linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, hmh@hmh.eng.br,
	dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, njoshi1@lenovo.com,
	vsankar@lenovo.com, peter.hutterer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Support for trackpoint doubletap
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:04:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1ccf281-5c77-4447-a6c7-5b0b008c7c56@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240324210817.192033-3-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>

Hi Mark,

On 3/24/24 10:07 PM, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Lenovo trackpoints are adding the ability to generate a doubletap event.
> This handles the doubletap event and sends the KEY_DOUBLECLICK event to
> userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Sankar <vsankar@lenovo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 82429e59999d..2bbb32c898e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ enum tpacpi_hkey_event_t {
>  
>  	/* Misc */
>  	TP_HKEY_EV_RFKILL_CHANGED	= 0x7000, /* rfkill switch changed */
> +	TP_HKEY_EV_TRACKPOINT_DOUBLETAP = 0x8036, /* doubletap on Trackpoint*/
>  };
>  
>  /****************************************************************************
> @@ -4081,6 +4082,22 @@ static void hotkey_notify(struct ibm_struct *ibm, u32 event)
>  				break;
>  			}
>  			fallthrough;	/* to default */

This now no longer fallsthrough to default. IMHO the best thing to do
here is add a new preparation patch which initializes known_ev to false
inside the while before the switch-case (together with the send_acpi_ev
and ignore_acpi_ev init). and then change this fallthrough to a break
in the preparation patch. You can then also remove the default case
altogether in this prep patch.

> +		case 8:
> +			/* 0x8036: Trackpoint doubletaps */
> +			if (hkey == TP_HKEY_EV_TRACKPOINT_DOUBLETAP) {
> +				send_acpi_ev = true;
> +				ignore_acpi_ev = false;

These 2 values are set as the default above the switch-case, please
drop these 2 lines.

> +				known_ev = true;
> +				/* Send to user space */
> +				mutex_lock(&tpacpi_inputdev_send_mutex);
> +				input_report_key(tpacpi_inputdev, KEY_DOUBLECLICK, 1);
> +				input_sync(tpacpi_inputdev);
> +				input_report_key(tpacpi_inputdev, KEY_DOUBLECLICK, 0);
> +				input_sync(tpacpi_inputdev);
> +				mutex_unlock(&tpacpi_inputdev_send_mutex);

This code duplicates tpacpi_input_send_key(), what you want to do here
is define a hotkey_keycode_map scancode range for new 0x8xxx codes like how this
was done when extended scancodes where added to deal with the new 0x13xx hotkey
event codes for the 2017+ models.

See commit 696c6523ec8f ("platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: add mapping for new hotkeys")

Despite re-using tpacpi_input_send_key() there are 2 reasons why we want
scancodes for these new "keys".

1. By adding the keys to the hotkey_keycode_map they automatically
also get input_set_capability(tpacpi_inputdev, EV_KEY, hotkey_keycode_map[i]);
called on them advertising to userspace that tpacpi_inputdev can actually
generate these keypresses. Something which is currently lacking from your
patch. Related to this did you test this with evtest? I think that the input
core will suppress the events when you do not set the capability ?

2. This allows remapping scancodes to different KEY_foo values with hwdb
entries.

Regards,

Hans








> +				break;
> +			}
> +			fallthrough;	/* to default */
>  		default:
>  			known_ev = false;
>  		}


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-24 21:07 [PATCH 0/4] platform/x86,input: Support for new events on Mark Pearson
2024-03-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] Input: Add trackpoint doubletap and system debug info keycodes Mark Pearson
2024-04-08 12:45   ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-08 23:31   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-09  0:00     ` Mark Pearson
2024-04-09 10:16       ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-09 21:54         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-09  5:23     ` Peter Hutterer
2024-04-09 21:47       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-10  1:20         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-10  2:17           ` Mark Pearson
2024-04-11  0:02             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-11  2:48               ` Mark Pearson
2024-04-15 19:40                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-15 19:50                   ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-15 19:58                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-15 20:28                       ` Mark Pearson
2024-04-15 22:54                         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-15 23:57                           ` Mark Pearson
2024-04-16  8:33                             ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-16 12:48                               ` Mark Pearson
2024-04-16 13:03                                 ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-16  8:35                       ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-11 12:30               ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-15 19:35                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-15 19:47                   ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-15 19:55                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-04-10  4:32           ` Peter Hutterer
2024-04-15 19:32             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2024-03-24 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Support for trackpoint doubletap Mark Pearson
2024-04-08 13:04   ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2024-04-08 14:56     ` [ibm-acpi-devel] " Mark Pearson
2024-03-24 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Support for system debug info hotkey Mark Pearson
2024-04-08 13:11   ` Hans de Goede
2024-04-08 14:56     ` Mark Pearson
2024-03-24 21:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Support hotkey to disable trackpoint doubletap Mark Pearson
2024-04-08 13:13   ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e1ccf281-5c77-4447-a6c7-5b0b008c7c56@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
    --cc=njoshi1@lenovo.com \
    --cc=peter.hutterer@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vsankar@lenovo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).