From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: add sensable phantom driver Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:56:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <2460126662758025813@fi.muni.cz> <45EEEAA3.50009@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45EEEAA3.50009@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: To: Jiri Slaby Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Greg KH List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On 3/7/07, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov napsal(a): > > Hi Jiri, > > Hi. > > > On 3/7/07, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> add sensable phantom driver > > ... > > > > General question - can this driver use force-feedback mecahnisms > > already present in kernel instead of exporting raw datastream to > > userspace. What are shortcomings of kernels force-feedback > > implemenattion that make it insufficient for phantom? > > I didn't even think about it, sorry. Does any problem with rate about 2kHz come > on your mind before I'll try to rewrite it? No, not really. -- Dmitry