From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:46:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:38182 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753226AbZKWVqk (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:46:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Christoph Bartelmus's message of "23 Nov 2009 22:11:00 +0100") Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Bartelmus Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@redhat.com, superm1@ubuntu.com lirc@bartelmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus) writes: >> I think we shouldn't at this time worry about IR transmitters. > > Sorry, but I have to disagree strongly. > Any interface without transmitter support would be absolutely unacceptable > for many LIRC users, including myself. I don't say don't use a transmitter. I say the transmitter is not an input device, they are completely independent functions. I can't see any reason to try and fit both in the same interface - can you? -- Krzysztof Halasa