From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhengping Jiang" <jiangzp@google.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: vivaldi: avoid redundant feature report reads per usage
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 21:37:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168627@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012212902.3491839-1-jiangzp@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] hid: feature report fetch bypassed if usage_index == 0 fails early validation
--
commit 31203c2d78508ee9933c6f629cd9827611acfce0
Author: Zhengping Jiang <jiangzp@google.com>
HID: vivaldi: avoid redundant feature report reads per usage
This commit optimizes the vivaldi_feature_mapping() initialization loop by
fetching the hardware feature report only on the first usage. Subsequent
usages in the same field skip the hardware read and reuse the previously
fetched field values.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c b/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c
> index b12bb5cc091aa..69df3a64eb91a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ void vivaldi_feature_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev,
> if (fn_key > data->num_function_row_keys)
> data->num_function_row_keys = fn_key;
>
> + if (usage->usage_index) {
> + data->function_row_physmap[fn_key - MIN_FN_ROW_KEY] =
> + field->value[usage->usage_index];
> + return;
> + }
> +
[Severity: Medium]
Does this fast-path correctly handle cases where the first usage in the
field is bypassed by early validation checks?
Looking at the start of vivaldi_feature_mapping(), there are early returns
for non-ordinal pages and out-of-bounds fn_key values:
void vivaldi_feature_mapping(...)
{
...
if (field->logical != HID_USAGE_FN_ROW_PHYSMAP ||
(usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) != HID_UP_ORDINAL)
return;
fn_key = usage->hid & HID_USAGE;
if (fn_key < MIN_FN_ROW_KEY || fn_key > MAX_FN_ROW_KEY)
return;
If the usage at usage_index == 0 triggers one of these early returns, the
hardware fetch at the end of the function is bypassed.
When the loop processes a valid subsequent usage, such as usage_index == 1,
it will hit this new fast-path. Because the hardware fetch was never
performed, will this copy the initial zeroed memory from field->value into
the physical map and misconfigure the function keys?
> report_data = buf = hid_alloc_report_buf(report, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!report_data)
> return;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012212902.3491839-1-jiangzp@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 21:29 [PATCH] HID: vivaldi: avoid redundant feature report reads per usage Zhengping Jiang
2026-10-12 21:37 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 22:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Zhengping Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168627@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangzp@google.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox