From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:64625 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730724AbeHGC0U (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2018 22:26:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 2/2] tpm: add support for nonblocking operation To: James Bottomley , jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com Cc: flihp@twobit.us, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <153358975874.26901.16081444242758666628.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com> <153359005823.27531.1050952672299708433.stgit@tstruk-mobl1.jf.intel.com> <1533596748.3159.19.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: Tadeusz Struk Message-ID: <1064594c-3a3f-4d2a-5d94-e8314b330292@intel.com> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 17:09:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1533596748.3159.19.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/06/2018 04:05 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > For an async interface, shouldn't I be able to queue an > arbitrary number of commands without blocking? That was the approach in the v1 version of this patch, but Jason requested this to be changed so that only one command at a time can be processed. Thanks, -- Tadeusz