From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:49170 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965905AbdJQT2a (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:28:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9HJQ4Wp060345 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:28:30 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dnk9nxs0d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:28:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:28:28 +0100 Subject: Re: char/tpm: Improve a size determination in nine functions From: Mimi Zohar To: SF Markus Elfring , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Julia Lawall , Alexander Steffen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Corentin Labbe , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jason Gunthorpe , Jerry Snitselaar , Kenneth Goldman , Michael Ellerman , Nayna Jain , Paul Mackerras , Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=FCwe?= , Stefan Berger Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 15:28:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9689f036-ba9f-d23b-cf89-c289bc308771@users.sourceforge.net> References: <1d3516a2-a8e6-9e95-d438-f115fac84c7f@users.sourceforge.net> <83a166af-aecc-649d-dfe3-a72245345209@users.sourceforge.net> <1508238182.16112.475.camel@linux.intel.com> <1508244757.4234.60.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1508253453.4234.81.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <9689f036-ba9f-d23b-cf89-c289bc308771@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1508268493.4513.39.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 20:41 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > Do you find my wording "This issue was detected by using the > Coccinelle software." insufficient? The question is not whether it is insufficient, but whether it is appropriate. Detecting Coccinelle issues is one step. The next step is deciding what to do with them. Up to now, these messages have been sent out as informational, not as patches. Before sending patches to change existing code, address the "problem" so that it doesn't continue to happen. Only afterwards is it appropriate to discuss what to do with existing code. Mimi