From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: Fix locking in mousedev
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:28:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d120d5000703090628p46556d52qb94b523fda4e947d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070228110631.86a150e4.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Hi Pete,
On 2/28/07, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> wrote:
> If a process is closing /dev/input/mice and an mouse disconnects simulta-
> neously, the system is likely to oops. This usually happens when someone
> hits <Alt><Ctrl>F1 or logs out from X, and flips a KVM while the system
> is reacting.
>
> I reproduced the issue by running this:
> while true; do cat </dev/null >/dev/input/mice; done
> This way, it oopses on 2nd or 3rd disconnect reliably. With the patch,
> I can disconnect the mouse 20 times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> Discussion
>
> One of the race scenarios is related to the list of handles. The cat
> calls mousedev_close -> mixdev_release, does list_for_each to walk for
> all handles for a given handler. Iterations are longish while it does
> input_close_device -> hidinput_close -> usbhid_close -> usb_kill_urb,
> which sleeps briefly. Into this gap goes khubd and does hid_disconnect ->
> hidinput_disconnect -> input_unregister_device. This corrupts the list
> of handles which cat process is walking.
>
> I was unable to devise a scheme to protect the stock h_list adequately,
> so I implemented a private list of mousedev instances, which can be
> protected correctly.
>
> Dmitry, please consider getting rid of the list of handles entirely.
> The other major user is drivers/char/keyboard.c.
>
I agree that handlers should not access h_list nad use their own
private lists instead. However input core still needs that list to
maintain its books.
> Other than that, the patch is straightforward. It adds a static mutex
> to guard common data structures. It has to be static because instances
> of mousedev share common structures, such as the mousedev_table[].
>
> This should be uncontroversial, but please let me know if I missed
> something obvious.
>
I agree with the patch, unfortunately in lands squarely in the middle
of me restructuring the code (swiitch to struct device, proper
refcounting, etc) but I will try to adopt it.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-28 19:06 Fix locking in mousedev Pete Zaitcev
2007-03-09 14:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2007-03-09 18:36 ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-03-09 20:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d120d5000703090628p46556d52qb94b523fda4e947d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).