From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:22:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <9e4733910912041628g5bedc9d2jbee3b0861aeb5511@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910912060838j29f107cpd827e2d7b8a20c1c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:40866 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757566AbZLFUWK (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2009 15:22:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9e4733910912060838j29f107cpd827e2d7b8a20c1c@mail.gmail.com> (Jon Smirl's message of "Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:38:55 -0500") Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Smirl Cc: Christoph Bartelmus , awalls@radix.net, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, kraxel@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@redhat.com, superm1@ubuntu.com Jon Smirl writes: > The in-kernel support can start small and add protocols and maps over > time. Protocols, yes. Maps - we certainly don't want megatons of maps in the kernel. The existing ones have to be removed, some time. -- Krzysztof Halasa