From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:59966 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751480AbdJRRzY (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:55:24 -0400
Subject: Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
        Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
        Kenneth Goldman <kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_H=c3=bcwe?= <PeterHuewe@gmx.de>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <c8d37c0407a949c1abb35cfd79c17f58@infineon.com>
 <1508244757.4234.60.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710171456360.5035@hadrien>
 <1508253453.4234.81.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <9689f036-ba9f-d23b-cf89-c289bc308771@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20171018145735.lpzwakatsty7emlw@linux.intel.com>
 <351cf78a-14f6-c6e7-2902-048e7dc57a14@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20171018155946.e7ga7jyex6eia252@linux.intel.com>
 <55d76224-3019-6614-70ce-ba260bbcd54f@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20171018171858.3lcfr2kcp53fngwv@linux.intel.com>
 <20171018172209.dn3jwl3juzsvkn7c@linux.intel.com>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <05fbc8e6-3743-f51b-21fe-73d6d1af32f7@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:54:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171018172209.dn3jwl3juzsvkn7c@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org>

> One more word of advice: send the three as separate patches.

I do not see a need for an immediate resend at the moment.


> My guess is that it takes a factor longer time to apply 4/4
> than other patches because there's more limited crowd who can test it.

This is fine for me if somebody would like to integrate
this update suggestion at all.


How do you think about to separate replies better between affected
update steps?

Regards,
Markus