Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: buffer: fix timestamp alignment when quaternion in scan

["Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>]

On Sun, 2026-03-01 at 14:24 -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> Fix timestamp alignment when a scan buffer contains an element larger
> than sizeof(int64_t). Currently s32 quaternions are the only such
> element, and the one driver that has this (hid-sensor-rotation) has a
> workaround in place already so this change does not affect it.
> 
> Previously, we assumed that the timestamp would always be 8-byte aligned
> relative to the end of the scan buffer, but in the case of a scan buffer
> a 16-byte quaternion vector, scan_bytes == 32, but the timestamp needs
> to be placed at offset 16, not 24.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> ---
> 
> To test this, I used hid-sensor-rotation minus the first patch in the
> series so that we can see that the timestamp actually moved to the
> correct location.
> 
> Before this patch, the timestamp (8 bytes ending with "98 18") is in the
> wrong location.
> 
> 00000000  6a 18 00 00 ac f3 ff ff  83 2d 00 00 02 d3 ff ff  |j........-......|
> 00000010  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  5a 17 a0 2a 73 cb 98 18  |........Z..*s...|
> 
> 00000020  ad 17 00 00 6a f4 ff ff  35 2b 00 00 ca d0 ff ff  |....j...5+......|
> 00000030  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  2a a6 bb 30 73 cb 98 18  |........*..0s...|
> 
> 00000040  92 1e 00 00 50 ec ff ff  ea c1 ff ff 78 f0 ff ff  |....P.......x...|
> 00000050  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  8f 3b a7 39 77 cb 98 18  |.........;.9w...|
> 
> After this patch, timestamp is now in the correct location.
> 
> 00000000  55 0f 00 00 dd 1f 00 00  af 0b 00 00 ec 3e 00 00  |U............>..|
> 00000010  c7 17 68 42 6d d0 98 18  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |..hBm...........|
> 
> 00000020  57 0e 00 00 c8 1f 00 00  d1 0e 00 00 42 3e 00 00  |W...........B>..|
> 00000030  56 a2 87 48 6d d0 98 18  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |V..Hm...........|
> 
> 00000040  a3 e2 ff ff d3 1b 00 00  0b c9 ff ff cc 20 00 00  |............. ..|
> 00000050  27 59 4d b3 72 d0 98 18  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |'YM.r...........|
> 
> I also tested this with a different driver not affected by this bug to
> make sure that the timestamp is still in the correct location for all
> other drivers.
> ---
>  include/linux/iio/buffer.h | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> index d37f82678f71..ac19b39bdbe4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> @@ -34,8 +34,16 @@ static inline int iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  	void *data, int64_t timestamp)
>  {
>  	if (ACCESS_PRIVATE(indio_dev, scan_timestamp)) {
> -		size_t ts_offset = indio_dev->scan_bytes / sizeof(int64_t) - 1;
> -		((int64_t *)data)[ts_offset] = timestamp;
> +		size_t ts_offset = indio_dev->scan_bytes -
> +			ACCESS_PRIVATE(indio_dev, largest_scan_element_size);

Given that we're adding a new private member, maybe we could just directly cache the ts_offset
in iio_compute_scan_bytes()? Would make the code a bit easier to follow IMHO

- Nuno Sá
>