From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Emfox Zhou" <emfox@debian.org>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: receive reports
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 17:35:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-214845@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114170740.2068179-3-emfox@debian.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: shared IRQ race with
thc_ipts_recover()
- [High] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: IRQF_ONESHOT mismatch on shared
INTx in thc_ipts_probe()
- [Medium] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: unconditional IRQ_HANDLED on
shared IRQ
- [Medium] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: short IRQ cause drain in
thc_ipts_thread()
--
commit 880aa0baaa53bf1b19d3aa4aff42c7d2c9c5a798
Author: Emfox Zhou <emfox@debian.org>
HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: receive reports
This commit configures the Rx and Tx DMA engines for Intel IPTS ports,
registers a shared threaded interrupt handler to receive frames, and adds a
work item to reset the receive engine after transfer errors.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/ipts.c b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/ipts.c
> index f139b8f9443d0..790c3eaae15f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/ipts.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/ipts.c
> @@ -20,6 +25,12 @@
> /* Time the controller needs after reset before it answers on the bus. */
> #define THC_IPTS_BOOT_MS 100
>
> +/*
> + * The core returns after the first cause it finds, so one interrupt can need
> + * up to four reads: non-DMA, transaction error, overrun, then the data path.
> + */
> +#define THC_IPTS_IRQ_CAUSES 4
[Severity: Medium]
Is THC_IPTS_IRQ_CAUSES off by one for draining thc_interrupt_handler()?
drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-thc/intel-thc-dev.c:thc_interrupt_handler()
has four separate early returns before it reaches the DMA completion checks:
non-DMA, transaction error, buffer overrun/stall, and fatal error, followed
by the data path on a fifth call. In addition, thc_ipts_read_frames() runs
inside the loop while the port is masked, so new status bits can arrive
before the fourth pass finishes and remain unread when the handler unmasks
the port, leaving a concurrent thc_dma_write() to time out under
thc_bus_lock.
> @@ -127,6 +138,193 @@ static int thc_ipts_touch_set(struct thc_ipts *idev, bool enable)
[ ... ]
> +irqreturn_t thc_ipts_hardirq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct thc_ipts *idev = data;
> +
> + /*
> + * The pin is shared and this may be another function's interrupt; the
> + * cause can only be read in the thread, so claim it. Mask first, or a
> + * level triggered line stays asserted on the way out.
> + */
> + if (READ_ONCE(idev->stopping) || !READ_ONCE(idev->dma_ready)) {
> + thc_interrupt_enable(idev->thc, false);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> + thc_interrupt_enable(idev->thc, false);
> +
> + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +void thc_ipts_recover(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct thc_ipts *idev = container_of(work, struct thc_ipts,
> + recover_work);
> +
> + if (thc_rxdma_reset(idev->thc)) {
> + /* Nothing left: keep the port masked until it restarts. */
> + dev_err(idev->dev, "cannot reset the receive engine\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!READ_ONCE(idev->stopping))
> + thc_interrupt_enable(idev->thc, true);
> +}
> +
> +irqreturn_t thc_ipts_thread(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct thc_ipts *idev = data;
> + bool recovering = false;
> + int pass;
> +
> + /*
> + * The port stays masked until the end of this handler, so a cause that
> + * arrives in between leaves only its status bit: keep reading until
> + * the core reports none.
> + */
> + for (pass = 0; pass < THC_IPTS_IRQ_CAUSES; pass++) {
> + int mask = thc_interrupt_handler(idev->thc);
> +
> + /* The core reports this one when no cause is pending. */
> + if (mask == BIT(THC_UNKNOWN_INT))
> + break;
> +
> + if (mask & (BIT(THC_FATAL_ERR_INT) | BIT(THC_TXN_ERR_INT))) {
> + dev_err(idev->dev,
> + "transfer error, resetting the engine\n");
> + recovering = true;
> + /*
> + * Keep reading: the core stops at the first cause, so
> + * a Tx completion queued behind the error would wait
> + * out its timeout under the bus lock.
> + */
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (recovering)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * A non-DMA cause needs no action: the core acknowledges it,
> + * and this port moves report data through the DMA engines.
> + */
> + if (mask & BIT(THC_RXDMA2_INT) && thc_ipts_read_frames(idev))
> + recovering = true;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The work item resets the engine and unmasks the port again; reading
> + * frames while it rewrites the ring would corrupt the descriptors.
> + */
> + if (recovering) {
> + schedule_work(&idev->recover_work);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> + if (!READ_ONCE(idev->stopping))
> + thc_interrupt_enable(idev->thc, true);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
[Severity: High]
Can a shared interrupt from another PCH function wake thc_ipts_thread() while
thc_ipts_recover() is resetting the DMA engine?
Because recovering is only a local variable in thc_ipts_thread(), idev->stopping
remains false and idev->dma_ready remains true after recover_work is
scheduled. When another device on the shared INTx line fires an interrupt:
irq/idev->irq kworker
thc_ipts_thread()
recovering = true
schedule_work(&recover_work)
return IRQ_HANDLED
thc_ipts_recover()
thc_rxdma_reset(idev->thc)
thc_dma_unconfigure()
<shared INTx from another device>
thc_ipts_hardirq()
return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD
thc_ipts_thread()
thc_ipts_read_frames()
thc_rxdma_read() <-- races with thc_rxdma_reset()
thc_interrupt_enable(..., true) <-- unmasks port mid-reset
If no THC cause is pending during that foreign interrupt, thc_ipts_thread()
sees BIT(THC_UNKNOWN_INT) with recovering == false and calls
thc_interrupt_enable(idev->thc, true), unmasking the port while
thc_rxdma_reset() is reconfiguring the PRD tables or after thc_rxdma_reset()
has failed.
[Severity: Medium]
Should thc_ipts_hardirq() and thc_ipts_thread() return IRQ_NONE when no
interrupt came from this controller?
In thc_ipts_hardirq(), returning IRQ_HANDLED while idev->stopping is true or
idev->dma_ready is false (such as during the 100 ms boot delay in
thc_ipts_port_start() after the IRQ is requested) claims every shared
interrupt on the line. Likewise, when a foreign device triggers the shared
INTx line during normal operation and thc_ipts_thread() breaks out on
pass == 0 with BIT(THC_UNKNOWN_INT), returning IRQ_HANDLED increments
desc->threads_handled and prevents note_interrupt() in kernel/irq/spurious.c
from detecting a screaming unhandled interrupt on the shared line.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/pci-ipts.c b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/pci-ipts.c
> index 48046cd1212a6..5342cf25224fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/pci-ipts.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-ipts/pci-ipts.c
> @@ -77,10 +78,38 @@ static int thc_ipts_probe(struct pci_dev *pci, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> if (IS_ERR(idev->thc))
> return PTR_ERR(idev->thc);
>
> + /*
> + * Interrupt remapping rejects the MSI requests these ports send, so
> + * take the legacy pin (shared with other functions on the PCH, hence
> + * IRQF_SHARED); MSI is only for a platform that routes no pin.
> + */
> + ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pci, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_INTX);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_warn(idev->dev, "no interrupt pin, falling back to MSI\n");
> + ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pci, 1, 1,
> + PCI_IRQ_MSI | PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> + }
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(idev->dev, "no interrupt vector, error %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + idev->irq = pci_irq_vector(pci, 0);
> +
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(idev->dev, idev->irq, thc_ipts_hardirq,
> + thc_ipts_thread,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> + KBUILD_MODNAME, idev);
[Severity: High]
Does requesting the shared INTx line with IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED fail with
-EBUSY when another PCH driver shares the pin?
__setup_irq() requires all actions on a shared IRQ line to agree on
IRQF_ONESHOT:
kernel/irq/manage.c:__setup_irq() {
...
if ((old->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT) &&
(new->flags & IRQF_COND_ONESHOT))
new->flags |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
if (!((old->flags & new->flags) & IRQF_SHARED) ||
((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) ||
((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_ONESHOT))
goto mismatch;
...
}
Other PCH drivers that share legacy INTx pins (such as intel-lpss, i2c-i801,
intel-ish-hid, or mei_me) register without IRQF_ONESHOT, so
devm_request_threaded_irq() returns -EBUSY if any of them probed first (or
causes a later threaded-IRQ driver like mei_me to fail with -EBUSY if
intel-ipts probed first). Since thc_ipts_hardirq() already masks the port
interrupt in hardware via thc_interrupt_enable(idev->thc, false), IRQF_ONESHOT
can be dropped (or replaced with IRQF_COND_ONESHOT).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261114170740.2068179-1-emfox@debian.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 17:07 [PATCH v2 0/5] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: support THC IPTS ports Emfox Zhou
2026-11-14 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: bring up the port Emfox Zhou
2026-11-14 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: receive reports Emfox Zhou
2026-11-14 17:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-14 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: register the HID device Emfox Zhou
2026-11-14 17:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: handle system sleep Emfox Zhou
2026-11-14 17:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-ipts: document the IPTS mode Emfox Zhou
2026-11-14 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-214845@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=emfox@debian.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox