From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: generic: Check other drivers match callback from __check_hid_generic
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:48:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d90a5b8f-08fa-b358-900c-b579f64e8782@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO-hwJL_5JKGjoKFyybfpA=89eK4C3nJtZMb5_8oxnzf9EJGaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 1/31/20 2:39 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:46 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> __check_hid_generic is used to check if there is a driver, other then
>> the hid-generic driver, which wants to handle the hid-device, in which
>> case hid_generic_match() will return false so that the other driver can
>> bind.
>>
>> But what if the other driver also has a match callback and that indicates
>> it does not want to handle the device? Then hid-generic should bind to it
>> and thus hid_generic_match() should NOT return false in that case.
>>
>> This commit makes __check_hid_generic check if a matching driver has
>> a match callback and if it does makes its check this, so that
>> hid-generic will bind to devices which have a matching other driver,
>> but that other driver's match callback rejects the device.
>
> I get that part, but I am not sure I'll remember this in 2 months time
> when/if we need to extend the .match() in another driver.
> I am especially worried about the potential circular calls where an
> other driver decides to check on all the other drivers having a match
> callback...
>
> Could you add a little blurb either in hid-generic.c explaining the
> logic, or (and) in hid.h where .match is defined?
>
> Because now, we have 2 callers for .match(): hid-core and hid-generic
> (and 2 is usually one too many :-/).
Ok, how about the following:
static int __check_hid_generic(struct device_driver *drv, void *data)
{
struct hid_driver *hdrv = to_hid_driver(drv);
struct hid_device *hdev = data;
if (hdrv == &hid_generic)
return 0;
if (!hid_match_device(hdev, hdrv))
return 0;
/*
* The purpose of looping over all drivers to see if one is a match
* for the hdev, is for hid-generic to NOT bind to any devices which
* have another, specialized, driver registerd. But in some cases that
* specialized driver might have a match callback itself, e.g. because
* it only wants to bind to a single USB interface of a device with
* multiple HID interfaces.
* So if another driver defines a match callback and that match
* callback returns false then hid-generic should still bind to the
* device and we should thus keep looping over the registered drivers.
*/
if (!hdrv->match)
return 1;
return hdrv->match(hdev, false);
}
?
Let me know if you like this then I'll send a v2 with this.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-31 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-31 12:46 [PATCH] HID: generic: Check other drivers match callback from __check_hid_generic Hans de Goede
2020-01-31 13:39 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2020-01-31 13:48 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-01-31 14:00 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2020-01-31 14:06 ` Hans de Goede
2020-01-31 14:13 ` Benjamin Tissoires
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d90a5b8f-08fa-b358-900c-b579f64e8782@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox