "finger down" or "finger up" events to be missed sometimes.
>> 
>> This went unnoticed until v4.9, as the DesignWare I2C driver commonly
>> used with this driver had enough latency for that bug to never 
>> trigger.
>> 
>> Now, in the IRQ handler we will poll (with a timeout) the 'buffer 
>> status'
>> bit and process the data of the panel as soon as this bit gets set.
>> 
>> Note that the Goodix panel will send a few spurious interrupts after 
>> the
>> 'finger up' event, in which the 'buffer status' bit will never be set.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
>> ---
>>  drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c | 30 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c 
>> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
>> index 240b16f3ee97..7a8b89b87c2f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
>> @@ -195,18 +195,34 @@ static int goodix_get_cfg_len(u16 id)
>> 
>>  static int goodix_ts_read_input_report(struct goodix_ts_data *ts, u8 
>> *data)
>>  {
>> +	unsigned int timeout = 100;
>>  	int touch_num;
>>  	int error;
>> 
>> -	error = goodix_i2c_read(ts->client, GOODIX_READ_COOR_ADDR, data,
>> +	/* The 'buffer status' bit, which indicates that the data is valid, 
>> is
>> +	 * not set as soon as the interrupt is raised, but slightly after.
>> +	 */
>> +	do {
>> +		error = goodix_i2c_read(ts->client, GOODIX_READ_COOR_ADDR, data,
>>  				GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE + 1);
>> -	if (error) {
>> -		dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "I2C transfer error: %d\n", error);
>> -		return error;
>> -	}
>> +		if (error) {
>> +			dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "I2C transfer error: %d\n",
>> +					error);
>> +			return error;
>> +		}
>> 
>> -	if (!(data[0] & 0x80))
>> -		return -EAGAIN;
>> +		if (data[0] & 0x80)
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		usleep_range(100, 200);
> 
> What is the typical delay between IRQ and data being ready? 100 repeats
> suggest that poll interval is too small.
> 

On my panel it seems to be about 10ms - which sounds like a *huge* lot 
of time...

>> +	} while (--timeout);
>> +
>> +	if (!timeout) {
>> +		/* The Goodix panel will send spurious interrupts after a
>> +		 * 'finger up' event, which will always cause a timeout.
>> +		 */
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> 
>>  	touch_num = data[0] & 0x0f;
>>  	if (touch_num > ts->max_touch_num)
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>> 
> 
> Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-31 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-30 13:33 [PATCH] input: goodix: Poll the 'buffer status' bit before reading data Paul Cercueil
2017-03-30 22:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-31 10:18   ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2017-06-19 22:41 ` Bastien Nocera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b6ecb1aaa46370727a565e76c6d5925c@crapouillou.net \
    --to=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox