[PATCH v2 00/16] Introduce PMF Smart PC Solution Builder Feature

[PATCH v2 00/16] Introduce PMF Smart PC Solution Builder Feature

[Shyam Sundar S K]

Smart PC Solutions Builder allows for OEM to define a large number of
custom system states to dynamically switch to. The system states are
referred to as policies, and multiple policies can be loaded onto the
system at any given time, however only one policy can be active at a
given time.

Policy is a combination of PMF input and output capabilities. The inputs
are the incoming information from the other kernel subsystems like LID
state, Sensor info, GPU info etc and the actions are the updating the 
power limits of SMU etc.

The policy binary is signed and encrypted by a special key from AMD. This
policy binary shall have the inputs and outputs which the OEMs can build
for the platform customization that can enhance the user experience and
system behavior.

This series adds the initial support for Smart PC solution to PMF driver.

Note that, on platforms where CnQF and Smart PC is advertised, Smart PC
shall have higher precedence and same applies for Auto Mode.

V1->v2:
---------
- Remove __func__ macros
- Remove manual function names inside prints
- Handle tee_shm_get_va() failure
- Remove double _
- Add meaningful prints
- pass amd_pmf_set_dram_addr() failure errors
- Add more information to commit messages
- use right format specifiers
- use devm_ioremap() instead of ioremap()
- address unsigned long vs u32 problems
- Fix lkp reported issues
- Add amd_pmf_remove_pb() to remove the debugfs files created(if any).
- Make amd_pmf_open_pb() as static.
- Add cooling device APIs for controlling amdgpu backlight
- handle amd_pmf_apply_policies() failures
- Split v1 14/15 into 2 patches further
- use linux/units.h for better handling
- add "depends on" AMD_SFH_HID for interaction with SFH
- other cosmetic remarks

Basavaraj Natikar (3):
  HID: amd_sfh: rename float_to_int() to amd_sfh_float_to_int()
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDSFH interface for HPD
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDSFH interface for ALS

Shyam Sundar S K (13):
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF TEE interface
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support PMF-TA interaction
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Change return type of amd_pmf_set_dram_addr()
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: change amd_pmf_init_features() call sequence
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to get inputs from other subsystems
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support update p3t limit
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to update system state
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add facility to dump TA inputs
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add capability to sideload of policy binary
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: dump policy binary data
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDGPU get interface
  platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDGPU set interface

 Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst           |   1 +
 Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst             |  25 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile           |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h           |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c       | 154 ++++++
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h      |   6 +
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c |  22 +-
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c |  17 +
 .../amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c    |  48 ++
 .../amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.h    |   1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig          |   3 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile         |   3 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c           |  37 ++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c           |  52 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h            | 201 +++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c            | 197 +++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c            |   2 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c         | 515 ++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h                    |  55 ++
 19 files changed, 1317 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 01/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF TEE interface

[Shyam Sundar S K]

AMD PMF driver loads the PMF TA (Trusted Application) into the AMD
ASP's (AMD Security Processor) TEE (Trusted Execution Environment).

PMF Trusted Application is a secured firmware placed under
/lib/firmware/amdtee gets loaded only when the TEE environment is
initialized. Add the initial code path to build these pipes.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   3 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  11 ++-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  16 ++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
index fdededf54392..d2746ee7369f 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
@@ -6,4 +6,5 @@
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
 amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
-		auto-mode.o cnqf.o
+		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
+		tee-if.o
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
index 78ed3ee22555..68f1389dda3e 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
@@ -309,8 +309,11 @@ static void amd_pmf_init_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "SPS enabled and Platform Profiles registered\n");
 	}
 
-	/* Enable Auto Mode */
-	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
+	if (amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev)) {
+		/* Enable Smart PC Solution builder */
+		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
+	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
+		/* Enable Auto Mode */
 		amd_pmf_init_auto_mode(dev);
 		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Auto Mode Init done\n");
 	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
@@ -330,7 +333,9 @@ static void amd_pmf_deinit_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		amd_pmf_deinit_sps(dev);
 	}
 
-	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
+	if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
+		amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(dev);
+	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
 		amd_pmf_deinit_auto_mode(dev);
 	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
 			  is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_DC)) {
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index deba88e6e4c8..02460c2a31ea 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
 	bool cnqf_enabled;
 	bool cnqf_supported;
 	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
+	/* Smart PC solution builder */
+	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
+	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
+	u32 session_id;
+	void *shbuf;
+	bool smart_pc_enabled;
 };
 
 struct apmf_sps_prop_granular {
@@ -389,6 +395,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
 	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
 } __packed;
 
+struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
+	int command_id;
+	int resp_id;
+	u32 pmf_result;
+	u32 if_version;
+};
+
 /* Core Layer */
 int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
 void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
@@ -433,4 +446,7 @@ void amd_pmf_deinit_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 int amd_pmf_trans_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int socket_power, ktime_t time_lapsed_ms);
 extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
 
+/* Smart PC builder Layer*/
+int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
+void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 #endif /* PMF_H */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4db80ca59a11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - TEE Interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
+#include <linux/uuid.h>
+#include "pmf.h"
+
+#define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
+static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
+						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
+
+static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
+{
+	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_ta_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *id)
+{
+	struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg = {};
+	int rc;
+
+	export_uuid(sess_arg.uuid, &amd_pmf_ta_uuid);
+	sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_PUBLIC;
+	sess_arg.num_params = 0;
+
+	rc = tee_client_open_session(ctx, &sess_arg, NULL);
+	if (rc < 0 || sess_arg.ret != 0) {
+		pr_err("Failed to open TEE session err:%#x, ret:%#x\n", sess_arg.ret, rc);
+		rc = -EINVAL;
+	} else {
+		*id = sess_arg.session;
+	}
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_tee_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	int ret;
+	u32 size;
+
+	/* Open context with TEE driver */
+	dev->tee_ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match, NULL, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(dev->tee_ctx)) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to open TEE context\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(dev->tee_ctx);
+	}
+
+	/* Open session with PMF Trusted App */
+	ret = amd_pmf_ta_open_session(dev->tee_ctx, &dev->session_id);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to open TA session (%d)\n", ret);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_ctx;
+	}
+
+	size = sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory);
+	dev->fw_shm_pool = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(dev->tee_ctx, size);
+	if (IS_ERR(dev->fw_shm_pool)) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to alloc TEE shared memory\n");
+		ret = PTR_ERR(dev->fw_shm_pool);
+		goto out_sess;
+	}
+
+	dev->shbuf = tee_shm_get_va(dev->fw_shm_pool, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(dev->shbuf)) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to get TEE virtual address\n");
+		ret = PTR_ERR(dev->shbuf);
+		goto out_shm;
+	}
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "TEE init done\n");
+
+	return 0;
+
+out_shm:
+	tee_shm_free(dev->fw_shm_pool);
+out_sess:
+	tee_client_close_session(dev->tee_ctx, dev->session_id);
+out_ctx:
+	tee_client_close_context(dev->tee_ctx);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void amd_pmf_tee_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	/* Free the shared memory pool */
+	tee_shm_free(dev->fw_shm_pool);
+
+	/* close the existing session with PMF TA*/
+	tee_client_close_session(dev->tee_ctx, dev->session_id);
+
+	/* close the context with TEE driver */
+	tee_client_close_context(dev->tee_ctx);
+}
+
+int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	return amd_pmf_tee_init(dev);
+}
+
+void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev);
+}
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF TEE interface

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> AMD PMF driver loads the PMF TA (Trusted Application) into the AMD
> ASP's (AMD Security Processor) TEE (Trusted Execution Environment).
> 
> PMF Trusted Application is a secured firmware placed under
> /lib/firmware/amdtee gets loaded only when the TEE environment is
> initialized. Add the initial code path to build these pipes.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   3 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  11 ++-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  16 ++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> index fdededf54392..d2746ee7369f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> @@ -6,4 +6,5 @@
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
> -		auto-mode.o cnqf.o
> +		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
> +		tee-if.o
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> index 78ed3ee22555..68f1389dda3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> @@ -309,8 +309,11 @@ static void amd_pmf_init_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "SPS enabled and Platform Profiles registered\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Enable Auto Mode */
> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> +	if (amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev)) {
> +		/* Enable Smart PC Solution builder */
> +		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> +		/* Enable Auto Mode */

I'm pretty certain neither of these two comments add any information to 
what's readily visible from the code itself so they can be dropped.

>  		amd_pmf_init_auto_mode(dev);
>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Auto Mode Init done\n");
>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
> @@ -330,7 +333,9 @@ static void amd_pmf_deinit_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  		amd_pmf_deinit_sps(dev);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> +	if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
> +		amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(dev);
> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>  		amd_pmf_deinit_auto_mode(dev);
>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
>  			  is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_DC)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index deba88e6e4c8..02460c2a31ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>  	bool cnqf_enabled;
>  	bool cnqf_supported;
>  	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
> +	/* Smart PC solution builder */
> +	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
> +	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
> +	u32 session_id;
> +	void *shbuf;
> +	bool smart_pc_enabled;
>  };
>  
>  struct apmf_sps_prop_granular {
> @@ -389,6 +395,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
> +	int command_id;
> +	int resp_id;
> +	u32 pmf_result;
> +	u32 if_version;
> +};
> +
>  /* Core Layer */
>  int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>  void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
> @@ -433,4 +446,7 @@ void amd_pmf_deinit_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  int amd_pmf_trans_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int socket_power, ktime_t time_lapsed_ms);
>  extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>  
> +/* Smart PC builder Layer*/

Missing space.

> +int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
> +void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  #endif /* PMF_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4db80ca59a11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - TEE Interface
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + * All Rights Reserved.
> + *
> + * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> +#include "pmf.h"
> +
> +#define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
> +static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
> +						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
> +{
> +	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_ta_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *id)
> +{
> +	struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg = {};
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	export_uuid(sess_arg.uuid, &amd_pmf_ta_uuid);
> +	sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_PUBLIC;
> +	sess_arg.num_params = 0;
> +
> +	rc = tee_client_open_session(ctx, &sess_arg, NULL);
> +	if (rc < 0 || sess_arg.ret != 0) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to open TEE session err:%#x, ret:%#x\n", sess_arg.ret, rc);

Print normal -Exx error codes as %d, not %x (rc). I don't know what would 
be best to do with sess_arg.ret, TEEC_ERROR_* look like errnos (negative 
values) manually converted into u32.

> +		rc = -EINVAL;

If rc < 0, I think you should just pass the error code on.

> +	} else {
> +		*id = sess_arg.session;
> +	}
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_tee_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 size;
> +
> +	/* Open context with TEE driver */

Too obvious comment to stay, it's what the code already says on the next 
line so there's little point to repeat something this obvious in the 
comments.

> +	dev->tee_ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match, NULL, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dev->tee_ctx)) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to open TEE context\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(dev->tee_ctx);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Open session with PMF Trusted App */

Remove this one too.

> +	ret = amd_pmf_ta_open_session(dev->tee_ctx, &dev->session_id);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to open TA session (%d)\n", ret);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_ctx;
> +	}
> +
> +	size = sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory);
> +	dev->fw_shm_pool = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(dev->tee_ctx, size);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dev->fw_shm_pool)) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to alloc TEE shared memory\n");
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(dev->fw_shm_pool);
> +		goto out_sess;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev->shbuf = tee_shm_get_va(dev->fw_shm_pool, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dev->shbuf)) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to get TEE virtual address\n");
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(dev->shbuf);
> +		goto out_shm;
> +	}
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "TEE init done\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_shm:
> +	tee_shm_free(dev->fw_shm_pool);
> +out_sess:
> +	tee_client_close_session(dev->tee_ctx, dev->session_id);
> +out_ctx:
> +	tee_client_close_context(dev->tee_ctx);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void amd_pmf_tee_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	/* Free the shared memory pool */
> +	tee_shm_free(dev->fw_shm_pool);
> +
> +	/* close the existing session with PMF TA*/

Missing space.

> +	tee_client_close_session(dev->tee_ctx, dev->session_id);
> +
> +	/* close the context with TEE driver */
> +	tee_client_close_context(dev->tee_ctx);
> +}
> +
> +int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	return amd_pmf_tee_init(dev);
> +}
> +
> +void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev);
> +}
> 

-- 
 i.

Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF TEE interface

[Shyam Sundar S K]

On 10/4/2023 4:20 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> 
>> AMD PMF driver loads the PMF TA (Trusted Application) into the AMD
>> ASP's (AMD Security Processor) TEE (Trusted Execution Environment).
>>
>> PMF Trusted Application is a secured firmware placed under
>> /lib/firmware/amdtee gets loaded only when the TEE environment is
>> initialized. Add the initial code path to build these pipes.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   3 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  11 ++-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  16 ++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> index fdededf54392..d2746ee7369f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> @@ -6,4 +6,5 @@
>>  
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
>> -		auto-mode.o cnqf.o
>> +		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
>> +		tee-if.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> index 78ed3ee22555..68f1389dda3e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> @@ -309,8 +309,11 @@ static void amd_pmf_init_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "SPS enabled and Platform Profiles registered\n");
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	/* Enable Auto Mode */
>> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>> +	if (amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev)) {
>> +		/* Enable Smart PC Solution builder */
>> +		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
>> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>> +		/* Enable Auto Mode */
> 
> I'm pretty certain neither of these two comments add any information to 
> what's readily visible from the code itself so they can be dropped.
> 
>>  		amd_pmf_init_auto_mode(dev);
>>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Auto Mode Init done\n");
>>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
>> @@ -330,7 +333,9 @@ static void amd_pmf_deinit_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  		amd_pmf_deinit_sps(dev);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>> +	if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
>> +		amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(dev);
>> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>>  		amd_pmf_deinit_auto_mode(dev);
>>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
>>  			  is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_DC)) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index deba88e6e4c8..02460c2a31ea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>>  	bool cnqf_enabled;
>>  	bool cnqf_supported;
>>  	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
>> +	/* Smart PC solution builder */
>> +	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
>> +	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
>> +	u32 session_id;
>> +	void *shbuf;
>> +	bool smart_pc_enabled;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct apmf_sps_prop_granular {
>> @@ -389,6 +395,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>> +struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
>> +	int command_id;
>> +	int resp_id;
>> +	u32 pmf_result;
>> +	u32 if_version;
>> +};
>> +
>>  /* Core Layer */
>>  int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>>  void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>> @@ -433,4 +446,7 @@ void amd_pmf_deinit_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>>  int amd_pmf_trans_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int socket_power, ktime_t time_lapsed_ms);
>>  extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>>  
>> +/* Smart PC builder Layer*/
> 
> Missing space.
> 
>> +int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>> +void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>>  #endif /* PMF_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..4db80ca59a11
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - TEE Interface
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + * All Rights Reserved.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
>> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
>> +#include "pmf.h"
>> +
>> +#define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
>> +static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
>> +						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
>> +
>> +static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
>> +{
>> +	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_pmf_ta_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *id)
>> +{
>> +	struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg = {};
>> +	int rc;
>> +
>> +	export_uuid(sess_arg.uuid, &amd_pmf_ta_uuid);
>> +	sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_PUBLIC;
>> +	sess_arg.num_params = 0;
>> +
>> +	rc = tee_client_open_session(ctx, &sess_arg, NULL);
>> +	if (rc < 0 || sess_arg.ret != 0) {
>> +		pr_err("Failed to open TEE session err:%#x, ret:%#x\n", sess_arg.ret, rc);
> 
> Print normal -Exx error codes as %d, not %x (rc). I don't know what would 
> be best to do with sess_arg.ret, TEEC_ERROR_* look like errnos (negative 
> values) manually converted into u32.

in drivers/tee/amdtee/amdtee_private.h, all the TEEC_* are hex. So
sess_arg.ret can remain %x? rc I have changed to %d.

Rest all I will address in v3.

Thanks,
Shyam
> 
>> +		rc = -EINVAL;
> 
> If rc < 0, I think you should just pass the error code on.
> 
>> +	} else {
>> +		*id = sess_arg.session;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_pmf_tee_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	u32 size;
>> +
>> +	/* Open context with TEE driver */
> 
> Too obvious comment to stay, it's what the code already says on the next 
> line so there's little point to repeat something this obvious in the 
> comments.
> 
>> +	dev->tee_ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match, NULL, NULL);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(dev->tee_ctx)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to open TEE context\n");
>> +		return PTR_ERR(dev->tee_ctx);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Open session with PMF Trusted App */
> 
> Remove this one too.
> 
>> +	ret = amd_pmf_ta_open_session(dev->tee_ctx, &dev->session_id);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to open TA session (%d)\n", ret);
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out_ctx;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	size = sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory);
>> +	dev->fw_shm_pool = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(dev->tee_ctx, size);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(dev->fw_shm_pool)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to alloc TEE shared memory\n");
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(dev->fw_shm_pool);
>> +		goto out_sess;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	dev->shbuf = tee_shm_get_va(dev->fw_shm_pool, 0);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(dev->shbuf)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to get TEE virtual address\n");
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(dev->shbuf);
>> +		goto out_shm;
>> +	}
>> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "TEE init done\n");
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +out_shm:
>> +	tee_shm_free(dev->fw_shm_pool);
>> +out_sess:
>> +	tee_client_close_session(dev->tee_ctx, dev->session_id);
>> +out_ctx:
>> +	tee_client_close_context(dev->tee_ctx);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void amd_pmf_tee_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	/* Free the shared memory pool */
>> +	tee_shm_free(dev->fw_shm_pool);
>> +
>> +	/* close the existing session with PMF TA*/
> 
> Missing space.
> 
>> +	tee_client_close_session(dev->tee_ctx, dev->session_id);
>> +
>> +	/* close the context with TEE driver */
>> +	tee_client_close_context(dev->tee_ctx);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	return amd_pmf_tee_init(dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev);
>> +}
>>
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF TEE interface

[Ilpo Järvinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6339 bytes --]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> 
> 
> On 10/4/2023 4:20 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> > 
> >> AMD PMF driver loads the PMF TA (Trusted Application) into the AMD
> >> ASP's (AMD Security Processor) TEE (Trusted Execution Environment).
> >>
> >> PMF Trusted Application is a secured firmware placed under
> >> /lib/firmware/amdtee gets loaded only when the TEE environment is
> >> initialized. Add the initial code path to build these pipes.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   3 +-
> >>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  11 ++-
> >>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  16 ++++
> >>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> >> index fdededf54392..d2746ee7369f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> >> @@ -6,4 +6,5 @@
> >>  
> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
> >>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
> >> -		auto-mode.o cnqf.o
> >> +		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
> >> +		tee-if.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> index 78ed3ee22555..68f1389dda3e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> @@ -309,8 +309,11 @@ static void amd_pmf_init_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> >>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "SPS enabled and Platform Profiles registered\n");
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	/* Enable Auto Mode */
> >> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> >> +	if (amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev)) {
> >> +		/* Enable Smart PC Solution builder */
> >> +		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
> >> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> >> +		/* Enable Auto Mode */
> > 
> > I'm pretty certain neither of these two comments add any information to 
> > what's readily visible from the code itself so they can be dropped.
> > 
> >>  		amd_pmf_init_auto_mode(dev);
> >>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Auto Mode Init done\n");
> >>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
> >> @@ -330,7 +333,9 @@ static void amd_pmf_deinit_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> >>  		amd_pmf_deinit_sps(dev);
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> >> +	if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
> >> +		amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(dev);
> >> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> >>  		amd_pmf_deinit_auto_mode(dev);
> >>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
> >>  			  is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_DC)) {
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> >> index deba88e6e4c8..02460c2a31ea 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> >> @@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
> >>  	bool cnqf_enabled;
> >>  	bool cnqf_supported;
> >>  	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
> >> +	/* Smart PC solution builder */
> >> +	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
> >> +	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
> >> +	u32 session_id;
> >> +	void *shbuf;
> >> +	bool smart_pc_enabled;
> >>  };
> >>  
> >>  struct apmf_sps_prop_granular {
> >> @@ -389,6 +395,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
> >>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
> >>  } __packed;
> >>  
> >> +struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
> >> +	int command_id;
> >> +	int resp_id;
> >> +	u32 pmf_result;
> >> +	u32 if_version;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  /* Core Layer */
> >>  int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
> >>  void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
> >> @@ -433,4 +446,7 @@ void amd_pmf_deinit_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
> >>  int amd_pmf_trans_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int socket_power, ktime_t time_lapsed_ms);
> >>  extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
> >>  
> >> +/* Smart PC builder Layer*/
> > 
> > Missing space.
> > 
> >> +int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
> >> +void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
> >>  #endif /* PMF_H */
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..4db80ca59a11
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +/*
> >> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - TEE Interface
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> >> + * All Rights Reserved.
> >> + *
> >> + * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
> >> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> >> +#include "pmf.h"
> >> +
> >> +#define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
> >> +static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
> >> +						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
> >> +
> >> +static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
> >> +{
> >> +	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int amd_pmf_ta_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *id)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg = {};
> >> +	int rc;
> >> +
> >> +	export_uuid(sess_arg.uuid, &amd_pmf_ta_uuid);
> >> +	sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_PUBLIC;
> >> +	sess_arg.num_params = 0;
> >> +
> >> +	rc = tee_client_open_session(ctx, &sess_arg, NULL);
> >> +	if (rc < 0 || sess_arg.ret != 0) {
> >> +		pr_err("Failed to open TEE session err:%#x, ret:%#x\n", sess_arg.ret, rc);
> > 
> > Print normal -Exx error codes as %d, not %x (rc). I don't know what would 
> > be best to do with sess_arg.ret, TEEC_ERROR_* look like errnos (negative 
> > values) manually converted into u32.
> 
> in drivers/tee/amdtee/amdtee_private.h, all the TEEC_* are hex. So
> sess_arg.ret can remain %x?

Sure, you can leave it to %x.

-- 
 i.

Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF TEE interface

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> AMD PMF driver loads the PMF TA (Trusted Application) into the AMD
> ASP's (AMD Security Processor) TEE (Trusted Execution Environment).
> 
> PMF Trusted Application is a secured firmware placed under
> /lib/firmware/amdtee gets loaded only when the TEE environment is
> initialized. Add the initial code path to build these pipes.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   3 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  11 ++-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  16 ++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> index fdededf54392..d2746ee7369f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> @@ -6,4 +6,5 @@
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
> -		auto-mode.o cnqf.o
> +		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
> +		tee-if.o
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> index 78ed3ee22555..68f1389dda3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> @@ -309,8 +309,11 @@ static void amd_pmf_init_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "SPS enabled and Platform Profiles registered\n");
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Enable Auto Mode */
> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> +	if (amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(dev)) {
> +		/* Enable Smart PC Solution builder */
> +		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Smart PC Solution Enabled\n");
> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> +		/* Enable Auto Mode */
>  		amd_pmf_init_auto_mode(dev);
>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Auto Mode Init done\n");
>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
> @@ -330,7 +333,9 @@ static void amd_pmf_deinit_features(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  		amd_pmf_deinit_sps(dev);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
> +	if (dev->smart_pc_enabled) {
> +		amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(dev);
> +	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_AUTO_MODE)) {
>  		amd_pmf_deinit_auto_mode(dev);
>  	} else if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_AC) ||
>  			  is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_DYN_SLIDER_DC)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index deba88e6e4c8..02460c2a31ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>  	bool cnqf_enabled;
>  	bool cnqf_supported;
>  	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
> +	/* Smart PC solution builder */
> +	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
> +	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
> +	u32 session_id;
> +	void *shbuf;
> +	bool smart_pc_enabled;
>  };
>  
>  struct apmf_sps_prop_granular {
> @@ -389,6 +395,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
> +	int command_id;
> +	int resp_id;
> +	u32 pmf_result;
> +	u32 if_version;
> +};
> +
>  /* Core Layer */
>  int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>  void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
> @@ -433,4 +446,7 @@ void amd_pmf_deinit_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  int amd_pmf_trans_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int socket_power, ktime_t time_lapsed_ms);
>  extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>  
> +/* Smart PC builder Layer*/
> +int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
> +void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  #endif /* PMF_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4db80ca59a11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - TEE Interface
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + * All Rights Reserved.
> + *
> + * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/tee_drv.h>
> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> +#include "pmf.h"
> +
> +#define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
> +static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
> +						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
> +{
> +	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_ta_open_session(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 *id)
> +{
> +	struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg = {};
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	export_uuid(sess_arg.uuid, &amd_pmf_ta_uuid);
> +	sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_PUBLIC;
> +	sess_arg.num_params = 0;
> +
> +	rc = tee_client_open_session(ctx, &sess_arg, NULL);

This will probably fail build if CONFIG_TEE is not set as nothing 
is added here to require it?

-- 
 i.

[PATCH v2 02/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support PMF-TA interaction

[Shyam Sundar S K]

PMF TA (Trusted Application) loads via the TEE environment into the
AMD ASP.

PMF-TA supports two commands:
1) Init: Initialize the TA with the PMF Smart PC policy binary and
start the policy engine. A policy is a combination of inputs and
outputs, where;
 - the inputs are the changing dynamics of the system like the user
   behaviour, system heuristics etc.
 - the outputs, which are the actions to be set on the system which
   lead to better power management and enhanced user experience.

PMF driver acts as a central manager in this case to supply the
inputs required to the TA (either by getting the information from
the other kernel subsystems or from userland)

2) Enact: Enact the output actions from the TA. The action could be
applying a new thermal limit to boost/throttle the power limits or
change system behavior.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 10 +++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 02460c2a31ea..e0837799f521 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
 #define ARG_NONE 0
 #define AVG_SAMPLE_SIZE 3
 
+/* TA macros */
+#define PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR				1
+
 /* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
 struct apmf_verify_interface {
 	u16 size;
@@ -184,6 +187,7 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
 	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
 	u32 session_id;
 	void *shbuf;
+	struct delayed_work pb_work;
 	bool smart_pc_enabled;
 };
 
@@ -395,6 +399,12 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
 	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
 } __packed;
 
+/* cmd ids for TA communication */
+enum ta_pmf_command {
+	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE,
+	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES,
+};
+
 struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
 	int command_id;
 	int resp_id;
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 4db80ca59a11..1b3985cd7c08 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -13,9 +13,96 @@
 #include "pmf.h"
 
 #define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
+
+/* Policy binary actions sampling frequency (in ms) */
+static int pb_actions_ms = 1000;
+#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
+module_param(pb_actions_ms, int, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_actions_ms, "Policy binary actions sampling frequency (default = 1000ms)");
+#endif
+
 static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
 						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
 
+static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
+				 struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *arg,
+				 struct tee_param *param)
+{
+	memset(arg, 0, sizeof(*arg));
+	memset(param, 0, MAX_TEE_PARAM * sizeof(*param));
+
+	arg->func = cmd;
+	arg->session = dev->session_id;
+	arg->num_params = MAX_TEE_PARAM;
+
+	/* Fill invoke cmd params */
+	param[0].u.memref.size = sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory);
+	param[0].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT;
+	param[0].u.memref.shm = dev->fw_shm_pool;
+	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
+	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
+	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!dev->tee_ctx)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
+	memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));
+	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES;
+	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
+
+	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES, &arg, param);
+
+	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
+	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "TEE enact cmd failed. err: %x, ret:%x\n", arg.ret, ret);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
+	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
+	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (!dev->tee_ctx) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to get TEE context\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
+	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE;
+	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
+
+	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE, &arg, param);
+
+	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
+	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to invoke TEE init cmd. err: %x, ret:%x\n", arg.ret, ret);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return ta_sm->pmf_result;
+}
+
+static void amd_pmf_invoke_cmd(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct amd_pmf_dev, pb_work.work);
+
+	amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(dev);
+	schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms));
+}
+
 static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
 {
 	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
@@ -103,10 +190,18 @@ static void amd_pmf_tee_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 
 int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
-	return amd_pmf_tee_init(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = amd_pmf_tee_init(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work);
 	amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev);
 }
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support PMF-TA interaction

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> PMF TA (Trusted Application) loads via the TEE environment into the
> AMD ASP.
> 
> PMF-TA supports two commands:
> 1) Init: Initialize the TA with the PMF Smart PC policy binary and
> start the policy engine. A policy is a combination of inputs and
> outputs, where;
>  - the inputs are the changing dynamics of the system like the user
>    behaviour, system heuristics etc.
>  - the outputs, which are the actions to be set on the system which
>    lead to better power management and enhanced user experience.
> 
> PMF driver acts as a central manager in this case to supply the
> inputs required to the TA (either by getting the information from
> the other kernel subsystems or from userland)
> 
> 2) Enact: Enact the output actions from the TA. The action could be
> applying a new thermal limit to boost/throttle the power limits or
> change system behavior.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 10 +++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 02460c2a31ea..e0837799f521 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
>  #define ARG_NONE 0
>  #define AVG_SAMPLE_SIZE 3
>  
> +/* TA macros */
> +#define PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR				1
> +
>  /* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
>  struct apmf_verify_interface {
>  	u16 size;
> @@ -184,6 +187,7 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>  	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
>  	u32 session_id;
>  	void *shbuf;
> +	struct delayed_work pb_work;
>  	bool smart_pc_enabled;
>  };
>  
> @@ -395,6 +399,12 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +/* cmd ids for TA communication */
> +enum ta_pmf_command {
> +	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE,
> +	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES,
> +};
> +
>  struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
>  	int command_id;
>  	int resp_id;
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> index 4db80ca59a11..1b3985cd7c08 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,96 @@
>  #include "pmf.h"
>  
>  #define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
> +
> +/* Policy binary actions sampling frequency (in ms) */
> +static int pb_actions_ms = 1000;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
> +module_param(pb_actions_ms, int, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_actions_ms, "Policy binary actions sampling frequency (default = 1000ms)");
> +#endif
> +
>  static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
>  						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
>  
> +static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
> +				 struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *arg,
> +				 struct tee_param *param)
> +{
> +	memset(arg, 0, sizeof(*arg));
> +	memset(param, 0, MAX_TEE_PARAM * sizeof(*param));
> +
> +	arg->func = cmd;
> +	arg->session = dev->session_id;
> +	arg->num_params = MAX_TEE_PARAM;
> +
> +	/* Fill invoke cmd params */
> +	param[0].u.memref.size = sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory);
> +	param[0].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT;
> +	param[0].u.memref.shm = dev->fw_shm_pool;
> +	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
> +	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!dev->tee_ctx)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;

Don't cast from void * to a typed pointer, it's unnecessary as compiler 
will handle that for you.

> +	memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));

sizeof(*ta_sm) to be on the safer side of things.

> +	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES;
> +	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
> +
> +	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES, &arg, param);
> +
> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "TEE enact cmd failed. err: %x, ret:%x\n", arg.ret, ret);

-Exx code should be printed as %x

> +		return -EINVAL;

This overrides the original error code if ret < 0.

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
> +	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
> +	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!dev->tee_ctx) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to get TEE context\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;

Unnecessary cast from void *.

> +	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE;
> +	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
> +
> +	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE, &arg, param);
> +
> +	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
> +	if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to invoke TEE init cmd. err: %x, ret:%x\n", arg.ret, ret);
> +		return -EINVAL;

As per earlier comments (x2).

> +	}
> +
> +	return ta_sm->pmf_result;
> +}
> +
> +static void amd_pmf_invoke_cmd(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct amd_pmf_dev, pb_work.work);
> +
> +	amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(dev);
> +	schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms));
> +}
> +
>  static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
>  {
>  	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
> @@ -103,10 +190,18 @@ static void amd_pmf_tee_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  
>  int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  {
> -	return amd_pmf_tee_init(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = amd_pmf_tee_init(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  {
> +	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work);
>  	amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev);
>  }
> 

-- 
 i.

Re: [PATCH v2 02/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support PMF-TA interaction

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> PMF TA (Trusted Application) loads via the TEE environment into the
> AMD ASP.
> 
> PMF-TA supports two commands:
> 1) Init: Initialize the TA with the PMF Smart PC policy binary and
> start the policy engine. A policy is a combination of inputs and
> outputs, where;
>  - the inputs are the changing dynamics of the system like the user
>    behaviour, system heuristics etc.
>  - the outputs, which are the actions to be set on the system which
>    lead to better power management and enhanced user experience.
> 
> PMF driver acts as a central manager in this case to supply the
> inputs required to the TA (either by getting the information from
> the other kernel subsystems or from userland)
> 
> 2) Enact: Enact the output actions from the TA. The action could be
> applying a new thermal limit to boost/throttle the power limits or
> change system behavior.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 10 +++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 02460c2a31ea..e0837799f521 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
>  #define ARG_NONE 0
>  #define AVG_SAMPLE_SIZE 3
>  
> +/* TA macros */
> +#define PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR				1
> +
>  /* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
>  struct apmf_verify_interface {
>  	u16 size;
> @@ -184,6 +187,7 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>  	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
>  	u32 session_id;
>  	void *shbuf;
> +	struct delayed_work pb_work;
>  	bool smart_pc_enabled;
>  };
>  
> @@ -395,6 +399,12 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +/* cmd ids for TA communication */
> +enum ta_pmf_command {
> +	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE,
> +	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES,
> +};
> +
>  struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
>  	int command_id;
>  	int resp_id;
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> index 4db80ca59a11..1b3985cd7c08 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,96 @@
>  #include "pmf.h"
>  
>  #define MAX_TEE_PARAM	4
> +
> +/* Policy binary actions sampling frequency (in ms) */
> +static int pb_actions_ms = 1000;

MSEC_PER_SEC (from #include <linux/time.h>, don't include the vdso one).

> +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
> +module_param(pb_actions_ms, int, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_actions_ms, "Policy binary actions sampling frequency (default = 1000ms)");
> +#endif

-- 
 i.

[PATCH v2 03/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Change return type of amd_pmf_set_dram_addr()

[Shyam Sundar S K]

In the current code, the metrics table information was required only
for auto-mode or CnQF at a given time. Hence keeping the return type
of amd_pmf_set_dram_addr() as static made sense.

But with the addition of Smart PC builder feature, the metrics table
information has to be shared by the Smart PC also and this feature
resides outside of core.c.

To make amd_pmf_set_dram_addr() visible outside of core.c make it
as a non-static function and move the allocation of memory for
metrics table from amd_pmf_init_metrics_table() to amd_pmf_set_dram_addr()
as amd_pmf_set_dram_addr() is the common function to set the DRAM
address.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h  |  1 +
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
index 68f1389dda3e..678dce4fea08 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
@@ -251,29 +251,35 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pmf_pci_ids[] = {
 	{ }
 };
 
-static void amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+int amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
 	u64 phys_addr;
 	u32 hi, low;
 
+	/* Get Metrics Table Address */
+	dev->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(dev->m_table), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dev->buf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	phys_addr = virt_to_phys(dev->buf);
 	hi = phys_addr >> 32;
 	low = phys_addr & GENMASK(31, 0);
 
 	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH, 0, hi, NULL);
 	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_LOW, 0, low, NULL);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
-	/* Get Metrics Table Address */
-	dev->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(dev->m_table), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!dev->buf)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	int ret;
 
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->work_buffer, amd_pmf_get_metrics);
 
-	amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
+	ret = amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	/*
 	 * Start collecting the metrics data after a small delay
@@ -287,9 +293,13 @@ int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 static int amd_pmf_resume_handler(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
 
-	if (pdev->buf)
-		amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(pdev);
+	if (pdev->buf) {
+		ret = amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(pdev);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index e0837799f521..3930b8ed8333 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 int amd_pmf_get_power_source(void);
 int apmf_install_handler(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
 int apmf_os_power_slider_update(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u8 flag);
+int amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 
 /* SPS Layer */
 int amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Change return type of amd_pmf_set_dram_addr()

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> In the current code, the metrics table information was required only
> for auto-mode or CnQF at a given time. Hence keeping the return type
> of amd_pmf_set_dram_addr() as static made sense.
> 
> But with the addition of Smart PC builder feature, the metrics table
> information has to be shared by the Smart PC also and this feature
> resides outside of core.c.
> 
> To make amd_pmf_set_dram_addr() visible outside of core.c make it
> as a non-static function and move the allocation of memory for
> metrics table from amd_pmf_init_metrics_table() to amd_pmf_set_dram_addr()
> as amd_pmf_set_dram_addr() is the common function to set the DRAM
> address.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h  |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> index 68f1389dda3e..678dce4fea08 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> @@ -251,29 +251,35 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pmf_pci_ids[] = {
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
> -static void amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +int amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	u64 phys_addr;
>  	u32 hi, low;
>  
> +	/* Get Metrics Table Address */
> +	dev->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(dev->m_table), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dev->buf)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	phys_addr = virt_to_phys(dev->buf);
>  	hi = phys_addr >> 32;
>  	low = phys_addr & GENMASK(31, 0);
>  
>  	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH, 0, hi, NULL);
>  	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_LOW, 0, low, NULL);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  {
> -	/* Get Metrics Table Address */
> -	dev->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(dev->m_table), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!dev->buf)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->work_buffer, amd_pmf_get_metrics);
>  
> -	amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
> +	ret = amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Start collecting the metrics data after a small delay
> @@ -287,9 +293,13 @@ int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  static int amd_pmf_resume_handler(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	if (pdev->buf)
> -		amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(pdev);
> +	if (pdev->buf) {
> +		ret = amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(pdev);

Won't this now leak the previous ->buf?

> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index e0837799f521..3930b8ed8333 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ int amd_pmf_init_metrics_table(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  int amd_pmf_get_power_source(void);
>  int apmf_install_handler(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>  int apmf_os_power_slider_update(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u8 flag);
> +int amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  
>  /* SPS Layer */
>  int amd_pmf_get_pprof_modes(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
> 

-- 
 i.

[PATCH v2 04/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary

[Shyam Sundar S K]

PMF Policy binary is a encrypted and signed binary that will be part
of the BIOS. PMF driver via the ACPI interface checks the existence
of Smart PC bit. If the advertised bit is found, PMF driver walks
the acpi namespace to find out the policy binary size and the address
which has to be passed to the TA during the TA init sequence.

The policy binary is comprised of inputs (or the events) and outputs
(or the actions). With the PMF ecosystem, OEMs generate the policy
binary (or could be multiple binaries) that contains a supported set
of inputs and outputs which could be specifically carved out for each
usage segment (or for each user also) that could influence the system
behavior either by enriching the user experience or/and boost/throttle
power limits.

Once the TA init command succeeds, the PMF driver sends the changing
events in the current environment to the TA for a constant sampling
frequency time (the event here could be a lid close or open) and
if the policy binary has corresponding action built within it, the
TA sends the action for it in the subsequent enact command.

If the inputs sent to the TA has no output defined in the policy
binary generated by OEMs, there will be no action to be performed
by the PMF driver.

Example policies:

1) if slider is performance ; set the SPL to 40W
Here PMF driver registers with the platform profile interface and
when the slider position is changed, PMF driver lets the TA know
about this. TA sends back an action to update the Sustained
Power Limit (SPL). PMF driver updates this limit via the PMFW mailbox.

2) if user_away ; then lock the system
Here PMF driver hooks to the AMD SFH driver to know the user presence
and send the inputs to TA and if the condition is met, the TA sends
the action of locking the system. PMF driver generates a uevent and
based on the udev rule in the userland the system gets locked with
systemctl.

The intent here is to provide the OEM's to make a policy to lock the
system when the user is away ; but the userland can make a choice to
ignore it.

and so on.

The OEMs will have an utility to create numerous such policies and
the policies shall be reviewed by AMD before signing and encrypting
them. Policies are shared between operating systems to have seemless user
experience.

Since all this action has to happen via the "amdtee" driver, currently
there is no caller for it in the kernel which can load the amdtee driver.
Without amdtee driver loading onto the system the "tee" calls shall fail
from the PMF driver. Hence an explicit "request_module" has been added
to address this.

Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig  |   1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c   |  37 +++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  12 +++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
index 3064bc8ea167..437b78c6d1c5 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config AMD_PMF
 	depends on POWER_SUPPLY
 	depends on AMD_NB
 	select ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE
+	depends on AMDTEE
 	help
 	  This driver provides support for the AMD Platform Management Framework.
 	  The goal is to enhance end user experience by making AMD PCs smarter,
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
index 3fc5e4547d9f..d0512af2cd42 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
@@ -286,6 +286,43 @@ int apmf_install_handler(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static acpi_status apmf_walk_resources(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
+{
+	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = data;
+
+	switch (res->type) {
+	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS64:
+		dev->policy_addr = res->data.address64.address.minimum;
+		dev->policy_sz = res->data.address64.address.address_length;
+		break;
+	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32:
+		dev->policy_addr = res->data.fixed_memory32.address;
+		dev->policy_sz = res->data.fixed_memory32.address_length;
+		break;
+	}
+
+	if (!dev->policy_addr || dev->policy_sz > POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ || dev->policy_sz == 0) {
+		pr_err("Incorrect Policy params, possibly a SBIOS bug\n");
+		return AE_ERROR;
+	}
+
+	return AE_OK;
+}
+
+int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
+{
+	acpi_handle ahandle = ACPI_HANDLE(pmf_dev->dev);
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	status = acpi_walk_resources(ahandle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, apmf_walk_resources, pmf_dev);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		dev_err(pmf_dev->dev, "acpi_walk_resources failed\n");
+		return status;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
 {
 	acpi_handle ahandle = ACPI_HANDLE(pmf_dev->dev);
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
index 678dce4fea08..787f25511191 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
@@ -384,6 +384,18 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	err = apmf_check_smart_pc(dev);
+	if (!err) {
+		/* in order for Smart PC solution to work it has a hard dependency
+		 * on the amdtee driver to be loaded first even before the PMF driver
+		 * loads. PMF ASL has a _CRS method that advertises the existence
+		 * of Smart PC bit. If this information is present, use this to
+		 * explicitly probe the amdtee driver, so that "tee" plumbing is done
+		 * before the PMF Smart PC init happens.
+		 */
+		if (request_module("amdtee"))
+			pr_err("Failed to load amdtee. PMF Smart PC not enabled!\n");
+	}
 
 	rdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
 	if (!rdev || !pci_match_id(pmf_pci_ids, rdev)) {
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 3930b8ed8333..6f4b6f4ecee4 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/platform_profile.h>
 
+#define POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ		0x4b000
+#define POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE		0x31535024
+#define POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET		0x10
+#define POLICY_COOKIE_LEN		0x14
+
 /* APMF Functions */
 #define APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE			0
 #define APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS			1
@@ -59,8 +64,20 @@
 #define ARG_NONE 0
 #define AVG_SAMPLE_SIZE 3
 
+/* Policy Actions */
+#define PMF_POLICY_SPL						2
+#define PMF_POLICY_SPPT						3
+#define PMF_POLICY_FPPT						4
+#define PMF_POLICY_SPPT_APU_ONLY				5
+#define PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN					6
+#define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
+#define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
+
 /* TA macros */
 #define PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR				1
+#define TA_PMF_ACTION_MAX					32
+#define TA_PMF_UNDO_MAX						8
+#define MAX_OPERATION_PARAMS					4
 
 /* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
 struct apmf_verify_interface {
@@ -183,11 +200,16 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
 	bool cnqf_supported;
 	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
 	/* Smart PC solution builder */
+	unsigned char *policy_buf;
+	u32 policy_sz;
 	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
 	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
 	u32 session_id;
 	void *shbuf;
 	struct delayed_work pb_work;
+	struct pmf_action_table *prev_data;
+	u64 policy_addr;
+	void *policy_base;
 	bool smart_pc_enabled;
 };
 
@@ -399,17 +421,129 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
 	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
 } __packed;
 
+/* Smart PC - TA internals */
+enum ta_slider {
+	TA_BEST_BATTERY, /* Best Battery */
+	TA_BETTER_BATTERY, /* Better Battery */
+	TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE, /* Better Performance */
+	TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE, /* Best Performance */
+	TA_MAX,
+};
+
 /* cmd ids for TA communication */
 enum ta_pmf_command {
 	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE,
 	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES,
 };
 
+enum ta_pmf_error_type {
+	TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_GENERIC,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO_VALIDATE,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO_VERIFY_OEM,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_POLICY_BUILDER,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_CONVERT,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_SETUP,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_ENACT,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_ASD_GET_DEVICE_INFO,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_ASD_GET_DEVICE_PCIE_INFO,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_SYS_DRV_FW_VALIDATION,
+	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_MAX,
+};
+
+struct pmf_action_table {
+	unsigned long spl; /* in mW */
+	unsigned long sppt; /* in mW */
+	unsigned long sppt_apuonly; /* in mW */
+	unsigned long fppt; /* in mW */
+	unsigned long stt_minlimit; /* in mW */
+	unsigned long stt_skintemp_apu; /* in C */
+	unsigned long stt_skintemp_hs2; /* in C */
+};
+
+/* Input conditions */
+struct ta_pmf_condition_info {
+	u32 power_source;
+	u32 bat_percentage;
+	u32 power_slider;
+	u32 lid_state;
+	bool user_present;
+	u32 rsvd1[2];
+	u32 monitor_count;
+	u32 rsvd2[2];
+	u32 bat_design;
+	u32 full_charge_capacity;
+	int drain_rate;
+	bool user_engaged;
+	u32 device_state;
+	u32 socket_power;
+	u32 skin_temperature;
+	u32 rsvd3[5];
+	u32 ambient_light;
+	u32 length;
+	u32 avg_c0residency;
+	u32 max_c0residency;
+	u32 s0i3_entry;
+	u32 gfx_busy;
+	u32 rsvd4[7];
+	bool camera_state;
+	u32 workload_type;
+	u32 display_type;
+	u32 display_state;
+	u32 rsvd5[150];
+};
+
+struct ta_pmf_load_policy_table {
+	u32 table_size;
+	u8 table[POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ];
+};
+
+/* TA initialization params */
+struct ta_pmf_init_table {
+	u32 frequency; /* SMU sampling frequency */
+	bool validate;
+	bool sku_check;
+	bool metadata_macrocheck;
+	struct ta_pmf_load_policy_table policies_table;
+};
+
+/* Everything the TA needs to Enact Policies */
+struct ta_pmf_enact_table {
+	struct ta_pmf_condition_info ev_info;
+	u32 name;
+};
+
+struct ta_pmf_action {
+	u32 action_index;
+	u32 value;
+};
+
+/* output actions from TA */
+struct ta_pmf_enact_result {
+	u32 actions_count;
+	struct ta_pmf_action actions_list[TA_PMF_ACTION_MAX];
+	u32 undo_count;
+	struct ta_pmf_action undo_list[TA_PMF_UNDO_MAX];
+};
+
+union ta_pmf_input {
+	struct ta_pmf_enact_table enact_table;
+	struct ta_pmf_init_table init_table;
+};
+
+union ta_pmf_output {
+	struct ta_pmf_enact_result policy_apply_table;
+	u32 rsvd[906];
+};
+
 struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
 	int command_id;
 	int resp_id;
 	u32 pmf_result;
 	u32 if_version;
+	union ta_pmf_output pmf_output;
+	union ta_pmf_input pmf_input;
 };
 
 /* Core Layer */
@@ -460,4 +594,5 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
 /* Smart PC builder Layer*/
 int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
+int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
 #endif /* PMF_H */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 1b3985cd7c08..15aa6e6e1050 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -42,9 +42,77 @@ static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
 	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
 }
 
+static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
+{
+	unsigned long val;
+	int idx;
+
+	for (idx = 0; idx < out->actions_count; idx++) {
+		val = out->actions_list[idx].value;
+		switch (out->actions_list[idx].action_index) {
+		case PMF_POLICY_SPL:
+			if (dev->prev_data->spl != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPL, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPL : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->spl = val;
+			}
+			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_SPPT:
+			if (dev->prev_data->sppt != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPPT : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->sppt = val;
+			}
+			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_FPPT:
+			if (dev->prev_data->fppt != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_FPPT, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update FPPT : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->fppt = val;
+			}
+			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_SPPT_APU_ONLY:
+			if (dev->prev_data->sppt_apuonly != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT_APU_ONLY, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPPT_APU_ONLY : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->sppt_apuonly = val;
+			}
+			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN:
+			if (dev->prev_data->stt_minlimit != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_MIN_LIMIT, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_MIN : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->stt_minlimit = val;
+			}
+			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU:
+			if (dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_apu != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_APU, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_SKINTEMP_APU : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_apu = val;
+			}
+			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2:
+			if (dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_hs2 != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_HS2, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_SKINTEMP_HS2 : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_hs2 = val;
+			}
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
+	struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out = NULL;
 	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
 	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -52,7 +120,10 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	if (!dev->tee_ctx)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
 	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
+	out = &ta_sm->pmf_output.policy_apply_table;
+
 	memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));
 	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES;
 	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
@@ -65,6 +136,12 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	if (ta_sm->pmf_result == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS && out->actions_count) {
+		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "action count:%u result:%x\n", out->actions_count,
+			ta_sm->pmf_result);
+		amd_pmf_apply_policies(dev, out);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -72,6 +149,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
 	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
+	struct ta_pmf_init_table *in = NULL;
 	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -80,10 +158,20 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Policy Binary size: %u bytes\n", dev->policy_sz);
+	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
 	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
+	in = &ta_sm->pmf_input.init_table;
+
 	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE;
 	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
+	in->metadata_macrocheck = false;
+	in->sku_check = false;
+	in->validate = true;
+	in->frequency = pb_actions_ms;
+	in->policies_table.table_size = dev->policy_sz;
 
+	memcpy(in->policies_table.table, dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_sz);
 	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE, &arg, param);
 
 	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
@@ -103,6 +191,47 @@ static void amd_pmf_invoke_cmd(struct work_struct *work)
 	schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms));
 }
 
+static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	u32 cookie, length;
+	int res;
+
+	cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
+	length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
+
+	if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* update the actual length */
+	dev->policy_sz = length + 512;
+	res = amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(dev);
+	if (res == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS) {
+		/* now its safe to announce that smart pc is enabled */
+		dev->smart_pc_enabled = 1;
+		schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms * 3));
+	} else {
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "ta invoke cmd init failed err: %x\n", res);
+		return res;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	dev->policy_buf = kzalloc(dev->policy_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dev->policy_buf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	dev->policy_base = devm_ioremap(dev->dev, dev->policy_addr, dev->policy_sz);
+	if (!dev->policy_base)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz);
+
+	return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
+}
+
 static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
 {
 	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
@@ -148,7 +277,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_tee_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		goto out_ctx;
 	}
 
-	size = sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory);
+	size = sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory) + dev->policy_sz;
 	dev->fw_shm_pool = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(dev->tee_ctx, size);
 	if (IS_ERR(dev->fw_shm_pool)) {
 		dev_err(dev->dev, "Failed to alloc TEE shared memory\n");
@@ -197,11 +326,19 @@ int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		return ret;
 
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd);
-	return 0;
+	amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
+	amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(dev);
+	dev->prev_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->prev_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dev->prev_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	return dev->smart_pc_enabled;
 }
 
 void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
+	kfree(dev->prev_data);
+	kfree(dev->policy_buf);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work);
 	amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev);
 }
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> PMF Policy binary is a encrypted and signed binary that will be part
> of the BIOS. PMF driver via the ACPI interface checks the existence
> of Smart PC bit. If the advertised bit is found, PMF driver walks
> the acpi namespace to find out the policy binary size and the address
> which has to be passed to the TA during the TA init sequence.
> 
> The policy binary is comprised of inputs (or the events) and outputs
> (or the actions). With the PMF ecosystem, OEMs generate the policy
> binary (or could be multiple binaries) that contains a supported set
> of inputs and outputs which could be specifically carved out for each
> usage segment (or for each user also) that could influence the system
> behavior either by enriching the user experience or/and boost/throttle
> power limits.
> 
> Once the TA init command succeeds, the PMF driver sends the changing
> events in the current environment to the TA for a constant sampling
> frequency time (the event here could be a lid close or open) and
> if the policy binary has corresponding action built within it, the
> TA sends the action for it in the subsequent enact command.
> 
> If the inputs sent to the TA has no output defined in the policy
> binary generated by OEMs, there will be no action to be performed
> by the PMF driver.
> 
> Example policies:
> 
> 1) if slider is performance ; set the SPL to 40W
> Here PMF driver registers with the platform profile interface and
> when the slider position is changed, PMF driver lets the TA know
> about this. TA sends back an action to update the Sustained
> Power Limit (SPL). PMF driver updates this limit via the PMFW mailbox.
> 
> 2) if user_away ; then lock the system
> Here PMF driver hooks to the AMD SFH driver to know the user presence
> and send the inputs to TA and if the condition is met, the TA sends
> the action of locking the system. PMF driver generates a uevent and
> based on the udev rule in the userland the system gets locked with
> systemctl.
> 
> The intent here is to provide the OEM's to make a policy to lock the
> system when the user is away ; but the userland can make a choice to
> ignore it.
> 
> and so on.
> 
> The OEMs will have an utility to create numerous such policies and
> the policies shall be reviewed by AMD before signing and encrypting
> them. Policies are shared between operating systems to have seemless user
> experience.
> 
> Since all this action has to happen via the "amdtee" driver, currently
> there is no caller for it in the kernel which can load the amdtee driver.
> Without amdtee driver loading onto the system the "tee" calls shall fail
> from the PMF driver. Hence an explicit "request_module" has been added
> to address this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig  |   1 +
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c   |  37 +++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  12 +++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
> index 3064bc8ea167..437b78c6d1c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config AMD_PMF
>  	depends on POWER_SUPPLY
>  	depends on AMD_NB
>  	select ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE
> +	depends on AMDTEE
>  	help
>  	  This driver provides support for the AMD Platform Management Framework.
>  	  The goal is to enhance end user experience by making AMD PCs smarter,
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> index 3fc5e4547d9f..d0512af2cd42 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,43 @@ int apmf_install_handler(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static acpi_status apmf_walk_resources(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = data;
> +
> +	switch (res->type) {
> +	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS64:
> +		dev->policy_addr = res->data.address64.address.minimum;
> +		dev->policy_sz = res->data.address64.address.address_length;
> +		break;
> +	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32:
> +		dev->policy_addr = res->data.fixed_memory32.address;
> +		dev->policy_sz = res->data.fixed_memory32.address_length;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!dev->policy_addr || dev->policy_sz > POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ || dev->policy_sz == 0) {
> +		pr_err("Incorrect Policy params, possibly a SBIOS bug\n");
> +		return AE_ERROR;
> +	}
> +
> +	return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
> +{
> +	acpi_handle ahandle = ACPI_HANDLE(pmf_dev->dev);
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	status = acpi_walk_resources(ahandle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, apmf_walk_resources, pmf_dev);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		dev_err(pmf_dev->dev, "acpi_walk_resources failed\n");
> +		return status;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
>  {
>  	acpi_handle ahandle = ACPI_HANDLE(pmf_dev->dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> index 678dce4fea08..787f25511191 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,18 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	err = apmf_check_smart_pc(dev);
> +	if (!err) {
> +		/* in order for Smart PC solution to work it has a hard dependency
> +		 * on the amdtee driver to be loaded first even before the PMF driver
> +		 * loads. PMF ASL has a _CRS method that advertises the existence
> +		 * of Smart PC bit. If this information is present, use this to
> +		 * explicitly probe the amdtee driver, so that "tee" plumbing is done
> +		 * before the PMF Smart PC init happens.
> +		 */

But please follow no-text on /* line formatting for multiline comments. 
Also start with a capital letter.


> +		if (request_module("amdtee"))

Are you aware that this won't give you very strong guarantees about 
anything if request_module()'s function comments is to be believed?

If that's all what you're after, MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: amdtee"); is 
probably enough (and I unfortunately don't know the answer how to do it if 
you want something stronger than that when you don't directly depend on 
the symbols of the other module).

> +			pr_err("Failed to load amdtee. PMF Smart PC not enabled!\n");
> +	}
>  
>  	rdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
>  	if (!rdev || !pci_match_id(pmf_pci_ids, rdev)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 3930b8ed8333..6f4b6f4ecee4 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_profile.h>
>  
> +#define POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ		0x4b000
> +#define POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE		0x31535024
> +#define POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET		0x10
> +#define POLICY_COOKIE_LEN		0x14
> +
>  /* APMF Functions */
>  #define APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE			0
>  #define APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS			1
> @@ -59,8 +64,20 @@
>  #define ARG_NONE 0
>  #define AVG_SAMPLE_SIZE 3
>  
> +/* Policy Actions */
> +#define PMF_POLICY_SPL						2
> +#define PMF_POLICY_SPPT						3
> +#define PMF_POLICY_FPPT						4
> +#define PMF_POLICY_SPPT_APU_ONLY				5
> +#define PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN					6
> +#define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
> +#define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
> +
>  /* TA macros */
>  #define PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR				1
> +#define TA_PMF_ACTION_MAX					32
> +#define TA_PMF_UNDO_MAX						8
> +#define MAX_OPERATION_PARAMS					4
>  
>  /* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
>  struct apmf_verify_interface {
> @@ -183,11 +200,16 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>  	bool cnqf_supported;
>  	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
>  	/* Smart PC solution builder */
> +	unsigned char *policy_buf;
> +	u32 policy_sz;
>  	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
>  	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
>  	u32 session_id;
>  	void *shbuf;
>  	struct delayed_work pb_work;
> +	struct pmf_action_table *prev_data;
> +	u64 policy_addr;
> +	void *policy_base;
>  	bool smart_pc_enabled;
>  };
>  
> @@ -399,17 +421,129 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>  } __packed;
>  
> +/* Smart PC - TA internals */
> +enum ta_slider {
> +	TA_BEST_BATTERY, /* Best Battery */
> +	TA_BETTER_BATTERY, /* Better Battery */
> +	TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE, /* Better Performance */
> +	TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE, /* Best Performance */

Align comments.

> +	TA_MAX,
> +};
> +
>  /* cmd ids for TA communication */
>  enum ta_pmf_command {
>  	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE,
>  	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES,
>  };
>  
> +enum ta_pmf_error_type {
> +	TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_GENERIC,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO_VALIDATE,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO_VERIFY_OEM,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_POLICY_BUILDER,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_CONVERT,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_SETUP,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_ENACT,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_ASD_GET_DEVICE_INFO,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_ASD_GET_DEVICE_PCIE_INFO,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_SYS_DRV_FW_VALIDATION,
> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +struct pmf_action_table {
> +	unsigned long spl; /* in mW */
> +	unsigned long sppt; /* in mW */
> +	unsigned long sppt_apuonly; /* in mW */
> +	unsigned long fppt; /* in mW */
> +	unsigned long stt_minlimit; /* in mW */
> +	unsigned long stt_skintemp_apu; /* in C */
> +	unsigned long stt_skintemp_hs2; /* in C */

Ditto.

> +};
> +
> +/* Input conditions */
> +struct ta_pmf_condition_info {
> +	u32 power_source;
> +	u32 bat_percentage;
> +	u32 power_slider;
> +	u32 lid_state;
> +	bool user_present;
> +	u32 rsvd1[2];
> +	u32 monitor_count;
> +	u32 rsvd2[2];
> +	u32 bat_design;
> +	u32 full_charge_capacity;
> +	int drain_rate;
> +	bool user_engaged;
> +	u32 device_state;
> +	u32 socket_power;
> +	u32 skin_temperature;
> +	u32 rsvd3[5];
> +	u32 ambient_light;
> +	u32 length;
> +	u32 avg_c0residency;
> +	u32 max_c0residency;
> +	u32 s0i3_entry;
> +	u32 gfx_busy;
> +	u32 rsvd4[7];
> +	bool camera_state;
> +	u32 workload_type;
> +	u32 display_type;
> +	u32 display_state;
> +	u32 rsvd5[150];
> +};
> +
> +struct ta_pmf_load_policy_table {
> +	u32 table_size;
> +	u8 table[POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ];
> +};
> +
> +/* TA initialization params */
> +struct ta_pmf_init_table {
> +	u32 frequency; /* SMU sampling frequency */
> +	bool validate;
> +	bool sku_check;
> +	bool metadata_macrocheck;
> +	struct ta_pmf_load_policy_table policies_table;
> +};
> +
> +/* Everything the TA needs to Enact Policies */
> +struct ta_pmf_enact_table {
> +	struct ta_pmf_condition_info ev_info;
> +	u32 name;
> +};
> +
> +struct ta_pmf_action {
> +	u32 action_index;
> +	u32 value;
> +};
> +
> +/* output actions from TA */
> +struct ta_pmf_enact_result {
> +	u32 actions_count;
> +	struct ta_pmf_action actions_list[TA_PMF_ACTION_MAX];
> +	u32 undo_count;
> +	struct ta_pmf_action undo_list[TA_PMF_UNDO_MAX];
> +};
> +
> +union ta_pmf_input {
> +	struct ta_pmf_enact_table enact_table;
> +	struct ta_pmf_init_table init_table;
> +};
> +
> +union ta_pmf_output {
> +	struct ta_pmf_enact_result policy_apply_table;
> +	u32 rsvd[906];

This is some size (SZ_1K?) - sizeof(ta_pmf_enact_result)? I don't know if 
compiler would like such a construct though in the array declaration. If 
the compiler isn't complaining it would be the most informative way to 
state the size but if it's not happy, a comment might be useful.

> +};
> +
>  struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
>  	int command_id;
>  	int resp_id;
>  	u32 pmf_result;
>  	u32 if_version;
> +	union ta_pmf_output pmf_output;
> +	union ta_pmf_input pmf_input;
>  };
>  
>  /* Core Layer */
> @@ -460,4 +594,5 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>  /* Smart PC builder Layer*/
>  int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
> +int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>  #endif /* PMF_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> index 1b3985cd7c08..15aa6e6e1050 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -42,9 +42,77 @@ static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
>  	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	for (idx = 0; idx < out->actions_count; idx++) {
> +		val = out->actions_list[idx].value;
> +		switch (out->actions_list[idx].action_index) {
> +		case PMF_POLICY_SPL:
> +			if (dev->prev_data->spl != val) {
> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPL, false, val, NULL);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPL : %lu\n", val);
> +				dev->prev_data->spl = val;

Well, I'd have expected you to go u32 (and %u) here as isn't 
out->actions_list[idx].value u32? And amd_pmf_send_cmd also takes u32.
So unsigned long looks quite inconsistent and wasteful.

> +			}
> +			break;
> +
> +		case PMF_POLICY_SPPT:
> +			if (dev->prev_data->sppt != val) {
> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT, false, val, NULL);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPPT : %lu\n", val);
> +				dev->prev_data->sppt = val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +
> +		case PMF_POLICY_FPPT:
> +			if (dev->prev_data->fppt != val) {
> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_FPPT, false, val, NULL);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update FPPT : %lu\n", val);
> +				dev->prev_data->fppt = val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +
> +		case PMF_POLICY_SPPT_APU_ONLY:
> +			if (dev->prev_data->sppt_apuonly != val) {
> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT_APU_ONLY, false, val, NULL);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPPT_APU_ONLY : %lu\n", val);
> +				dev->prev_data->sppt_apuonly = val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +
> +		case PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN:
> +			if (dev->prev_data->stt_minlimit != val) {
> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_MIN_LIMIT, false, val, NULL);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_MIN : %lu\n", val);
> +				dev->prev_data->stt_minlimit = val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +
> +		case PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU:
> +			if (dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_apu != val) {
> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_APU, false, val, NULL);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_SKINTEMP_APU : %lu\n", val);
> +				dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_apu = val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +
> +		case PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2:
> +			if (dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_hs2 != val) {
> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_HS2, false, val, NULL);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_SKINTEMP_HS2 : %lu\n", val);
> +				dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_hs2 = val;
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
> +	struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out = NULL;
>  	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
>  	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>  	int ret = 0;
> @@ -52,7 +120,10 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  	if (!dev->tee_ctx)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
>  	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
> +	out = &ta_sm->pmf_output.policy_apply_table;
> +
>  	memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));
>  	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES;
>  	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
> @@ -65,6 +136,12 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (ta_sm->pmf_result == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS && out->actions_count) {
> +		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "action count:%u result:%x\n", out->actions_count,
> +			ta_sm->pmf_result);
> +		amd_pmf_apply_policies(dev, out);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -72,6 +149,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  {
>  	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
>  	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
> +	struct ta_pmf_init_table *in = NULL;
>  	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> @@ -80,10 +158,20 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Policy Binary size: %u bytes\n", dev->policy_sz);
> +	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
>  	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
> +	in = &ta_sm->pmf_input.init_table;
> +
>  	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE;
>  	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
> +	in->metadata_macrocheck = false;
> +	in->sku_check = false;
> +	in->validate = true;
> +	in->frequency = pb_actions_ms;
> +	in->policies_table.table_size = dev->policy_sz;
>  
> +	memcpy(in->policies_table.table, dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_sz);
>  	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE, &arg, param);
>  
>  	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
> @@ -103,6 +191,47 @@ static void amd_pmf_invoke_cmd(struct work_struct *work)
>  	schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms));
>  }
>  
> +static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	u32 cookie, length;
> +	int res;
> +
> +	cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
> +	length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
> +
> +	if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* update the actual length */
> +	dev->policy_sz = length + 512;
> +	res = amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(dev);
> +	if (res == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS) {
> +		/* now its safe to announce that smart pc is enabled */
> +		dev->smart_pc_enabled = 1;
> +		schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms * 3));

Why * 3? Explain in comment if you feel it's necessary as it's not 
obvious.


-- 
 i.

Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary

[Shyam Sundar S K]

On 10/4/2023 5:30 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> 
>> PMF Policy binary is a encrypted and signed binary that will be part
>> of the BIOS. PMF driver via the ACPI interface checks the existence
>> of Smart PC bit. If the advertised bit is found, PMF driver walks
>> the acpi namespace to find out the policy binary size and the address
>> which has to be passed to the TA during the TA init sequence.
>>
>> The policy binary is comprised of inputs (or the events) and outputs
>> (or the actions). With the PMF ecosystem, OEMs generate the policy
>> binary (or could be multiple binaries) that contains a supported set
>> of inputs and outputs which could be specifically carved out for each
>> usage segment (or for each user also) that could influence the system
>> behavior either by enriching the user experience or/and boost/throttle
>> power limits.
>>
>> Once the TA init command succeeds, the PMF driver sends the changing
>> events in the current environment to the TA for a constant sampling
>> frequency time (the event here could be a lid close or open) and
>> if the policy binary has corresponding action built within it, the
>> TA sends the action for it in the subsequent enact command.
>>
>> If the inputs sent to the TA has no output defined in the policy
>> binary generated by OEMs, there will be no action to be performed
>> by the PMF driver.
>>
>> Example policies:
>>
>> 1) if slider is performance ; set the SPL to 40W
>> Here PMF driver registers with the platform profile interface and
>> when the slider position is changed, PMF driver lets the TA know
>> about this. TA sends back an action to update the Sustained
>> Power Limit (SPL). PMF driver updates this limit via the PMFW mailbox.
>>
>> 2) if user_away ; then lock the system
>> Here PMF driver hooks to the AMD SFH driver to know the user presence
>> and send the inputs to TA and if the condition is met, the TA sends
>> the action of locking the system. PMF driver generates a uevent and
>> based on the udev rule in the userland the system gets locked with
>> systemctl.
>>
>> The intent here is to provide the OEM's to make a policy to lock the
>> system when the user is away ; but the userland can make a choice to
>> ignore it.
>>
>> and so on.
>>
>> The OEMs will have an utility to create numerous such policies and
>> the policies shall be reviewed by AMD before signing and encrypting
>> them. Policies are shared between operating systems to have seemless user
>> experience.
>>
>> Since all this action has to happen via the "amdtee" driver, currently
>> there is no caller for it in the kernel which can load the amdtee driver.
>> Without amdtee driver loading onto the system the "tee" calls shall fail
>> from the PMF driver. Hence an explicit "request_module" has been added
>> to address this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig  |   1 +
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c   |  37 +++++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |  12 +++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  5 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
>> index 3064bc8ea167..437b78c6d1c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config AMD_PMF
>>  	depends on POWER_SUPPLY
>>  	depends on AMD_NB
>>  	select ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE
>> +	depends on AMDTEE
>>  	help
>>  	  This driver provides support for the AMD Platform Management Framework.
>>  	  The goal is to enhance end user experience by making AMD PCs smarter,
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
>> index 3fc5e4547d9f..d0512af2cd42 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
>> @@ -286,6 +286,43 @@ int apmf_install_handler(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static acpi_status apmf_walk_resources(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = data;
>> +
>> +	switch (res->type) {
>> +	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS64:
>> +		dev->policy_addr = res->data.address64.address.minimum;
>> +		dev->policy_sz = res->data.address64.address.address_length;
>> +		break;
>> +	case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32:
>> +		dev->policy_addr = res->data.fixed_memory32.address;
>> +		dev->policy_sz = res->data.fixed_memory32.address_length;
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!dev->policy_addr || dev->policy_sz > POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ || dev->policy_sz == 0) {
>> +		pr_err("Incorrect Policy params, possibly a SBIOS bug\n");
>> +		return AE_ERROR;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return AE_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
>> +{
>> +	acpi_handle ahandle = ACPI_HANDLE(pmf_dev->dev);
>> +	acpi_status status;
>> +
>> +	status = acpi_walk_resources(ahandle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, apmf_walk_resources, pmf_dev);
>> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> +		dev_err(pmf_dev->dev, "acpi_walk_resources failed\n");
>> +		return status;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  void apmf_acpi_deinit(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
>>  {
>>  	acpi_handle ahandle = ACPI_HANDLE(pmf_dev->dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> index 678dce4fea08..787f25511191 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
>> @@ -384,6 +384,18 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>  
>>  	dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	err = apmf_check_smart_pc(dev);
>> +	if (!err) {
>> +		/* in order for Smart PC solution to work it has a hard dependency
>> +		 * on the amdtee driver to be loaded first even before the PMF driver
>> +		 * loads. PMF ASL has a _CRS method that advertises the existence
>> +		 * of Smart PC bit. If this information is present, use this to
>> +		 * explicitly probe the amdtee driver, so that "tee" plumbing is done
>> +		 * before the PMF Smart PC init happens.
>> +		 */
> 
> But please follow no-text on /* line formatting for multiline comments. 
> Also start with a capital letter.
> 
> 
>> +		if (request_module("amdtee"))
> 
> Are you aware that this won't give you very strong guarantees about 
> anything if request_module()'s function comments is to be believed?
> 
> If that's all what you're after, MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: amdtee"); is 
> probably enough (and I unfortunately don't know the answer how to do it if 
> you want something stronger than that when you don't directly depend on 
> the symbols of the other module).

MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: amdtee"); did not help.

There is no consumer loading the 'amdtee' driver today in the kernel.
Even now with this change, the pmf driver calls the TEE subsystem APIs
that will eventually land in amdtee code.

So the call flow would be:
pmf driver-> tee subsystem -> amdtee driver -> ASP

IMO, in order to make this link work request_module() would be
required. Is that OK to retain request_module() in v3?


> 
>> +			pr_err("Failed to load amdtee. PMF Smart PC not enabled!\n");
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	rdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
>>  	if (!rdev || !pci_match_id(pmf_pci_ids, rdev)) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index 3930b8ed8333..6f4b6f4ecee4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
>>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_profile.h>
>>  
>> +#define POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ		0x4b000
>> +#define POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE		0x31535024
>> +#define POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET		0x10
>> +#define POLICY_COOKIE_LEN		0x14
>> +
>>  /* APMF Functions */
>>  #define APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE			0
>>  #define APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS			1
>> @@ -59,8 +64,20 @@
>>  #define ARG_NONE 0
>>  #define AVG_SAMPLE_SIZE 3
>>  
>> +/* Policy Actions */
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_SPL						2
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_SPPT						3
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_FPPT						4
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_SPPT_APU_ONLY				5
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN					6
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
>> +
>>  /* TA macros */
>>  #define PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR				1
>> +#define TA_PMF_ACTION_MAX					32
>> +#define TA_PMF_UNDO_MAX						8
>> +#define MAX_OPERATION_PARAMS					4
>>  
>>  /* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
>>  struct apmf_verify_interface {
>> @@ -183,11 +200,16 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>>  	bool cnqf_supported;
>>  	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
>>  	/* Smart PC solution builder */
>> +	unsigned char *policy_buf;
>> +	u32 policy_sz;
>>  	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
>>  	struct tee_shm *fw_shm_pool;
>>  	u32 session_id;
>>  	void *shbuf;
>>  	struct delayed_work pb_work;
>> +	struct pmf_action_table *prev_data;
>> +	u64 policy_addr;
>> +	void *policy_base;
>>  	bool smart_pc_enabled;
>>  };
>>  
>> @@ -399,17 +421,129 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>>  	struct apmf_cnqf_power_set ps[APMF_CNQF_MAX];
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>> +/* Smart PC - TA internals */
>> +enum ta_slider {
>> +	TA_BEST_BATTERY, /* Best Battery */
>> +	TA_BETTER_BATTERY, /* Better Battery */
>> +	TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE, /* Better Performance */
>> +	TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE, /* Best Performance */
> 
> Align comments.
> 
>> +	TA_MAX,
>> +};
>> +
>>  /* cmd ids for TA communication */
>>  enum ta_pmf_command {
>>  	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE,
>>  	TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES,
>>  };
>>  
>> +enum ta_pmf_error_type {
>> +	TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_GENERIC,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO_VALIDATE,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_CRYPTO_VERIFY_OEM,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_POLICY_BUILDER,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_CONVERT,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_SETUP,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_PB_ENACT,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_ASD_GET_DEVICE_INFO,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_ASD_GET_DEVICE_PCIE_INFO,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_SYS_DRV_FW_VALIDATION,
>> +	TA_PMF_ERROR_TYPE_MAX,
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct pmf_action_table {
>> +	unsigned long spl; /* in mW */
>> +	unsigned long sppt; /* in mW */
>> +	unsigned long sppt_apuonly; /* in mW */
>> +	unsigned long fppt; /* in mW */
>> +	unsigned long stt_minlimit; /* in mW */
>> +	unsigned long stt_skintemp_apu; /* in C */
>> +	unsigned long stt_skintemp_hs2; /* in C */
> 
> Ditto.
> 
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Input conditions */
>> +struct ta_pmf_condition_info {
>> +	u32 power_source;
>> +	u32 bat_percentage;
>> +	u32 power_slider;
>> +	u32 lid_state;
>> +	bool user_present;
>> +	u32 rsvd1[2];
>> +	u32 monitor_count;
>> +	u32 rsvd2[2];
>> +	u32 bat_design;
>> +	u32 full_charge_capacity;
>> +	int drain_rate;
>> +	bool user_engaged;
>> +	u32 device_state;
>> +	u32 socket_power;
>> +	u32 skin_temperature;
>> +	u32 rsvd3[5];
>> +	u32 ambient_light;
>> +	u32 length;
>> +	u32 avg_c0residency;
>> +	u32 max_c0residency;
>> +	u32 s0i3_entry;
>> +	u32 gfx_busy;
>> +	u32 rsvd4[7];
>> +	bool camera_state;
>> +	u32 workload_type;
>> +	u32 display_type;
>> +	u32 display_state;
>> +	u32 rsvd5[150];
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct ta_pmf_load_policy_table {
>> +	u32 table_size;
>> +	u8 table[POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ];
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* TA initialization params */
>> +struct ta_pmf_init_table {
>> +	u32 frequency; /* SMU sampling frequency */
>> +	bool validate;
>> +	bool sku_check;
>> +	bool metadata_macrocheck;
>> +	struct ta_pmf_load_policy_table policies_table;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Everything the TA needs to Enact Policies */
>> +struct ta_pmf_enact_table {
>> +	struct ta_pmf_condition_info ev_info;
>> +	u32 name;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct ta_pmf_action {
>> +	u32 action_index;
>> +	u32 value;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* output actions from TA */
>> +struct ta_pmf_enact_result {
>> +	u32 actions_count;
>> +	struct ta_pmf_action actions_list[TA_PMF_ACTION_MAX];
>> +	u32 undo_count;
>> +	struct ta_pmf_action undo_list[TA_PMF_UNDO_MAX];
>> +};
>> +
>> +union ta_pmf_input {
>> +	struct ta_pmf_enact_table enact_table;
>> +	struct ta_pmf_init_table init_table;
>> +};
>> +
>> +union ta_pmf_output {
>> +	struct ta_pmf_enact_result policy_apply_table;
>> +	u32 rsvd[906];
> 
> This is some size (SZ_1K?) - sizeof(ta_pmf_enact_result)? I don't know if 
> compiler would like such a construct though in the array declaration. If 
> the compiler isn't complaining it would be the most informative way to 
> state the size but if it's not happy, a comment might be useful.

This is a reserved space for future use. And that's the same way
defined in the FW as well. If I play with the sizes, the FW (PMF TA)
starts to misbehave and does not provide outputs all the time.

Like you mentioned, are you Ok if I just put a comment as "reserved
space for future use"?

Rest all remarks, I have addressed.

Thanks,
Shyam
> 
>> +};
>> +
>>  struct ta_pmf_shared_memory {
>>  	int command_id;
>>  	int resp_id;
>>  	u32 pmf_result;
>>  	u32 if_version;
>> +	union ta_pmf_output pmf_output;
>> +	union ta_pmf_input pmf_input;
>>  };
>>  
>>  /* Core Layer */
>> @@ -460,4 +594,5 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>>  /* Smart PC builder Layer*/
>>  int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>>  void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>> +int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>>  #endif /* PMF_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> index 1b3985cd7c08..15aa6e6e1050 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> @@ -42,9 +42,77 @@ static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
>>  	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long val;
>> +	int idx;
>> +
>> +	for (idx = 0; idx < out->actions_count; idx++) {
>> +		val = out->actions_list[idx].value;
>> +		switch (out->actions_list[idx].action_index) {
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_SPL:
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->spl != val) {
>> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPL, false, val, NULL);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPL : %lu\n", val);
>> +				dev->prev_data->spl = val;
> 
> Well, I'd have expected you to go u32 (and %u) here as isn't 
> out->actions_list[idx].value u32? And amd_pmf_send_cmd also takes u32.
> So unsigned long looks quite inconsistent and wasteful.
> 
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_SPPT:
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->sppt != val) {
>> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT, false, val, NULL);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPPT : %lu\n", val);
>> +				dev->prev_data->sppt = val;
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_FPPT:
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->fppt != val) {
>> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_FPPT, false, val, NULL);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update FPPT : %lu\n", val);
>> +				dev->prev_data->fppt = val;
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_SPPT_APU_ONLY:
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->sppt_apuonly != val) {
>> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT_APU_ONLY, false, val, NULL);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SPPT_APU_ONLY : %lu\n", val);
>> +				dev->prev_data->sppt_apuonly = val;
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN:
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->stt_minlimit != val) {
>> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_MIN_LIMIT, false, val, NULL);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_MIN : %lu\n", val);
>> +				dev->prev_data->stt_minlimit = val;
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU:
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_apu != val) {
>> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_APU, false, val, NULL);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_SKINTEMP_APU : %lu\n", val);
>> +				dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_apu = val;
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2:
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_hs2 != val) {
>> +				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_HS2, false, val, NULL);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update STT_SKINTEMP_HS2 : %lu\n", val);
>> +				dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_hs2 = val;
>> +			}
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
>> +	struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out = NULL;
>>  	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
>>  	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>>  	int ret = 0;
>> @@ -52,7 +120,10 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  	if (!dev->tee_ctx)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>> +	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
>>  	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
>> +	out = &ta_sm->pmf_output.policy_apply_table;
>> +
>>  	memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));
>>  	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES;
>>  	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
>> @@ -65,6 +136,12 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (ta_sm->pmf_result == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS && out->actions_count) {
>> +		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "action count:%u result:%x\n", out->actions_count,
>> +			ta_sm->pmf_result);
>> +		amd_pmf_apply_policies(dev, out);
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -72,6 +149,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>  	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
>>  	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
>> +	struct ta_pmf_init_table *in = NULL;
>>  	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>>  	int ret = 0;
>>  
>> @@ -80,10 +158,20 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Policy Binary size: %u bytes\n", dev->policy_sz);
>> +	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
>>  	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
>> +	in = &ta_sm->pmf_input.init_table;
>> +
>>  	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE;
>>  	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
>> +	in->metadata_macrocheck = false;
>> +	in->sku_check = false;
>> +	in->validate = true;
>> +	in->frequency = pb_actions_ms;
>> +	in->policies_table.table_size = dev->policy_sz;
>>  
>> +	memcpy(in->policies_table.table, dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_sz);
>>  	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_INITIALIZE, &arg, param);
>>  
>>  	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
>> @@ -103,6 +191,47 @@ static void amd_pmf_invoke_cmd(struct work_struct *work)
>>  	schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms));
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	u32 cookie, length;
>> +	int res;
>> +
>> +	cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET);
>> +	length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN);
>> +
>> +	if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/* update the actual length */
>> +	dev->policy_sz = length + 512;
>> +	res = amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_init(dev);
>> +	if (res == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS) {
>> +		/* now its safe to announce that smart pc is enabled */
>> +		dev->smart_pc_enabled = 1;
>> +		schedule_delayed_work(&dev->pb_work, msecs_to_jiffies(pb_actions_ms * 3));
> 
> Why * 3? Explain in comment if you feel it's necessary as it's not 
> obvious.
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary

[Ilpo Järvinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6145 bytes --]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> On 10/4/2023 5:30 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> > 
> >> PMF Policy binary is a encrypted and signed binary that will be part
> >> of the BIOS. PMF driver via the ACPI interface checks the existence
> >> of Smart PC bit. If the advertised bit is found, PMF driver walks
> >> the acpi namespace to find out the policy binary size and the address
> >> which has to be passed to the TA during the TA init sequence.
> >>
> >> The policy binary is comprised of inputs (or the events) and outputs
> >> (or the actions). With the PMF ecosystem, OEMs generate the policy
> >> binary (or could be multiple binaries) that contains a supported set
> >> of inputs and outputs which could be specifically carved out for each
> >> usage segment (or for each user also) that could influence the system
> >> behavior either by enriching the user experience or/and boost/throttle
> >> power limits.
> >>
> >> Once the TA init command succeeds, the PMF driver sends the changing
> >> events in the current environment to the TA for a constant sampling
> >> frequency time (the event here could be a lid close or open) and
> >> if the policy binary has corresponding action built within it, the
> >> TA sends the action for it in the subsequent enact command.
> >>
> >> If the inputs sent to the TA has no output defined in the policy
> >> binary generated by OEMs, there will be no action to be performed
> >> by the PMF driver.
> >>
> >> Example policies:
> >>
> >> 1) if slider is performance ; set the SPL to 40W
> >> Here PMF driver registers with the platform profile interface and
> >> when the slider position is changed, PMF driver lets the TA know
> >> about this. TA sends back an action to update the Sustained
> >> Power Limit (SPL). PMF driver updates this limit via the PMFW mailbox.
> >>
> >> 2) if user_away ; then lock the system
> >> Here PMF driver hooks to the AMD SFH driver to know the user presence
> >> and send the inputs to TA and if the condition is met, the TA sends
> >> the action of locking the system. PMF driver generates a uevent and
> >> based on the udev rule in the userland the system gets locked with
> >> systemctl.
> >>
> >> The intent here is to provide the OEM's to make a policy to lock the
> >> system when the user is away ; but the userland can make a choice to
> >> ignore it.
> >>
> >> and so on.
> >>
> >> The OEMs will have an utility to create numerous such policies and
> >> the policies shall be reviewed by AMD before signing and encrypting
> >> them. Policies are shared between operating systems to have seemless user
> >> experience.
> >>
> >> Since all this action has to happen via the "amdtee" driver, currently
> >> there is no caller for it in the kernel which can load the amdtee driver.
> >> Without amdtee driver loading onto the system the "tee" calls shall fail
> >> from the PMF driver. Hence an explicit "request_module" has been added
> >> to address this.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>

> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> index 678dce4fea08..787f25511191 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> @@ -384,6 +384,18 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  		return -ENOMEM;
> >>  
> >>  	dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> +	err = apmf_check_smart_pc(dev);
> >> +	if (!err) {
> >> +		/* in order for Smart PC solution to work it has a hard dependency
> >> +		 * on the amdtee driver to be loaded first even before the PMF driver
> >> +		 * loads. PMF ASL has a _CRS method that advertises the existence
> >> +		 * of Smart PC bit. If this information is present, use this to
> >> +		 * explicitly probe the amdtee driver, so that "tee" plumbing is done
> >> +		 * before the PMF Smart PC init happens.
> >> +		 */
> > 
> > But please follow no-text on /* line formatting for multiline comments. 
> > Also start with a capital letter.
> > 
> > 
> >> +		if (request_module("amdtee"))
> > 
> > Are you aware that this won't give you very strong guarantees about 
> > anything if request_module()'s function comments is to be believed?
> > 
> > If that's all what you're after, MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: amdtee"); is 
> > probably enough (and I unfortunately don't know the answer how to do it if 
> > you want something stronger than that when you don't directly depend on 
> > the symbols of the other module).
> 
> MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: amdtee"); did not help.

So how was this module loaded then? I suppose if the user does insmod, the 
softdep wouldn't be honored but modprobe should load the dependencies 
first.

> There is no consumer loading the 'amdtee' driver today in the kernel.
> Even now with this change, the pmf driver calls the TEE subsystem APIs
> that will eventually land in amdtee code.
>
> So the call flow would be:
> pmf driver-> tee subsystem -> amdtee driver -> ASP

Right, and that indirect route is why it won't be made as hard 
dependency.

> IMO, in order to make this link work request_module() would be
> required. Is that OK to retain request_module() in v3?

Fine.

> >> +	struct ta_pmf_enact_result policy_apply_table;
> >> +	u32 rsvd[906];
> > 
> > This is some size (SZ_1K?) - sizeof(ta_pmf_enact_result)? I don't know if 
> > compiler would like such a construct though in the array declaration. If 
> > the compiler isn't complaining it would be the most informative way to 
> > state the size but if it's not happy, a comment might be useful.
> 
> This is a reserved space for future use. And that's the same way
> defined in the FW as well. If I play with the sizes, the FW (PMF TA)
> starts to misbehave and does not provide outputs all the time.
> 
> Like you mentioned, are you Ok if I just put a comment as "reserved
> space for future use"?

You can put the comment if you want but I understood that even without 
the comment. I was just interested in how that magic number 906 was 
derived and if it could have been better defined.

I think you can leave the line as is.

-- 
 i.

[PATCH v2 05/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: change amd_pmf_init_features() call sequence

[Shyam Sundar S K]

To sideload pmf policy binaries, the Smart PC Solution Builder provides a
debugfs file called "update_policy"; that gets created under a new debugfs
directory called "pb" and this new directory has to be associated with
existing parent directory for PMF driver called "amd_pmf".

In the current code structure, amd_pmf_dbgfs_register() is called after
amd_pmf_init_features(). This will not help when the Smart PC builder
feature has to be assoicated to the parent directory.

Hence change the order of amd_pmf_dbgfs_register() and call it before
amd_pmf_init_features() so that when the Smart PC init happens, it has the
parent debugfs directory to get itself hooked.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
index 787f25511191..39671d245e96 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
@@ -435,9 +435,9 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	apmf_acpi_init(dev);
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
+	amd_pmf_dbgfs_register(dev);
 	amd_pmf_init_features(dev);
 	apmf_install_handler(dev);
-	amd_pmf_dbgfs_register(dev);
 
 	dev_info(dev->dev, "registered PMF device successfully\n");
 
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 06/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to get inputs from other subsystems

[Shyam Sundar S K]

PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
the conditions in the policy binary.

Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
information from other subsystems in the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   2 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  18 ++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |   3 +
 4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
index d2746ee7369f..6b26e48ce8ad 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
 amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
 		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
-		tee-if.o
+		tee-if.o spc.o
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 6f4b6f4ecee4..60b11455dadf 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -149,6 +149,21 @@ struct smu_pmf_metrics {
 	u16 infra_gfx_maxfreq; /* in MHz */
 	u16 skin_temp; /* in centi-Celsius */
 	u16 device_state;
+	u16 curtemp; /* in centi-Celsius */
+	u16 filter_alpha_value;
+	u16 avg_gfx_clkfrequency;
+	u16 avg_fclk_frequency;
+	u16 avg_gfx_activity;
+	u16 avg_socclk_frequency;
+	u16 avg_vclk_frequency;
+	u16 avg_vcn_activity;
+	u16 avg_dram_reads;
+	u16 avg_dram_writes;
+	u16 avg_socket_power;
+	u16 avg_core_power[2];
+	u16 avg_core_c0residency[16];
+	u16 spare1;
+	u32 metrics_counter;
 } __packed;
 
 enum amd_stt_skin_temp {
@@ -595,4 +610,7 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
 int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
+
+/* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
+void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
 #endif /* PMF_H */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
+ *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
+ */
+
+#include <acpi/button.h>
+#include <linux/power_supply.h>
+#include <linux/units.h>
+#include "pmf.h"
+
+static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	u16 max, avg = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
+	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
+	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
+
+	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
+	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
+
+	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
+		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
+
+	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
+	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
+	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
+		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
+			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
+	}
+
+	in->ev_info.avg_c0residency = avg / ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency);
+	in->ev_info.max_c0residency = max;
+	in->ev_info.gfx_busy = dev->m_table.avg_gfx_activity;
+}
+
+static const char * const pmf_battery_supply_name[] = {
+	"BATT",
+	"BAT0",
+};
+
+static int get_battery_prop(enum power_supply_property prop)
+{
+	union power_supply_propval value;
+	struct power_supply *psy;
+	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmf_battery_supply_name); i++) {
+		psy = power_supply_get_by_name(pmf_battery_supply_name[i]);
+		if (!psy)
+			continue;
+
+		ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &value);
+		if (ret) {
+			power_supply_put(psy);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return value.intval;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_get_battery_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	int val;
+
+	val = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT);
+	if (val != 1)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	in->ev_info.bat_percentage = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY);
+	/* all values in mWh metrics */
+	in->ev_info.bat_design = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN) / MILLI;
+	in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL) / MILLI;
+	in->ev_info.drain_rate = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW) / MILLI;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_get_slider_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	int val;
+
+	switch (dev->current_profile) {
+	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE:
+		val = TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE;
+		break;
+	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED:
+		val = TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE;
+		break;
+	case PLATFORM_PROFILE_LOW_POWER:
+		val = TA_BEST_BATTERY;
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "Unknown Platform Profile.\n");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+	in->ev_info.power_slider = val;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	/* TA side lid open is 1 and close is 0, hence the ! here */
+	in->ev_info.lid_state = !acpi_lid_open();
+	in->ev_info.power_source = amd_pmf_get_power_source();
+	amd_pmf_get_smu_info(dev, in);
+	amd_pmf_get_battery_info(dev, in);
+	amd_pmf_get_slider_info(dev, in);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 15aa6e6e1050..1fc3b57f8d78 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
 	struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out = NULL;
+	struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in = NULL;
 	struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
 	struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -123,11 +124,13 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
 	ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
 	out = &ta_sm->pmf_output.policy_apply_table;
+	in = &ta_sm->pmf_input.enact_table;
 
 	memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));
 	ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES;
 	ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR;
 
+	amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(dev, in);
 	amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER_ENACT_POLICIES, &arg, param);
 
 	ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to get inputs from other subsystems

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
> the conditions in the policy binary.
> 
> Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
> information from other subsystems in the kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   2 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  18 ++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |   3 +
>  4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> index d2746ee7369f..6b26e48ce8ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
>  		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
> -		tee-if.o
> +		tee-if.o spc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 6f4b6f4ecee4..60b11455dadf 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -149,6 +149,21 @@ struct smu_pmf_metrics {
>  	u16 infra_gfx_maxfreq; /* in MHz */
>  	u16 skin_temp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>  	u16 device_state;
> +	u16 curtemp; /* in centi-Celsius */
> +	u16 filter_alpha_value;
> +	u16 avg_gfx_clkfrequency;
> +	u16 avg_fclk_frequency;
> +	u16 avg_gfx_activity;
> +	u16 avg_socclk_frequency;
> +	u16 avg_vclk_frequency;
> +	u16 avg_vcn_activity;
> +	u16 avg_dram_reads;
> +	u16 avg_dram_writes;
> +	u16 avg_socket_power;
> +	u16 avg_core_power[2];
> +	u16 avg_core_c0residency[16];
> +	u16 spare1;
> +	u32 metrics_counter;
>  } __packed;
>  
>  enum amd_stt_skin_temp {
> @@ -595,4 +610,7 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>  int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
> +
> +/* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
> +void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
>  #endif /* PMF_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + * All Rights Reserved.
> + *
> + * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> + *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <acpi/button.h>
> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
> +#include <linux/units.h>
> +#include "pmf.h"
> +
> +static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
> +{
> +	u16 max, avg = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> +	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
> +	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> +
> +	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
> +	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
> +
> +	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
> +		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> +
> +	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
> +	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
> +	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
> +		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
> +			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> +	}

My comments weren't either answered adequately or changes made here.
Please check the v1 comments. I hope it's not because you feel hurry to 
get the next version out...

I'm still unsure if the u16 thing can overflow because I don't know what's 
the max value for avg_core_c0residency[i].

> +
> +	in->ev_info.avg_c0residency = avg / ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency);
> +	in->ev_info.max_c0residency = max;
> +	in->ev_info.gfx_busy = dev->m_table.avg_gfx_activity;
> +}
> +
> +static const char * const pmf_battery_supply_name[] = {
> +	"BATT",
> +	"BAT0",
> +};
> +
> +static int get_battery_prop(enum power_supply_property prop)
> +{
> +	union power_supply_propval value;
> +	struct power_supply *psy;
> +	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmf_battery_supply_name); i++) {
> +		psy = power_supply_get_by_name(pmf_battery_supply_name[i]);
> +		if (!psy)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &value);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			power_supply_put(psy);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return value.intval;
> +}
> +
> +static int amd_pmf_get_battery_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
> +{
> +	int val;
> +
> +	val = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT);
> +	if (val != 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	in->ev_info.bat_percentage = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY);
> +	/* all values in mWh metrics */
> +	in->ev_info.bat_design = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN) / MILLI;
> +	in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL) / MILLI;
> +	in->ev_info.drain_rate = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW) / MILLI;

There are defines specifically for watts so you should use them rather 
than generic MILLI.


-- 
 i.

Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to get inputs from other subsystems

[Shyam Sundar S K]

On 10/4/2023 5:44 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> 
>> PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
>> the conditions in the policy binary.
>>
>> Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
>> information from other subsystems in the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   2 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  18 ++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |   3 +
>>  4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> index d2746ee7369f..6b26e48ce8ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>>  amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
>>  		auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
>> -		tee-if.o
>> +		tee-if.o spc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index 6f4b6f4ecee4..60b11455dadf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -149,6 +149,21 @@ struct smu_pmf_metrics {
>>  	u16 infra_gfx_maxfreq; /* in MHz */
>>  	u16 skin_temp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>>  	u16 device_state;
>> +	u16 curtemp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>> +	u16 filter_alpha_value;
>> +	u16 avg_gfx_clkfrequency;
>> +	u16 avg_fclk_frequency;
>> +	u16 avg_gfx_activity;
>> +	u16 avg_socclk_frequency;
>> +	u16 avg_vclk_frequency;
>> +	u16 avg_vcn_activity;
>> +	u16 avg_dram_reads;
>> +	u16 avg_dram_writes;
>> +	u16 avg_socket_power;
>> +	u16 avg_core_power[2];
>> +	u16 avg_core_c0residency[16];
>> +	u16 spare1;
>> +	u32 metrics_counter;
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>>  enum amd_stt_skin_temp {
>> @@ -595,4 +610,7 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>>  int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>>  void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>>  int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>> +
>> +/* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
>> +void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
>>  #endif /* PMF_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + * All Rights Reserved.
>> + *
>> + * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> + *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <acpi/button.h>
>> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
>> +#include <linux/units.h>
>> +#include "pmf.h"
>> +
>> +static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> +	u16 max, avg = 0;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
>> +	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
>> +	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
>> +
>> +	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
>> +	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
>> +
>> +	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
>> +		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
>> +
>> +	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
>> +	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
>> +	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
>> +		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
>> +			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
>> +	}
> 
> My comments weren't either answered adequately or changes made here.
> Please check the v1 comments. I hope it's not because you feel hurry to 
> get the next version out...
> 
> I'm still unsure if the u16 thing can overflow because I don't know what's 
> the max value for avg_core_c0residency[i].

the highest value for avg_core_c0residency[i] is merely a small number
and hence I retained the avg variable as u16. Not sure if there a
'real' case where it can overflow.

Sorry, I missed to merge both into a single for loop. I will address
this in v3.

Thanks,
Shyam

> 
>> +
>> +	in->ev_info.avg_c0residency = avg / ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency);
>> +	in->ev_info.max_c0residency = max;
>> +	in->ev_info.gfx_busy = dev->m_table.avg_gfx_activity;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char * const pmf_battery_supply_name[] = {
>> +	"BATT",
>> +	"BAT0",
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int get_battery_prop(enum power_supply_property prop)
>> +{
>> +	union power_supply_propval value;
>> +	struct power_supply *psy;
>> +	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmf_battery_supply_name); i++) {
>> +		psy = power_supply_get_by_name(pmf_battery_supply_name[i]);
>> +		if (!psy)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &value);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			power_supply_put(psy);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return value.intval;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_pmf_get_battery_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> +	int val;
>> +
>> +	val = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT);
>> +	if (val != 1)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	in->ev_info.bat_percentage = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY);
>> +	/* all values in mWh metrics */
>> +	in->ev_info.bat_design = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN) / MILLI;
>> +	in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL) / MILLI;
>> +	in->ev_info.drain_rate = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW) / MILLI;
> 
> There are defines specifically for watts so you should use them rather 
> than generic MILLI.
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to get inputs from other subsystems

[Ilpo Järvinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2925 bytes --]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> On 10/4/2023 5:44 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> > 
> >> PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
> >> the conditions in the policy binary.
> >>
> >> Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
> >> information from other subsystems in the kernel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>

> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..3113bde051d9
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +/*
> >> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> >> + * All Rights Reserved.
> >> + *
> >> + * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> >> + *          Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <acpi/button.h>
> >> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
> >> +#include <linux/units.h>
> >> +#include "pmf.h"
> >> +
> >> +static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
> >> +{
> >> +	u16 max, avg = 0;
> >> +	int i;
> >> +
> >> +	memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> >> +	amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
> >> +	memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> >> +
> >> +	in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
> >> +	in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
> >> +
> >> +	/* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
> >> +		avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> >> +
> >> +	/* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
> >> +	max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
> >> +	for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
> >> +		if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
> >> +			max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
> >> +	}
> > 
> > My comments weren't either answered adequately or changes made here.
> > Please check the v1 comments. I hope it's not because you feel hurry to 
> > get the next version out...
> > 
> > I'm still unsure if the u16 thing can overflow because I don't know what's 
> > the max value for avg_core_c0residency[i].
> 
> the highest value for avg_core_c0residency[i] is merely a small number
> and hence I retained the avg variable as u16. Not sure if there a
> 'real' case where it can overflow.

Okay, if you think it's fine, no problem with it then (not that there's 
a big advantage having it as u16 instead of e.g. unsigned int).

> Sorry, I missed to merge both into a single for loop. I will address
> this in v3.

Thanks.

-- 
 i.

[PATCH v2 07/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support update p3t limit

[Shyam Sundar S K]

P3T (Peak Package Power Limit) is a metric within the SMU controller
that can influence the power limits. Add support from the driver
to update P3T limits accordingly.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    | 3 +++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 60b11455dadf..d5e410c41e81 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
 #define GET_STT_MIN_LIMIT	0x1F
 #define GET_STT_LIMIT_APU	0x20
 #define GET_STT_LIMIT_HS2	0x21
+#define SET_P3T				0x23 /* P3T: Peak Package Power Limit */
 
 /* OS slider update notification */
 #define DC_BEST_PERF		0
@@ -72,6 +73,7 @@
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN					6
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
+#define PMF_POLICY_P3T						38
 
 /* TA macros */
 #define PMF_TA_IF_VERSION_MAJOR				1
@@ -475,6 +477,7 @@ struct pmf_action_table {
 	unsigned long stt_minlimit; /* in mW */
 	unsigned long stt_skintemp_apu; /* in C */
 	unsigned long stt_skintemp_hs2; /* in C */
+	unsigned long p3t_limit; /* in mW */
 };
 
 /* Input conditions */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 1fc3b57f8d78..315e3d2eacdf 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -105,6 +105,14 @@ static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_
 				dev->prev_data->stt_skintemp_hs2 = val;
 			}
 			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_P3T:
+			if (dev->prev_data->p3t_limit != val) {
+				amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_P3T, false, val, NULL);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update P3T : %lu\n", val);
+				dev->prev_data->p3t_limit = val;
+			}
+			break;
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 08/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to update system state

[Shyam Sundar S K]

PMF driver based on the output actions from the TA can request to update
the system states like entering s0i3, lock screen etc. by generating
an uevent. Based on the udev rules set in the userspace the event id
matching the uevent shall get updated accordingly using the systemctl.

Sample udev rules under Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309260515.5XbR6N0g-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst   |  1 +
 Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst     | 25 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  9 ++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
index 43ea35613dfc..fb40a1f6f79e 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ configure specific aspects of kernel behavior to your liking.
    parport
    perf-security
    pm/index
+   pmf
    pnp
    rapidio
    ras
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..90072add511e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+Set udev rules for PMF Smart PC Builder
+---------------------------------------
+
+AMD PMF(Platform Management Framework) Smart PC Solution builder has to set the system states
+like S0i3, Screen lock, hibernate etc, based on the output actions provided by the PMF
+TA (Trusted Application).
+
+In order for this to work the PMF driver generates a uevent for userspace to react to. Below are
+sample udev rules that can facilitate this experience when a machine has PMF Smart PC solution builder
+enabled.
+
+Please add the following line(s) to
+``/etc/udev/rules.d/99-local.rules``::
+
+        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="1", RUN+="/usr/bin/systemctl suspend"
+        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="2", RUN+="/usr/bin/systemctl hibernate"
+        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="3", RUN+="/bin/loginctl lock-sessions"
+
+EVENT_ID values:
+1= Put the system to S0i3/S2Idle
+2= Put the system to hibernate
+3= Lock the screen
+
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index d5e410c41e81..34778192432e 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN					6
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
+#define PMF_POLICY_SYSTEM_STATE					9
 #define PMF_POLICY_P3T						38
 
 /* TA macros */
@@ -439,6 +440,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
 } __packed;
 
 /* Smart PC - TA internals */
+enum system_state {
+	SYSTEM_STATE__S0i3 = 1,
+	SYSTEM_STATE__S4,
+	SYSTEM_STATE__SCREEN_LOCK,
+	SYSTEM_STATE__MAX
+};
+
 enum ta_slider {
 	TA_BEST_BATTERY, /* Best Battery */
 	TA_BETTER_BATTERY, /* Better Battery */
@@ -470,6 +478,7 @@ enum ta_pmf_error_type {
 };
 
 struct pmf_action_table {
+	enum system_state system_state;
 	unsigned long spl; /* in mW */
 	unsigned long sppt; /* in mW */
 	unsigned long sppt_apuonly; /* in mW */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 315e3d2eacdf..961011530c1b 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -24,6 +24,20 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_actions_ms, "Policy binary actions sampling frequency (defau
 static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
 						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
 
+static const char *amd_pmf_uevent_as_str(unsigned int state)
+{
+	switch (state) {
+	case SYSTEM_STATE__S0i3:
+		return "S0i3";
+	case SYSTEM_STATE__S4:
+		return "S4";
+	case SYSTEM_STATE__SCREEN_LOCK:
+		return "SCREEN_LOCK";
+	default:
+		return "Unknown Smart PC event";
+	}
+}
+
 static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
 				 struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *arg,
 				 struct tee_param *param)
@@ -42,9 +56,23 @@ static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
 	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
 }
 
+static int amd_pmf_update_uevents(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u16 event)
+{
+	char *envp[2] = {};
+
+	envp[0] = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "EVENT_ID=%d", event);
+	if (!envp[0])
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	kobject_uevent_env(&dev->dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
+
+	kfree(envp[0]);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
 {
-	unsigned long val;
+	unsigned long val, event = 0;
 	int idx;
 
 	for (idx = 0; idx < out->actions_count; idx++) {
@@ -113,6 +141,17 @@ static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_
 				dev->prev_data->p3t_limit = val;
 			}
 			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_SYSTEM_STATE:
+			event = val + 1;
+			if (dev->prev_data->system_state != event) {
+				amd_pmf_update_uevents(dev, event);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SYSTEM_STATE : %s\n",
+					amd_pmf_uevent_as_str(event));
+				/* reset the previous recorded state to zero */
+				dev->prev_data->system_state = 0;
+			}
+			break;
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to update system state

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> PMF driver based on the output actions from the TA can request to update
> the system states like entering s0i3, lock screen etc. by generating
> an uevent. Based on the udev rules set in the userspace the event id
> matching the uevent shall get updated accordingly using the systemctl.
> 
> Sample udev rules under Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309260515.5XbR6N0g-lkp@intel.com/

Please don't put lkp tags for patches that are still under development 
(even if the email you get misleadingly instructs you to). Only use them 
when you fix code that's already in tree based on LKP's report.

> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst   |  1 +
>  Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst     | 25 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  9 ++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
> index 43ea35613dfc..fb40a1f6f79e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ configure specific aspects of kernel behavior to your liking.
>     parport
>     perf-security
>     pm/index
> +   pmf
>     pnp
>     rapidio
>     ras
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..90072add511e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +Set udev rules for PMF Smart PC Builder
> +---------------------------------------
> +
> +AMD PMF(Platform Management Framework) Smart PC Solution builder has to set the system states
> +like S0i3, Screen lock, hibernate etc, based on the output actions provided by the PMF
> +TA (Trusted Application).
> +
> +In order for this to work the PMF driver generates a uevent for userspace to react to. Below are
> +sample udev rules that can facilitate this experience when a machine has PMF Smart PC solution builder
> +enabled.
> +
> +Please add the following line(s) to
> +``/etc/udev/rules.d/99-local.rules``::
> +
> +        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="1", RUN+="/usr/bin/systemctl suspend"
> +        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="2", RUN+="/usr/bin/systemctl hibernate"
> +        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="3", RUN+="/bin/loginctl lock-sessions"
> +
> +EVENT_ID values:
> +1= Put the system to S0i3/S2Idle
> +2= Put the system to hibernate
> +3= Lock the screen
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index d5e410c41e81..34778192432e 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>  #define PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN					6
>  #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
>  #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
> +#define PMF_POLICY_SYSTEM_STATE					9
>  #define PMF_POLICY_P3T						38
>  
>  /* TA macros */
> @@ -439,6 +440,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>  } __packed;
>  
>  /* Smart PC - TA internals */
> +enum system_state {
> +	SYSTEM_STATE__S0i3 = 1,
> +	SYSTEM_STATE__S4,
> +	SYSTEM_STATE__SCREEN_LOCK,
> +	SYSTEM_STATE__MAX
> +};
> +
>  enum ta_slider {
>  	TA_BEST_BATTERY, /* Best Battery */
>  	TA_BETTER_BATTERY, /* Better Battery */
> @@ -470,6 +478,7 @@ enum ta_pmf_error_type {
>  };
>  
>  struct pmf_action_table {
> +	enum system_state system_state;
>  	unsigned long spl; /* in mW */
>  	unsigned long sppt; /* in mW */
>  	unsigned long sppt_apuonly; /* in mW */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> index 315e3d2eacdf..961011530c1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,20 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_actions_ms, "Policy binary actions sampling frequency (defau
>  static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
>  						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
>  
> +static const char *amd_pmf_uevent_as_str(unsigned int state)
> +{
> +	switch (state) {
> +	case SYSTEM_STATE__S0i3:
> +		return "S0i3";
> +	case SYSTEM_STATE__S4:
> +		return "S4";
> +	case SYSTEM_STATE__SCREEN_LOCK:
> +		return "SCREEN_LOCK";
> +	default:
> +		return "Unknown Smart PC event";
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
>  				 struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *arg,
>  				 struct tee_param *param)
> @@ -42,9 +56,23 @@ static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
>  	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int amd_pmf_update_uevents(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u16 event)
> +{
> +	char *envp[2] = {};
> +
> +	envp[0] = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "EVENT_ID=%d", event);
> +	if (!envp[0])
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	kobject_uevent_env(&dev->dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
> +
> +	kfree(envp[0]);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
>  {
> -	unsigned long val;
> +	unsigned long val, event = 0;
>  	int idx;
>  
>  	for (idx = 0; idx < out->actions_count; idx++) {
> @@ -113,6 +141,17 @@ static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_
>  				dev->prev_data->p3t_limit = val;
>  			}
>  			break;
> +
> +		case PMF_POLICY_SYSTEM_STATE:
> +			event = val + 1;
> +			if (dev->prev_data->system_state != event) {
> +				amd_pmf_update_uevents(dev, event);
> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SYSTEM_STATE : %s\n",
> +					amd_pmf_uevent_as_str(event));
> +				/* reset the previous recorded state to zero */
> +				dev->prev_data->system_state = 0;

No, a comment won't help you here. As is, system_state is constant 0 so 
it's entirely unnecessary to keep that value at all. In fact, the comment 
is wrong because there never was "previously recorder state" in 
->system_state to begin with since it's either initialized to zero on 
alloc or reset to zero by this line.

So what are you trying to achieve here with this ->system_state variable?

-- 
 i.

Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to update system state

[Shyam Sundar S K]

On 10/4/2023 5:53 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> 
>> PMF driver based on the output actions from the TA can request to update
>> the system states like entering s0i3, lock screen etc. by generating
>> an uevent. Based on the udev rules set in the userspace the event id
>> matching the uevent shall get updated accordingly using the systemctl.
>>
>> Sample udev rules under Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309260515.5XbR6N0g-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> Please don't put lkp tags for patches that are still under development 
> (even if the email you get misleadingly instructs you to). Only use them 
> when you fix code that's already in tree based on LKP's report.

Agreed.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst   |  1 +
>>  Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst     | 25 ++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  9 ++++++
>>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
>> index 43ea35613dfc..fb40a1f6f79e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst
>> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ configure specific aspects of kernel behavior to your liking.
>>     parport
>>     perf-security
>>     pm/index
>> +   pmf
>>     pnp
>>     rapidio
>>     ras
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..90072add511e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pmf.rst
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +Set udev rules for PMF Smart PC Builder
>> +---------------------------------------
>> +
>> +AMD PMF(Platform Management Framework) Smart PC Solution builder has to set the system states
>> +like S0i3, Screen lock, hibernate etc, based on the output actions provided by the PMF
>> +TA (Trusted Application).
>> +
>> +In order for this to work the PMF driver generates a uevent for userspace to react to. Below are
>> +sample udev rules that can facilitate this experience when a machine has PMF Smart PC solution builder
>> +enabled.
>> +
>> +Please add the following line(s) to
>> +``/etc/udev/rules.d/99-local.rules``::
>> +
>> +        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="1", RUN+="/usr/bin/systemctl suspend"
>> +        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="2", RUN+="/usr/bin/systemctl hibernate"
>> +        DRIVERS=="amd-pmf", ACTION=="change", ENV{EVENT_ID}=="3", RUN+="/bin/loginctl lock-sessions"
>> +
>> +EVENT_ID values:
>> +1= Put the system to S0i3/S2Idle
>> +2= Put the system to hibernate
>> +3= Lock the screen
>> +
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index d5e410c41e81..34778192432e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
>>  #define PMF_POLICY_STT_MIN					6
>>  #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
>>  #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
>> +#define PMF_POLICY_SYSTEM_STATE					9
>>  #define PMF_POLICY_P3T						38
>>  
>>  /* TA macros */
>> @@ -439,6 +440,13 @@ struct apmf_dyn_slider_output {
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>>  /* Smart PC - TA internals */
>> +enum system_state {
>> +	SYSTEM_STATE__S0i3 = 1,
>> +	SYSTEM_STATE__S4,
>> +	SYSTEM_STATE__SCREEN_LOCK,
>> +	SYSTEM_STATE__MAX
>> +};
>> +
>>  enum ta_slider {
>>  	TA_BEST_BATTERY, /* Best Battery */
>>  	TA_BETTER_BATTERY, /* Better Battery */
>> @@ -470,6 +478,7 @@ enum ta_pmf_error_type {
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct pmf_action_table {
>> +	enum system_state system_state;
>>  	unsigned long spl; /* in mW */
>>  	unsigned long sppt; /* in mW */
>>  	unsigned long sppt_apuonly; /* in mW */
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> index 315e3d2eacdf..961011530c1b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,20 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_actions_ms, "Policy binary actions sampling frequency (defau
>>  static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
>>  						0xb1, 0x2d, 0xc5, 0x29, 0xb1, 0x3d, 0x85, 0x43);
>>  
>> +static const char *amd_pmf_uevent_as_str(unsigned int state)
>> +{
>> +	switch (state) {
>> +	case SYSTEM_STATE__S0i3:
>> +		return "S0i3";
>> +	case SYSTEM_STATE__S4:
>> +		return "S4";
>> +	case SYSTEM_STATE__SCREEN_LOCK:
>> +		return "SCREEN_LOCK";
>> +	default:
>> +		return "Unknown Smart PC event";
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
>>  				 struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *arg,
>>  				 struct tee_param *param)
>> @@ -42,9 +56,23 @@ static void amd_pmf_prepare_args(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int cmd,
>>  	param[0].u.memref.shm_offs = 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int amd_pmf_update_uevents(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u16 event)
>> +{
>> +	char *envp[2] = {};
>> +
>> +	envp[0] = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "EVENT_ID=%d", event);
>> +	if (!envp[0])
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	kobject_uevent_env(&dev->dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, envp);
>> +
>> +	kfree(envp[0]);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
>>  {
>> -	unsigned long val;
>> +	unsigned long val, event = 0;
>>  	int idx;
>>  
>>  	for (idx = 0; idx < out->actions_count; idx++) {
>> @@ -113,6 +141,17 @@ static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_
>>  				dev->prev_data->p3t_limit = val;
>>  			}
>>  			break;
>> +
>> +		case PMF_POLICY_SYSTEM_STATE:
>> +			event = val + 1;
>> +			if (dev->prev_data->system_state != event) {
>> +				amd_pmf_update_uevents(dev, event);
>> +				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update SYSTEM_STATE : %s\n",
>> +					amd_pmf_uevent_as_str(event));
>> +				/* reset the previous recorded state to zero */
>> +				dev->prev_data->system_state = 0;
> 
> No, a comment won't help you here. As is, system_state is constant 0 so 
> it's entirely unnecessary to keep that value at all. In fact, the comment 
> is wrong because there never was "previously recorder state" in 
> ->system_state to begin with since it's either initialized to zero on 
> alloc or reset to zero by this line.
> 
> So what are you trying to achieve here with this ->system_state variable?

Sorry I misunderstood your previous remark. This was a test code which
was supposed to be cleaned up before sending.

I will fix this in v3.

Thanks,
Shyam


> 

[PATCH v2 09/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add facility to dump TA inputs

[Shyam Sundar S K]

PMF driver sends constant inputs to TA which its gets via the other
subsystems in the kernel. To debug certain TA issues knowing what inputs
being sent to TA becomes critical. Add debug facility to the driver which
can isolate Smart PC and TA related issues.

Also, make source_as_str() as non-static function as this helper is
required outside of sps.c file.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  3 +++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c    |  2 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |  1 +
 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 34778192432e..2ad5ece47601 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ int apmf_get_static_slider_granular(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev,
 bool is_pprof_balanced(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
 int amd_pmf_power_slider_update_event(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
 
+const char *source_as_str(unsigned int state);
 
 int apmf_update_fan_idx(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev, bool manual, u32 idx);
 int amd_pmf_set_sps_power_limits(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
@@ -625,4 +626,6 @@ int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
 
 /* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
 void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
+void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
+
 #endif /* PMF_H */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
index 3113bde051d9..3aee78629cce 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
@@ -14,6 +14,43 @@
 #include <linux/units.h>
 #include "pmf.h"
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
+static const char *ta_slider_as_str(unsigned int state)
+{
+	switch (state) {
+	case TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE:
+		return "PERFORMANCE";
+	case TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE:
+		return "BALANCED";
+	case TA_BEST_BATTERY:
+		return "POWER_SAVER";
+	default:
+		return "Unknown TA Slider State";
+	}
+}
+
+void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "==== TA inputs START ====\n");
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Slider State : %s\n", ta_slider_as_str(in->ev_info.power_slider));
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Power Source : %s\n", source_as_str(in->ev_info.power_source));
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Battery Percentage : %u\n", in->ev_info.bat_percentage);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Designed Battery Capacity : %u\n", in->ev_info.bat_design);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Fully Charged Capacity : %u\n", in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Drain Rate : %d\n", in->ev_info.drain_rate);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Socket Power : %u\n", in->ev_info.socket_power);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Skin Temperature : %u\n", in->ev_info.skin_temperature);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Avg C0 Residency : %u\n", in->ev_info.avg_c0residency);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Max C0 Residency : %u\n", in->ev_info.max_c0residency);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "GFX Busy : %u\n", in->ev_info.gfx_busy);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Connected Display Count : %u\n", in->ev_info.monitor_count);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "LID State : %s\n", in->ev_info.lid_state ? "Close" : "Open");
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "==== TA inputs END ====\n");
+}
+#else
+void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in) {}
+#endif
+
 static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
 {
 	u16 max, avg = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
index a70e67749be3..13e36b52dfe8 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static const char *slider_as_str(unsigned int state)
 	}
 }
 
-static const char *source_as_str(unsigned int state)
+const char *source_as_str(unsigned int state)
 {
 	switch (state) {
 	case POWER_SOURCE_AC:
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 961011530c1b..b0711b2f8c8f 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	}
 
 	if (ta_sm->pmf_result == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS && out->actions_count) {
+		amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(dev, in);
 		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "action count:%u result:%x\n", out->actions_count,
 			ta_sm->pmf_result);
 		amd_pmf_apply_policies(dev, out);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add facility to dump TA inputs

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> PMF driver sends constant inputs to TA which its gets via the other
> subsystems in the kernel. To debug certain TA issues knowing what inputs
> being sent to TA becomes critical. Add debug facility to the driver which
> can isolate Smart PC and TA related issues.
> 
> Also, make source_as_str() as non-static function as this helper is
> required outside of sps.c file.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  3 +++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c    | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c    |  2 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index 34778192432e..2ad5ece47601 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ int apmf_get_static_slider_granular(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev,
>  bool is_pprof_balanced(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
>  int amd_pmf_power_slider_update_event(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>  
> +const char *source_as_str(unsigned int state);

Too generic name, add prefix to the name.

-- 
 i.

>  int apmf_update_fan_idx(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev, bool manual, u32 idx);
>  int amd_pmf_set_sps_power_limits(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf);
> @@ -625,4 +626,6 @@ int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>  
>  /* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
>  void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
> +void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
> +
>  #endif /* PMF_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> index 3113bde051d9..3aee78629cce 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,43 @@
>  #include <linux/units.h>
>  #include "pmf.h"
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
> +static const char *ta_slider_as_str(unsigned int state)
> +{
> +	switch (state) {
> +	case TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE:
> +		return "PERFORMANCE";
> +	case TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE:
> +		return "BALANCED";
> +	case TA_BEST_BATTERY:
> +		return "POWER_SAVER";
> +	default:
> +		return "Unknown TA Slider State";
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
> +{
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "==== TA inputs START ====\n");
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Slider State : %s\n", ta_slider_as_str(in->ev_info.power_slider));
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Power Source : %s\n", source_as_str(in->ev_info.power_source));
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Battery Percentage : %u\n", in->ev_info.bat_percentage);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Designed Battery Capacity : %u\n", in->ev_info.bat_design);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Fully Charged Capacity : %u\n", in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Drain Rate : %d\n", in->ev_info.drain_rate);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Socket Power : %u\n", in->ev_info.socket_power);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Skin Temperature : %u\n", in->ev_info.skin_temperature);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Avg C0 Residency : %u\n", in->ev_info.avg_c0residency);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Max C0 Residency : %u\n", in->ev_info.max_c0residency);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "GFX Busy : %u\n", in->ev_info.gfx_busy);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Connected Display Count : %u\n", in->ev_info.monitor_count);
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "LID State : %s\n", in->ev_info.lid_state ? "Close" : "Open");
> +	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "==== TA inputs END ====\n");
> +}
> +#else
> +void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in) {}
> +#endif
> +
>  static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>  {
>  	u16 max, avg = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
> index a70e67749be3..13e36b52dfe8 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static const char *slider_as_str(unsigned int state)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static const char *source_as_str(unsigned int state)
> +const char *source_as_str(unsigned int state)
>  {
>  	switch (state) {
>  	case POWER_SOURCE_AC:
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> index 961011530c1b..b0711b2f8c8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ta_sm->pmf_result == TA_PMF_TYPE_SUCCESS && out->actions_count) {
> +		amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(dev, in);
>  		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "action count:%u result:%x\n", out->actions_count,
>  			ta_sm->pmf_result);
>  		amd_pmf_apply_policies(dev, out);
> 

[PATCH v2 10/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add capability to sideload of policy binary

[Shyam Sundar S K]

A policy binary is OS agnostic, and the same policies are expected to work
across the OSes.  At times it becomes difficult to debug when the policies
inside the policy binaries starts to misbehave. Add a way to sideload such
policies independently to debug them via a debugfs entry.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309251031.awDDkRgS-lkp@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 2ad5ece47601..b862cd4f902e 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
 	bool cnqf_supported;
 	struct notifier_block pwr_src_notifier;
 	/* Smart PC solution builder */
+	struct dentry *esbin;
 	unsigned char *policy_buf;
 	u32 policy_sz;
 	struct tee_context *tee_ctx;
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index b0711b2f8c8f..01f974b55a6a 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <linux/tee_drv.h>
 #include <linux/uuid.h>
 #include "pmf.h"
@@ -16,9 +17,15 @@
 
 /* Policy binary actions sampling frequency (in ms) */
 static int pb_actions_ms = 1000;
+/* Sideload policy binaries to debug policy failures */
+static bool pb_side_load;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
 module_param(pb_actions_ms, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_actions_ms, "Policy binary actions sampling frequency (default = 1000ms)");
+
+module_param(pb_side_load, bool, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(pb_side_load, "Sideload policy binaries debug policy failures");
 #endif
 
 static const uuid_t amd_pmf_ta_uuid = UUID_INIT(0x6fd93b77, 0x3fb8, 0x524d,
@@ -268,6 +275,61 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
+static ssize_t amd_pmf_get_pb_data(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
+				   size_t length, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = filp->private_data;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* policy binary size cannot exceed POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ */
+	if (length > POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ || length == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dev->policy_sz = length;
+	if (copy_from_user(dev->policy_buf, buf, dev->policy_sz))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	ret = amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return length;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations pb_fops = {
+	.write = amd_pmf_get_pb_data,
+	.open = simple_open,
+};
+
+static int amd_pmf_open_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct dentry *debugfs_root)
+{
+	struct dentry *file = NULL;
+
+	dev->esbin = debugfs_create_dir("pb", debugfs_root);
+	if (IS_ERR(dev->esbin))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	file = debugfs_create_file("update_policy", 0644, dev->esbin, dev, &pb_fops);
+	if (!file)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void amd_pmf_remove_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
+{
+	debugfs_remove_recursive(dev->esbin);
+}
+#else
+static int amd_pmf_open_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct dentry *debugfs_root)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void amd_pmf_remove_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) {}
+#endif
+
 static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
 	dev->policy_buf = kzalloc(dev->policy_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -280,6 +342,9 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 
 	memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz);
 
+	if (pb_side_load)
+		amd_pmf_open_pb(dev, dev->dbgfs_dir);
+
 	return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
 }
 
@@ -388,6 +453,9 @@ int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 
 void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 {
+	if (pb_side_load)
+		amd_pmf_remove_pb(dev);
+
 	kfree(dev->prev_data);
 	kfree(dev->policy_buf);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 11/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: dump policy binary data

[Shyam Sundar S K]

Sometimes policy binary retrieved from the BIOS maybe incorrect that can
end up in failing to enable the Smart PC solution feature.

Use print_hex_dump_debug() to dump the policy binary in hex, so that we
debug the issues related to the binary even before sending that to TA.

Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 01f974b55a6a..d16bdecfd43a 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ static ssize_t amd_pmf_get_pb_data(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
 	if (copy_from_user(dev->policy_buf, buf, dev->policy_sz))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	print_hex_dump_debug("(pb):  ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, dev->policy_buf,
+			     dev->policy_sz, false);
+
 	ret = amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -341,6 +344,10 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz);
+#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
+	print_hex_dump_debug("(pb):  ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, dev->policy_buf,
+			     dev->policy_sz, false);
+#endif
 
 	if (pb_side_load)
 		amd_pmf_open_pb(dev, dev->dbgfs_dir);
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: dump policy binary data

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> Sometimes policy binary retrieved from the BIOS maybe incorrect that can
> end up in failing to enable the Smart PC solution feature.
> 
> Use print_hex_dump_debug() to dump the policy binary in hex, so that we
> debug the issues related to the binary even before sending that to TA.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> index 01f974b55a6a..d16bdecfd43a 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
> @@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ static ssize_t amd_pmf_get_pb_data(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
>  	if (copy_from_user(dev->policy_buf, buf, dev->policy_sz))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> +	print_hex_dump_debug("(pb):  ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, dev->policy_buf,
> +			     dev->policy_sz, false);
> +
>  	ret = amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -341,6 +344,10 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_PMF_DEBUG
> +	print_hex_dump_debug("(pb):  ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, dev->policy_buf,
> +			     dev->policy_sz, false);
> +#endif

Create a wrapper for print_hex_dump_debug into #ifdef and #else blocks for 
this too so you don't need the ifdef here.

-- 
 i.

[PATCH v2 12/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDGPU get interface

[Shyam Sundar S K]

In order to provide GPU inputs to TA for the Smart PC solution to work, we
need to have interface between the PMF driver and the AMDGPU driver.

Add the initial code path for get interface from AMDGPU.

Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile     |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h     |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig    |   1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c     |   1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h      |   3 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c      |  13 +++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c   |  28 +++++
 include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h              |  35 ++++++
 9 files changed, 220 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile
index 384b798a9bad..7fafccefbd7a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Makefile
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ amdgpu-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += amdgpu_fdinfo.o
 
 amdgpu-$(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) += amdgpu_pmu.o
 
+amdgpu-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amdgpu_pmf.o
+
 # add asic specific block
 amdgpu-$(CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU_CIK)+= cik.o cik_ih.o \
 	dce_v8_0.o gfx_v7_0.o cik_sdma.o uvd_v4_2.o vce_v2_0.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
index dc2d53081e80..475f3e248f35 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
 #include <linux/hashtable.h>
 #include <linux/dma-fence.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/amd-pmf-io.h>
 
 #include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h>
 #include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..45a079c028d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2023 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
+ * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
+ * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
+ * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
+ * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
+ * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+ * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL
+ * THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S) OR AUTHOR(S) BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
+ * OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
+ * ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
+ * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
+
+ * * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/backlight.h>
+#include "amdgpu.h"
+
+int amd_pmf_get_gfx_data(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf)
+{
+	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pmf->gpu_dev);
+	struct drm_mode_config *mode_config = &drm_dev->mode_config;
+	struct amdgpu_device *adev = drm_to_adev(drm_dev);
+	struct drm_connector_list_iter iter;
+	struct drm_connector *connector;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	/* reset the count to zero */
+	pmf->display_count = 0;
+	if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU)) {
+		DRM_ERROR("PMF-AMDGPU interface not supported\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	mutex_lock(&mode_config->mutex);
+	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(drm_dev, &iter);
+	drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &iter) {
+		if (connector->status == connector_status_connected) {
+			pmf->con_status[i] = connector->status;
+			pmf->connector_type[i] = connector->connector_type;
+			pmf->display_count++;
+		}
+		i++;
+
+		if (i > MAX_SUPPORTED)
+			break;
+	}
+	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&iter);
+	mutex_unlock(&mode_config->mutex);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_pmf_get_gfx_data);
+
+static int amd_pmf_gpu_get_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev,
+				     unsigned long *state)
+{
+	struct backlight_device *bd;
+
+	if (!acpi_video_backlight_use_native())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	bd = backlight_device_get_by_type(BACKLIGHT_RAW);
+	if (!bd)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	*state = backlight_get_brightness(bd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int amd_pmf_gpu_get_max_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev,
+				     unsigned long *state)
+{
+	struct backlight_device *bd;
+
+	if (!acpi_video_backlight_use_native())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	bd = backlight_device_get_by_type(BACKLIGHT_RAW);
+	if (!bd)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (backlight_is_blank(bd))
+		*state = 0;
+	else
+		*state = bd->props.max_brightness;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops bd_cooling_ops = {
+	.get_max_state = amd_pmf_gpu_get_max_state,
+	.get_cur_state = amd_pmf_gpu_get_cur_state,
+};
+
+int amd_pmf_gpu_init(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf)
+{
+	struct drm_device *drm_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pmf->gpu_dev);
+	struct amdgpu_device *adev = drm_to_adev(drm_dev);
+
+	if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU)) {
+		DRM_ERROR("PMF-AMDGPU interface not supported\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	if (!acpi_video_backlight_use_native())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	pmf->raw_bd = backlight_device_get_by_type(BACKLIGHT_RAW);
+	if (!pmf->raw_bd)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	pmf->cooling_dev = thermal_cooling_device_register("pmf_gpu_bd",
+							   pmf, &bd_cooling_ops);
+	if (IS_ERR(pmf->cooling_dev))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_pmf_gpu_init);
+
+void amd_pmf_gpu_deinit(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf)
+{
+	thermal_cooling_device_unregister(pmf->cooling_dev);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_pmf_gpu_deinit);
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
index 437b78c6d1c5..0cd08f9ab51b 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config AMD_PMF
 	depends on AMD_NB
 	select ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE
 	depends on AMDTEE
+	depends on DRM_AMDGPU
 	help
 	  This driver provides support for the AMD Platform Management Framework.
 	  The goal is to enhance end user experience by making AMD PCs smarter,
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
index 39671d245e96..78bf50ad7e12 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	dev->cpu_id = rdev->device;
+	dev->root = rdev;
 
 	err = amd_smn_read(0, AMD_PMF_BASE_ADDR_LO, &val);
 	if (err) {
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index b862cd4f902e..97cadd080742 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/platform_profile.h>
+#include <linux/amd-pmf-io.h>
 
 #define POLICY_BUF_MAX_SZ		0x4b000
 #define POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE		0x31535024
@@ -227,9 +228,11 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
 	void *shbuf;
 	struct delayed_work pb_work;
 	struct pmf_action_table *prev_data;
+	struct amd_gpu_pmf_data gfx_data;
 	u64 policy_addr;
 	void *policy_base;
 	bool smart_pc_enabled;
+	struct pci_dev *root;
 };
 
 struct apmf_sps_prop_granular {
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
index 3aee78629cce..40872afb99e5 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Max C0 Residency : %u\n", in->ev_info.max_c0residency);
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "GFX Busy : %u\n", in->ev_info.gfx_busy);
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Connected Display Count : %u\n", in->ev_info.monitor_count);
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Primary Display Type : %s\n",
+		drm_get_connector_type_name(in->ev_info.display_type));
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Primary Display State : %s\n", in->ev_info.display_state ?
+			"Connected" : "disconnected/unknown");
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "LID State : %s\n", in->ev_info.lid_state ? "Close" : "Open");
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "==== TA inputs END ====\n");
 }
@@ -145,6 +149,14 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_slider_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void amd_pmf_get_gpu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	amd_pmf_get_gfx_data(&dev->gfx_data);
+	in->ev_info.monitor_count = dev->gfx_data.display_count;
+	in->ev_info.display_type = dev->gfx_data.connector_type[0];
+	in->ev_info.display_state = dev->gfx_data.con_status[0];
+}
+
 void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
 {
 	/* TA side lid open is 1 and close is 0, hence the ! here */
@@ -153,4 +165,5 @@ void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_tab
 	amd_pmf_get_smu_info(dev, in);
 	amd_pmf_get_battery_info(dev, in);
 	amd_pmf_get_slider_info(dev, in);
+	amd_pmf_get_gpu_info(dev, in);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index d16bdecfd43a..9216c2065fd3 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/tee_drv.h>
 #include <linux/uuid.h>
 #include "pmf.h"
@@ -355,6 +356,21 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
 }
 
+static int amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
+{
+	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = data;
+
+	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI && pdev->devfn == 0) {
+		/* get the amdgpu handle from the pci root after walking through the pci bus */
+		dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev = pci_get_device(pdev->vendor, pdev->device, NULL);
+		if (dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev) {
+			pci_dev_put(pdev);
+			return 1; /* stop walking */
+		}
+	}
+	return 0; /* continue walking */
+}
+
 static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
 {
 	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
@@ -451,6 +467,15 @@ int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd);
 	amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
 	amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(dev);
+
+	/* get amdgpu handle */
+	pci_walk_bus(dev->root->bus, amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle, dev);
+	if (!dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev)
+		dev_err(dev->dev, "GPU handle not found!\n");
+
+	if (!amd_pmf_gpu_init(&dev->gfx_data))
+		dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev_en = true;
+
 	dev->prev_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->prev_data), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!dev->prev_data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -466,5 +491,8 @@ void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 	kfree(dev->prev_data);
 	kfree(dev->policy_buf);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work);
+	if (dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev_en)
+		amd_pmf_gpu_deinit(&dev->gfx_data);
+	pci_dev_put(dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev);
 	amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h b/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5f79e66a41b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * AMD Platform Management Framework Interface
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
+ * All Rights Reserved.
+ *
+ * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef AMD_PMF_IO_H
+#define AMD_PMF_IO_H
+
+#include <acpi/video.h>
+#include <drm/drm_connector.h>
+#include <linux/backlight.h>
+#include <linux/thermal.h>
+
+#define MAX_SUPPORTED 4
+
+/* amdgpu */
+struct amd_gpu_pmf_data {
+	struct pci_dev *gpu_dev;
+	struct backlight_device *raw_bd;
+	struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev;
+	enum drm_connector_status con_status[MAX_SUPPORTED];
+	int display_count;
+	int connector_type[MAX_SUPPORTED];
+	bool gpu_dev_en;
+};
+
+int amd_pmf_get_gfx_data(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf);
+int amd_pmf_gpu_init(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf);
+void amd_pmf_gpu_deinit(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf);
+#endif
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDGPU get interface

[Ilpo Järvinen]

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:

> In order to provide GPU inputs to TA for the Smart PC solution to work, we
> need to have interface between the PMF driver and the AMDGPU driver.
> 
> Add the initial code path for get interface from AMDGPU.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>

> @@ -355,6 +356,21 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  	return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
>  }
>  
> +static int amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = data;
> +
> +	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI && pdev->devfn == 0) {
> +		/* get the amdgpu handle from the pci root after walking through the pci bus */

I can see from the code that you assign to amdgpu handle so this comment 
added no information.

It doesn't really answer at all why you're doing this second step. Based 
on the give parameters to pci_get_device(), it looks as if you're asking 
for the same device you already have in pdev to be searched to you.

> +		dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev = pci_get_device(pdev->vendor, pdev->device, NULL);
> +		if (dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev) {
> +			pci_dev_put(pdev);
> +			return 1; /* stop walking */
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return 0; /* continue walking */
> +}
> +
>  static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
>  {
>  	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
> @@ -451,6 +467,15 @@ int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd);
>  	amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
>  	amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(dev);
> +
> +	/* get amdgpu handle */
> +	pci_walk_bus(dev->root->bus, amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle, dev);
> +	if (!dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev)
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "GPU handle not found!\n");
> +
> +	if (!amd_pmf_gpu_init(&dev->gfx_data))
> +		dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev_en = true;
> +


-- 
 i.

Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDGPU get interface

[Shyam Sundar S K]

On 10/4/2023 6:19 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> 
>> In order to provide GPU inputs to TA for the Smart PC solution to work, we
>> need to have interface between the PMF driver and the AMDGPU driver.
>>
>> Add the initial code path for get interface from AMDGPU.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> 
>> @@ -355,6 +356,21 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  	return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = data;
>> +
>> +	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI && pdev->devfn == 0) {
>> +		/* get the amdgpu handle from the pci root after walking through the pci bus */
> 
> I can see from the code that you assign to amdgpu handle so this comment 
> added no information.
> 
> It doesn't really answer at all why you're doing this second step. Based 
> on the give parameters to pci_get_device(), it looks as if you're asking 
> for the same device you already have in pdev to be searched to you.

Not sure if I understand you remark completely.

amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle() is a callback function for pci_walk_bus
(which is done below).

What I am trying to do here is to get the PCI handle for the GPU
device by walking the PCI bus.

I think the 'pdev' here refers to the pci root, using that root we
walk the entire tree and only stop walking when we find a handle to
GPU device.

Do you want me to change the "pdev" parameter to be renamed as "root" ?

Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Shyam

> 
>> +		dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev = pci_get_device(pdev->vendor, pdev->device, NULL);
>> +		if (dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev) {
>> +			pci_dev_put(pdev);
>> +			return 1; /* stop walking */
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +	return 0; /* continue walking */
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data)
>>  {
>>  	return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE;
>> @@ -451,6 +467,15 @@ int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd);
>>  	amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev);
>>  	amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(dev);
>> +
>> +	/* get amdgpu handle */
>> +	pci_walk_bus(dev->root->bus, amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle, dev);
>> +	if (!dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev)
>> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "GPU handle not found!\n");
>> +
>> +	if (!amd_pmf_gpu_init(&dev->gfx_data))
>> +		dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev_en = true;
>> +
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 12/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDGPU get interface

[Ilpo Järvinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2615 bytes --]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> On 10/4/2023 6:19 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> > 
> >> In order to provide GPU inputs to TA for the Smart PC solution to work, we
> >> need to have interface between the PMF driver and the AMDGPU driver.
> >>
> >> Add the initial code path for get interface from AMDGPU.
> >>
> >> Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> > 
> >> @@ -355,6 +356,21 @@ static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
> >>  	return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +static int amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct amd_pmf_dev *dev = data;
> >> +
> >> +	if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI && pdev->devfn == 0) {
> >> +		/* get the amdgpu handle from the pci root after walking through the pci bus */
> > 
> > I can see from the code that you assign to amdgpu handle so this comment 
> > added no information.
> > 
> > It doesn't really answer at all why you're doing this second step. Based 
> > on the give parameters to pci_get_device(), it looks as if you're asking 
> > for the same device you already have in pdev to be searched to you.
> 
> Not sure if I understand you remark completely.
> 
> amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle() is a callback function for pci_walk_bus
> (which is done below).
> 
> What I am trying to do here is to get the PCI handle for the GPU
> device by walking the PCI bus.
> 
> I think the 'pdev' here refers to the pci root, using that root we
> walk the entire tree and only stop walking when we find a handle to
> GPU device.

Not exactly what happens, in amd_pmf_get_gpu_handle() pdev changes on each 
call so I don't know why you stated it is refering to the "pci root".

> Do you want me to change the "pdev" parameter to be renamed as "root" ?

No, please don't do that, it would be misleading.

> Am I missing something?

I meant that at some point of the walk through the PCI devices, you have 
a PCI device pdev with ->vendor PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD when that if condition 
above matched. Please explain why you need to do another lookup with 
pci_get_device() at that point (with the same ->vendor and ->device as 
shown below)?

> >> +		dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev = pci_get_device(pdev->vendor, pdev->device, NULL);
> >> +		if (dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev) {
> >> +			pci_dev_put(pdev);
> >> +			return 1; /* stop walking */
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +	return 0; /* continue walking */


-- 
 i.

[PATCH v2 13/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDGPU set interface

[Shyam Sundar S K]

For the Smart PC Solution to fully work, it has to enact to the actions
coming from TA. Add the initial code path for set interface to AMDGPU.

Change amd_pmf_apply_policies() return type, so that it can return
errors when the call to retrieve information from amdgpu fails.

Co-developed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h      |  2 ++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c   | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c
index 45a079c028d3..803e6bb66914 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pmf.c
@@ -61,6 +61,23 @@ int amd_pmf_get_gfx_data(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_pmf_get_gfx_data);
 
+static int amd_pmf_gpu_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev,
+				     unsigned long state)
+{
+	struct backlight_device *bd;
+
+	if (!acpi_video_backlight_use_native())
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	bd = backlight_device_get_by_type(BACKLIGHT_RAW);
+	if (!bd)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	backlight_device_set_brightness(bd, state);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int amd_pmf_gpu_get_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev,
 				     unsigned long *state)
 {
@@ -101,6 +118,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_gpu_get_max_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling_dev,
 static const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops bd_cooling_ops = {
 	.get_max_state = amd_pmf_gpu_get_max_state,
 	.get_cur_state = amd_pmf_gpu_get_cur_state,
+	.set_cur_state = amd_pmf_gpu_set_cur_state,
 };
 
 int amd_pmf_gpu_init(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
index 97cadd080742..59329308ed8e 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_APU				7
 #define PMF_POLICY_STT_SKINTEMP_HS2				8
 #define PMF_POLICY_SYSTEM_STATE					9
+#define PMF_POLICY_DISPLAY_BRIGHTNESS				12
 #define PMF_POLICY_P3T						38
 
 /* TA macros */
@@ -482,6 +483,7 @@ enum ta_pmf_error_type {
 };
 
 struct pmf_action_table {
+	unsigned long display_brightness;
 	enum system_state system_state;
 	unsigned long spl; /* in mW */
 	unsigned long sppt; /* in mW */
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
index 9216c2065fd3..d20821c914c7 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
@@ -78,9 +78,11 @@ static int amd_pmf_update_uevents(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u16 event)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
+static int amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out)
 {
+	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev = dev->gfx_data.cooling_dev;
 	unsigned long val, event = 0;
+	unsigned long state;
 	int idx;
 
 	for (idx = 0; idx < out->actions_count; idx++) {
@@ -160,8 +162,21 @@ static void amd_pmf_apply_policies(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_
 				dev->prev_data->system_state = 0;
 			}
 			break;
+
+		case PMF_POLICY_DISPLAY_BRIGHTNESS:
+			if (!dev->gfx_data.gpu_dev_en)
+				return -ENODEV;
+
+			cdev->ops->get_cur_state(cdev, &state);
+			if (state != val) {
+				cdev->ops->set_cur_state(cdev, val);
+				dev_dbg(dev->dev, "update DISPLAY_BRIGHTNESS : %lu\n", val);
+			}
+			break;
 		}
 	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
@@ -198,7 +213,9 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
 		amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(dev, in);
 		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "action count:%u result:%x\n", out->actions_count,
 			ta_sm->pmf_result);
-		amd_pmf_apply_policies(dev, out);
+		ret = amd_pmf_apply_policies(dev, out);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 14/16] HID: amd_sfh: rename float_to_int() to amd_sfh_float_to_int()

[Shyam Sundar S K]

From: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>

Current amd_sfh driver has float_to_int() to convert units from
float to int. This is fine until this function gets called outside of
the current scope of file.

Add a prefix "amd_sfh" to float_to_int() so that function represents
the driver name. This function will be called by multiple callers in the
next patch.

Co-developed-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
---
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c | 22 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c
index 06bdcf072d10..47a87b28e00e 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static void get_common_inputs(struct common_input_property *common, int report_i
 	common->event_type = HID_USAGE_SENSOR_EVENT_DATA_UPDATED_ENUM;
 }
 
-static int float_to_int(u32 flt32_val)
+static int amd_sfh_float_to_int(u32 flt32_val)
 {
 	int fraction, shift, mantissa, sign, exp, zeropre;
 
@@ -200,9 +200,9 @@ static u8 get_input_rep(u8 current_index, int sensor_idx, int report_id,
 			     OFFSET_SENSOR_DATA_DEFAULT;
 		memcpy_fromio(&accel_data, sensoraddr, sizeof(struct sfh_accel_data));
 		get_common_inputs(&acc_input.common_property, report_id);
-		acc_input.in_accel_x_value = float_to_int(accel_data.acceldata.x) / 100;
-		acc_input.in_accel_y_value = float_to_int(accel_data.acceldata.y) / 100;
-		acc_input.in_accel_z_value = float_to_int(accel_data.acceldata.z) / 100;
+		acc_input.in_accel_x_value = amd_sfh_float_to_int(accel_data.acceldata.x) / 100;
+		acc_input.in_accel_y_value = amd_sfh_float_to_int(accel_data.acceldata.y) / 100;
+		acc_input.in_accel_z_value = amd_sfh_float_to_int(accel_data.acceldata.z) / 100;
 		memcpy(input_report, &acc_input, sizeof(acc_input));
 		report_size = sizeof(acc_input);
 		break;
@@ -211,9 +211,9 @@ static u8 get_input_rep(u8 current_index, int sensor_idx, int report_id,
 			     OFFSET_SENSOR_DATA_DEFAULT;
 		memcpy_fromio(&gyro_data, sensoraddr, sizeof(struct sfh_gyro_data));
 		get_common_inputs(&gyro_input.common_property, report_id);
-		gyro_input.in_angel_x_value = float_to_int(gyro_data.gyrodata.x) / 1000;
-		gyro_input.in_angel_y_value = float_to_int(gyro_data.gyrodata.y) / 1000;
-		gyro_input.in_angel_z_value = float_to_int(gyro_data.gyrodata.z) / 1000;
+		gyro_input.in_angel_x_value = amd_sfh_float_to_int(gyro_data.gyrodata.x) / 1000;
+		gyro_input.in_angel_y_value = amd_sfh_float_to_int(gyro_data.gyrodata.y) / 1000;
+		gyro_input.in_angel_z_value = amd_sfh_float_to_int(gyro_data.gyrodata.z) / 1000;
 		memcpy(input_report, &gyro_input, sizeof(gyro_input));
 		report_size = sizeof(gyro_input);
 		break;
@@ -222,9 +222,9 @@ static u8 get_input_rep(u8 current_index, int sensor_idx, int report_id,
 			     OFFSET_SENSOR_DATA_DEFAULT;
 		memcpy_fromio(&mag_data, sensoraddr, sizeof(struct sfh_mag_data));
 		get_common_inputs(&magno_input.common_property, report_id);
-		magno_input.in_magno_x = float_to_int(mag_data.magdata.x) / 100;
-		magno_input.in_magno_y = float_to_int(mag_data.magdata.y) / 100;
-		magno_input.in_magno_z = float_to_int(mag_data.magdata.z) / 100;
+		magno_input.in_magno_x = amd_sfh_float_to_int(mag_data.magdata.x) / 100;
+		magno_input.in_magno_y = amd_sfh_float_to_int(mag_data.magdata.y) / 100;
+		magno_input.in_magno_z = amd_sfh_float_to_int(mag_data.magdata.z) / 100;
 		magno_input.in_magno_accuracy = mag_data.accuracy / 100;
 		memcpy(input_report, &magno_input, sizeof(magno_input));
 		report_size = sizeof(magno_input);
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static u8 get_input_rep(u8 current_index, int sensor_idx, int report_id,
 			     OFFSET_SENSOR_DATA_DEFAULT;
 		memcpy_fromio(&als_data, sensoraddr, sizeof(struct sfh_als_data));
 		get_common_inputs(&als_input.common_property, report_id);
-		als_input.illuminance_value = float_to_int(als_data.lux);
+		als_input.illuminance_value = amd_sfh_float_to_int(als_data.lux);
 		report_size = sizeof(als_input);
 		memcpy(input_report, &als_input, sizeof(als_input));
 		break;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 15/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDSFH interface for HPD

[Shyam Sundar S K]

From: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>

AMDSFH has information about the User presence information via the Human
Presence Detection (HPD) sensor which is part of the AMD sensor fusion hub.
Add PMF and AMDSFH interface to get this information.

Co-developed-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
---
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h      |  5 ++++
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c | 11 ++++++++
 .../amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c    | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig          |  1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c            | 21 ++++++++++++++
 include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h                    | 20 ++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h
index 2643bb14fee2..cd57037bf217 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ struct amd_mp2_sensor_info {
 	dma_addr_t dma_address;
 };
 
+struct sfh_dev_status {
+	bool is_hpd_present;
+};
+
 struct amd_mp2_dev {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
 	struct amdtp_cl_data *cl_data;
@@ -47,6 +51,7 @@ struct amd_mp2_dev {
 	struct amd_input_data in_data;
 	/* mp2 active control status */
 	u32 mp2_acs;
+	struct sfh_dev_status dev_en;
 };
 
 struct amd_mp2_ops {
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c
index e9c6413af24a..3dc652d41d7d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c
@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ static int amd_sfh_hid_client_deinit(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata)
 	int i, status;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cl_data->num_hid_devices; i++) {
+		switch (cl_data->sensor_idx[i]) {
+		case HPD_IDX:
+			privdata->dev_en.is_hpd_present = false;
+			break;
+		}
+
 		if (cl_data->sensor_sts[i] == SENSOR_ENABLED) {
 			privdata->mp2_ops->stop(privdata, cl_data->sensor_idx[i]);
 			status = amd_sfh_wait_for_response
@@ -178,6 +184,11 @@ static int amd_sfh1_1_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata)
 			rc = amdtp_hid_probe(i, cl_data);
 			if (rc)
 				goto cleanup;
+			switch (cl_data->sensor_idx[i]) {
+			case HPD_IDX:
+				privdata->dev_en.is_hpd_present = true;
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 		dev_dbg(dev, "sid 0x%x (%s) status 0x%x\n",
 			cl_data->sensor_idx[i], get_sensor_name(cl_data->sensor_idx[i]),
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c
index 4f81ef2d4f56..7637da0dec6f 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c
@@ -7,11 +7,14 @@
  *
  * Author: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
  */
+#include <linux/amd-pmf-io.h>
 #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 
 #include "amd_sfh_interface.h"
 
+static struct amd_mp2_dev *emp2;
+
 static int amd_sfh_wait_response(struct amd_mp2_dev *mp2, u8 sid, u32 cmd_id)
 {
 	struct sfh_cmd_response cmd_resp;
@@ -76,4 +79,29 @@ static struct amd_mp2_ops amd_sfh_ops = {
 void sfh_interface_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *mp2)
 {
 	mp2->mp2_ops = &amd_sfh_ops;
+	emp2 = mp2;
+}
+
+static int amd_sfh_hpd_info(u8 *user_present)
+{
+	if (emp2 && emp2->dev_en.is_hpd_present) {
+		struct hpd_status hpdstatus;
+
+		hpdstatus.val = readl(emp2->mmio + AMD_C2P_MSG(4));
+		*user_present = hpdstatus.shpd.presence;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+int amd_get_sfh_info(struct amd_sfh_info *sfh_info, enum sfh_message_type op)
+{
+	if (sfh_info) {
+		switch (op) {
+		case MT_HPD:
+			return amd_sfh_hpd_info(&sfh_info->user_present);
+		}
+	}
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_get_sfh_info);
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
index 0cd08f9ab51b..ca4f7d5a11b2 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Kconfig
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ config AMD_PMF
 	select ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE
 	depends on AMDTEE
 	depends on DRM_AMDGPU
+	depends on AMD_SFH_HID
 	help
 	  This driver provides support for the AMD Platform Management Framework.
 	  The goal is to enhance end user experience by making AMD PCs smarter,
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
index 40872afb99e5..4fd1953167ed 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Primary Display State : %s\n", in->ev_info.display_state ?
 			"Connected" : "disconnected/unknown");
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "LID State : %s\n", in->ev_info.lid_state ? "Close" : "Open");
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "User Presence : %s\n", in->ev_info.user_present ? "Present" : "Away");
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "==== TA inputs END ====\n");
 }
 #else
@@ -157,6 +158,25 @@ static void amd_pmf_get_gpu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_ta
 	in->ev_info.display_state = dev->gfx_data.con_status[0];
 }
 
+static void amd_pmf_get_sensor_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
+{
+	struct amd_sfh_info sfh_info;
+
+	/* get HPD data */
+	amd_get_sfh_info(&sfh_info, MT_HPD);
+	switch (sfh_info.user_present) {
+	case SFH_NOT_DETECTED:
+		in->ev_info.user_present = 0xff; /* assume no sensors connected */
+		break;
+	case SFH_USER_PRESENT:
+		in->ev_info.user_present = 1;
+		break;
+	case SFH_USER_AWAY:
+		in->ev_info.user_present = 0;
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
 void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
 {
 	/* TA side lid open is 1 and close is 0, hence the ! here */
@@ -166,4 +186,5 @@ void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_tab
 	amd_pmf_get_battery_info(dev, in);
 	amd_pmf_get_slider_info(dev, in);
 	amd_pmf_get_gpu_info(dev, in);
+	amd_pmf_get_sensor_info(dev, in);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h b/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
index 5f79e66a41b3..43e5a88d2cad 100644
--- a/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
+++ b/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
  * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  * All Rights Reserved.
  *
- * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
+ * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
+ *          Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
  */
 
 #ifndef AMD_PMF_IO_H
@@ -32,4 +33,21 @@ struct amd_gpu_pmf_data {
 int amd_pmf_get_gfx_data(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf);
 int amd_pmf_gpu_init(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf);
 void amd_pmf_gpu_deinit(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf);
+
+/* amd-sfh */
+enum sfh_message_type {
+	MT_HPD,
+};
+
+enum hpd_info {
+	SFH_NOT_DETECTED,
+	SFH_USER_PRESENT,
+	SFH_USER_AWAY
+};
+
+struct amd_sfh_info {
+	u8 user_present;
+};
+
+int amd_get_sfh_info(struct amd_sfh_info *sfh_info, enum sfh_message_type op);
 #endif
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v2 16/16] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add PMF-AMDSFH interface for ALS

[Shyam Sundar S K]

From: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>

AMDSFH has information about the Ambient light via the Ambient
Light Sensor (ALS) which is part of the AMD sensor fusion hub.
Add PMF and AMDSFH interface to get this information.

make amd_sfh_float_to_int() as non-static function so that this can
be called outside of the current file.

Co-developed-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
---
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h      |  1 +
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c |  2 +-
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c |  6 ++++++
 .../amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c    | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.h    |  1 +
 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c            |  7 +++++++
 include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h                    |  2 ++
 7 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h
index cd57037bf217..a1950bc6e6ce 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_common.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct amd_mp2_sensor_info {
 
 struct sfh_dev_status {
 	bool is_hpd_present;
+	bool is_als_present;
 };
 
 struct amd_mp2_dev {
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c
index 47a87b28e00e..dbc8c6943ca1 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_desc.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static void get_common_inputs(struct common_input_property *common, int report_i
 	common->event_type = HID_USAGE_SENSOR_EVENT_DATA_UPDATED_ENUM;
 }
 
-static int amd_sfh_float_to_int(u32 flt32_val)
+int amd_sfh_float_to_int(u32 flt32_val)
 {
 	int fraction, shift, mantissa, sign, exp, zeropre;
 
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c
index 3dc652d41d7d..f2890d329459 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_init.c
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ static int amd_sfh_hid_client_deinit(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata)
 		case HPD_IDX:
 			privdata->dev_en.is_hpd_present = false;
 			break;
+		case ALS_IDX:
+			privdata->dev_en.is_als_present = false;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		if (cl_data->sensor_sts[i] == SENSOR_ENABLED) {
@@ -188,6 +191,9 @@ static int amd_sfh1_1_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata)
 			case HPD_IDX:
 				privdata->dev_en.is_hpd_present = true;
 				break;
+			case ALS_IDX:
+				privdata->dev_en.is_als_present = true;
+				break;
 			}
 		}
 		dev_dbg(dev, "sid 0x%x (%s) status 0x%x\n",
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c
index 7637da0dec6f..48a7a450e029 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.c
@@ -94,12 +94,32 @@ static int amd_sfh_hpd_info(u8 *user_present)
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
+static int amd_sfh_als_info(u32 *ambient_light)
+{
+	if (emp2 && emp2->dev_en.is_als_present) {
+		struct sfh_als_data als_data;
+		void __iomem *sensoraddr;
+
+		sensoraddr = emp2->vsbase +
+			(ALS_IDX * SENSOR_DATA_MEM_SIZE_DEFAULT) +
+			OFFSET_SENSOR_DATA_DEFAULT;
+		memcpy_fromio(&als_data, sensoraddr, sizeof(struct sfh_als_data));
+		*ambient_light = amd_sfh_float_to_int(als_data.lux);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+
 int amd_get_sfh_info(struct amd_sfh_info *sfh_info, enum sfh_message_type op)
 {
 	if (sfh_info) {
 		switch (op) {
 		case MT_HPD:
 			return amd_sfh_hpd_info(&sfh_info->user_present);
+		case MT_ALS:
+			return amd_sfh_als_info(&sfh_info->ambient_light);
 		}
 	}
 	return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.h b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.h
index 9d31d5b510eb..7ecddad430e4 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.h
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/sfh1_1/amd_sfh_interface.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ struct hpd_status {
 	};
 };
 
+int amd_sfh_float_to_int(u32 flt32_val);
 void sfh_interface_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *mp2);
 void amd_sfh1_1_set_desc_ops(struct amd_mp2_ops *mp2_ops);
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
index 4fd1953167ed..10c35291e7ae 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ void amd_pmf_dump_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *
 			"Connected" : "disconnected/unknown");
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "LID State : %s\n", in->ev_info.lid_state ? "Close" : "Open");
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "User Presence : %s\n", in->ev_info.user_present ? "Present" : "Away");
+	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Ambient Light : %d\n", in->ev_info.ambient_light);
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "==== TA inputs END ====\n");
 }
 #else
@@ -161,6 +162,12 @@ static void amd_pmf_get_gpu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_ta
 static void amd_pmf_get_sensor_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
 {
 	struct amd_sfh_info sfh_info;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* get ALS data */
+	ret = amd_get_sfh_info(&sfh_info, MT_ALS);
+	if (!ret)
+		in->ev_info.ambient_light = sfh_info.ambient_light;
 
 	/* get HPD data */
 	amd_get_sfh_info(&sfh_info, MT_HPD);
diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h b/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
index 43e5a88d2cad..a2990c0d72f6 100644
--- a/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
+++ b/include/linux/amd-pmf-io.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ void amd_pmf_gpu_deinit(struct amd_gpu_pmf_data *pmf);
 /* amd-sfh */
 enum sfh_message_type {
 	MT_HPD,
+	MT_ALS,
 };
 
 enum hpd_info {
@@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ enum hpd_info {
 };
 
 struct amd_sfh_info {
+	u32 ambient_light;
 	u8 user_present;
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1