From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:46:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200910200956.33391.jarod@redhat.com> <200910200958.50574.jarod@redhat.com> <4B0A765F.7010204@redhat.com> <4B0A81BF.4090203@redhat.com> <20091123173726.GE17813@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20091126052155.GD23244@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091126052155.GD23244@core.coreip.homeip.net> (Dmitry Torokhov's message of "Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:21:55 -0800") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jarod Wilson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mario Limonciello , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Janne Grunau , Christoph Bartelmus List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Dmitry Torokhov writes: > In what way the key interface is unsufficient for delivering button > events? At present: 128 different keys only (RC5: one group). One remote per device only. The protocol itself doesn't have the above limitations, but has others, with are acceptable for key input. -- Krzysztof Halasa