From: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
To: Casey Connolly <kcxt@postmarketos.org>,
Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>,
Vincent Huang <vincent.huang@tw.synaptics.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - handle duplicate/unknown PDT entries
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 18:19:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fba4238e-88dc-4e9f-82df-1acdc99346cf@ixit.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f31d10ce-a3dc-4599-8201-8a78aa2fc65f@ixit.cz>
Pushed changes to
https://codeberg.org/sdm845/linux/commits/branch/b4/synaptics-rmi4
On 20/03/2026 18:12, David Heidelberg wrote:
> On 20/03/2026 18:03, Casey Connolly wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20/03/2026 17:54, David Heidelberg wrote:
>>> On 20/03/2026 17:49, Casey Connolly wrote:
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> Nice timing with the series, I hit an OOB access (found it when I
>>>> enabled UBSAN) with this patch the other day.
>>>>
>>>> The pdt_scan_state->pdts array should actually be of size
>>>> (RMI_PDT_MAX+1).
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, I think rmi_pdt_entry_is_valid() is missing a bounds check.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for catching this and for the detailed notes — that’s very
>>> helpful.
>>>
>>> Since you’re the original author of the commit, I’m completely fine with
>>> you taking over the b4 series if you’d prefer. Alternatively, if it’s
>>> easier, feel free to just send me a fixed patch and I can incorporate it.
>>>
>>
>> Uh sure, not sure this will apply cleanly I just edited inline it's a
>> 3-line delta. Also figured we can drop pdt_count since it's unused.
>
> The pdt_count is used in
>
> Input: synaptics-rmi4 - support fallback values for PDT descriptor bytes
>
> thus should be moved there I assume, but can be dropped here.
>
> David
>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
>> b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
>> index ccd9338a44dbe..c7d2f68e65487 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
>> @@ -494,12 +494,39 @@ static void rmi_driver_copy_pdt_to_fd(const struct
>> pdt_entry *pdt,
>> fd->function_version = pdt->function_version;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool rmi_pdt_entry_is_valid(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
>> + struct pdt_scan_state *state, u8 fn)
>> +{
>> + if (fn > RMI_PDT_MAX)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + switch (fn) {
>> + case 0x01:
>> + case 0x03:
>> + case 0x11:
>> + case 0x12:
>> + case 0x30:
>> + case 0x34:
>> + case 0x3a:
>> + case 0x54:
>> + case 0x55:
>> + if (state->pdts[fn] == true)
>> + return false;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + rmi_dbg(RMI_DEBUG_CORE, &rmi_dev->dev,
>> + "PDT has unknown function number %#02x\n", fn);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + state->pdts[fn] = true;
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> #define RMI_SCAN_CONTINUE 0
>> #define RMI_SCAN_DONE 1
>>
>> static int rmi_scan_pdt_page(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
>> int page,
>> - int *empty_pages,
>> + struct pdt_scan_state *state,
>> void *ctx,
>> int (*callback)(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
>> void *ctx,
>> @@ -522,6 +549,9 @@ static int rmi_scan_pdt_page(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev,
>> if (RMI4_END_OF_PDT(pdt_entry.function_number))
>> break;
>>
>> + if (!rmi_pdt_entry_is_valid(rmi_dev, state, pdt_entry.function_number))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> retval = callback(rmi_dev, ctx, &pdt_entry);
>> if (retval != RMI_SCAN_CONTINUE)
>> return retval;
>> @@ -532,11 +562,11 @@ static int rmi_scan_pdt_page(struct rmi_device
>> *rmi_dev,
>> * or more is found, stop scanning.
>> */
>> if (addr == pdt_start)
>> - ++*empty_pages;
>> + ++state->empty_pages;
>> else
>> - *empty_pages = 0;
>> + state->empty_pages = 0;
>>
>> - return (data->bootloader_mode || *empty_pages >= 2) ?
>> + return (data->bootloader_mode || state->empty_pages >= 2) ?
>> RMI_SCAN_DONE : RMI_SCAN_CONTINUE;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -545,11 +575,11 @@ int rmi_scan_pdt(struct rmi_device *rmi_dev, void
>> *ctx,
>> void *ctx, const struct pdt_entry *entry))
>> {
>> int page;
>> - int empty_pages = 0;
>> + struct pdt_scan_state state = {0, {0}};
>> int retval = RMI_SCAN_DONE;
>>
>> for (page = 0; page <= RMI4_MAX_PAGE; page++) {
>> - retval = rmi_scan_pdt_page(rmi_dev, page, &empty_pages,
>> + retval = rmi_scan_pdt_page(rmi_dev, page, &state,
>> ctx, callback);
>> if (retval != RMI_SCAN_CONTINUE)
>> break;
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
>> b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
>> index e84495caab151..a4ae2af93ce3a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
>> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,14 @@ struct pdt_entry {
>> u8 function_number;
>> };
>>
>> +#define RMI_PDT_MAX 0x55
>> +
>> +struct pdt_scan_state {
>> + u8 empty_pages;
>> + bool pdts[RMI_PDT_MAX + 1];
>> +};
>> +
>> #define RMI_REG_DESC_PRESENSE_BITS (32 * BITS_PER_BYTE)
>> #define RMI_REG_DESC_SUBPACKET_BITS (37 * BITS_PER_BYTE)
>>
>>
>
--
David Heidelberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 16:44 [PATCH v7 0/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add quirks for third party touchscreen controllers David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] dt-bindings: input: syna,rmi4: Document syna,rmi4-s3706b David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - handle duplicate/unknown PDT entries David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:49 ` Casey Connolly
2026-03-20 16:54 ` David Heidelberg
2026-03-20 17:03 ` Casey Connolly
2026-03-20 17:12 ` David Heidelberg
2026-03-20 17:19 ` David Heidelberg [this message]
2026-03-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - f12: use hardcoded values for aftermarket touch ICs David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - f55: handle zero electrode count David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - don't do unaligned reads in IRQ context David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - read product ID on aftermarket touch ICs David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
2026-03-20 16:44 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - support fallback values for PDT descriptor bytes David Heidelberg via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fba4238e-88dc-4e9f-82df-1acdc99346cf@ixit.cz \
--to=david@ixit.cz \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=kauschluss@disroot.org \
--cc=kcxt@postmarketos.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.huang@tw.synaptics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox