public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@huawei.com>,
	Mikhail Kurinnoi <viewizard@viewizard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] EVM: Add support for portable signature format
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 10:08:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509718138.3416.39.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171102220824.9576-1-mjg59@google.com>

On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 15:08 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The EVM signature includes the inode number and (optionally) the
> filesystem UUID, making it impractical to ship EVM signatures in
> packages. This patch adds a new portable format intended to allow
> distributions to include EVM signatures. It is identical to the existing
> format but hardcodes the inode and generation numbers to 0 and does not
> include the filesystem UUID even if the kernel is configured to do so.
> 
> Removing the inode means that the metadata and signature from one file
> could be copied to another file without invalidating it. This is avoided
> by ensuring that an IMA xattr is present during EVM validation.
> 
> Portable signatures are intended to be immutable - ie, they will never
> be transformed into HMACs.
> 
> Based on earlier work by Dmitry Kasatkin and Mikhail Kurinnoi.

Looks good.  Just a couple of minor comments ...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@huawei.com>
> Cc: Mikhail Kurinnoi <viewizard@viewizard.com>
> ---
>  A mechanism for modifying files and metadata will come in a followup mail
> 
>  include/linux/integrity.h             |  1 +
>  security/integrity/evm/evm.h          |  2 +-
>  security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c   | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c     | 23 ++++++----
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c |  4 +-
>  security/integrity/integrity.h        |  2 +
>  6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/integrity.h b/include/linux/integrity.h
> index c2d6082a1a4c..858d3f4a2241 100644
> --- a/include/linux/integrity.h
> +++ b/include/linux/integrity.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> 
>  enum integrity_status {
>  	INTEGRITY_PASS = 0,
> +	INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE,
>  	INTEGRITY_FAIL,
>  	INTEGRITY_NOLABEL,
>  	INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS,
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm.h b/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
> index f5f12727771a..2ff02459fcfd 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int evm_calc_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, const char *req_xattr_name,
>  		  size_t req_xattr_value_len, char *digest);
>  int evm_calc_hash(struct dentry *dentry, const char *req_xattr_name,
>  		  const char *req_xattr_value,
> -		  size_t req_xattr_value_len, char *digest);
> +		  size_t req_xattr_value_len, char type, char *digest);
>  int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr,
>  		  char *hmac_val);
>  int evm_init_secfs(void);
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> index 1d32cd20009a..785fbc77c0c3 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static struct shash_desc *init_desc(char type)
>   * protection.)
>   */
>  static void hmac_add_misc(struct shash_desc *desc, struct inode *inode,
> -			  char *digest)
> +			  char type, char *digest)
>  {
>  	struct h_misc {
>  		unsigned long ino;
> @@ -149,8 +149,13 @@ static void hmac_add_misc(struct shash_desc *desc, struct inode *inode,
>  	} hmac_misc;
> 
>  	memset(&hmac_misc, 0, sizeof(hmac_misc));
> -	hmac_misc.ino = inode->i_ino;
> -	hmac_misc.generation = inode->i_generation;
> +	/* Don't include the inode or generation number in portable
> +	 * signatures
> +	 */
> +	if (type != EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG) {
> +		hmac_misc.ino = inode->i_ino;
> +		hmac_misc.generation = inode->i_generation;
> +	}
>  	/* The hmac uid and gid must be encoded in the initial user
>  	 * namespace (not the filesystems user namespace) as encoding
>  	 * them in the filesystems user namespace allows an attack
> @@ -163,7 +168,8 @@ static void hmac_add_misc(struct shash_desc *desc, struct inode *inode,
>  	hmac_misc.gid = from_kgid(&init_user_ns, inode->i_gid);
>  	hmac_misc.mode = inode->i_mode;
>  	crypto_shash_update(desc, (const u8 *)&hmac_misc, sizeof(hmac_misc));
> -	if (evm_hmac_attrs & EVM_ATTR_FSUUID)
> +	if ((evm_hmac_attrs & EVM_ATTR_FSUUID) &&
> +	    type != EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG)
>  		crypto_shash_update(desc, &inode->i_sb->s_uuid.b[0],
>  				    sizeof(inode->i_sb->s_uuid));
>  	crypto_shash_final(desc, digest);
> @@ -189,6 +195,7 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry,
>  	char *xattr_value = NULL;
>  	int error;
>  	int size;
> +	bool ima_present = false;
> 
>  	if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR))
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -199,11 +206,18 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry,
> 
>  	error = -ENODATA;
>  	for (xattrname = evm_config_xattrnames; *xattrname != NULL; xattrname++) {
> +		bool is_ima = false;
> +
> +		if (strcmp(*xattrname, XATTR_NAME_IMA) == 0)
> +			is_ima = true;
> +
>  		if ((req_xattr_name && req_xattr_value)
>  		    && !strcmp(*xattrname, req_xattr_name)) {
>  			error = 0;
>  			crypto_shash_update(desc, (const u8 *)req_xattr_value,
>  					     req_xattr_value_len);
> +			if (is_ima)
> +				ima_present = true;
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		size = vfs_getxattr_alloc(dentry, *xattrname,
> @@ -218,9 +232,14 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry,
>  		error = 0;
>  		xattr_size = size;
>  		crypto_shash_update(desc, (const u8 *)xattr_value, xattr_size);
> +		if (is_ima)
> +			ima_present = true;
>  	}
> -	hmac_add_misc(desc, inode, digest);
> +	hmac_add_misc(desc, inode, type, digest);
> 
> +	/* Portable EVM signatures must include an IMA hash */
> +	if (type == EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG && !ima_present)
> +		return -EPERM;
>  out:
>  	kfree(xattr_value);
>  	kfree(desc);
> @@ -232,17 +251,45 @@ int evm_calc_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, const char *req_xattr_name,
>  		  char *digest)
>  {
>  	return evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(dentry, req_xattr_name, req_xattr_value,
> -				req_xattr_value_len, EVM_XATTR_HMAC, digest);
> +			       req_xattr_value_len, EVM_XATTR_HMAC, digest);
>  }
> 
>  int evm_calc_hash(struct dentry *dentry, const char *req_xattr_name,
>  		  const char *req_xattr_value, size_t req_xattr_value_len,
> -		  char *digest)
> +		  char type, char *digest)
>  {
>  	return evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(dentry, req_xattr_name, req_xattr_value,
> -				req_xattr_value_len, IMA_XATTR_DIGEST, digest);
> +				     req_xattr_value_len, type, digest);
>  }
> 
> +static int evm_is_immutable(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_data = NULL;
> +	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> +	int rc = 0;
> +
> +	iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
> +	if (iint && (iint->flags & EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	/* Do this the hard way */
> +	rc = vfs_getxattr_alloc(dentry, XATTR_NAME_EVM, (char **)&xattr_data, 0,
> +				GFP_NOFS);
> +	if (rc <= 0) {
> +		if (rc == -ENODATA)
> +			return 0;
> +		return rc;
> +	}
> +	if (xattr_data->type == EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG)
> +		rc = 1;
> +	else
> +		rc = 0;
> +
> +	kfree(xattr_data);
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +
>  /*
>   * Calculate the hmac and update security.evm xattr
>   *
> @@ -253,8 +300,23 @@ int evm_update_evmxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
>  {
>  	struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
>  	struct evm_ima_xattr_data xattr_data;
> +	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
>  	int rc = 0;
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Don't permit any transformation of the EVM xattr if the signature
> +	 * is of an immutable type
> +	 */
> +	rc = evm_is_immutable(dentry, inode);
> +	if (rc < 0)
> +		return rc;
> +	if (rc)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
> +	if (iint && (iint->flags & EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +

This check is now in evm_is_immutable().

>  	rc = evm_calc_hmac(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
>  			   xattr_value_len, xattr_data.digest);
>  	if (rc == 0) {
> @@ -280,7 +342,7 @@ int evm_init_hmac(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *lsm_xattr,
>  	}
> 
>  	crypto_shash_update(desc, lsm_xattr->value, lsm_xattr->value_len);
> -	hmac_add_misc(desc, inode, hmac_val);
> +	hmac_add_misc(desc, inode, EVM_XATTR_HMAC, hmac_val);
>  	kfree(desc);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> index 063d38aef64e..675a835b6d6d 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
>  	enum integrity_status evm_status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
>  	int rc, xattr_len;
> 
> -	if (iint && iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS)
> +	if (iint && (iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS ||
> +		     iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE))
>  		return iint->evm_status;
> 
>  	/* if status is not PASS, try to check again - against -ENOMEM */
> @@ -161,22 +162,26 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry,
>  			rc = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
>  	case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG:
> +	case EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG:
>  		rc = evm_calc_hash(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
> -				xattr_value_len, calc.digest);
> +				   xattr_value_len, xattr_data->type,
> +				   calc.digest);
>  		if (rc)
>  			break;
>  		rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_EVM,
>  					(const char *)xattr_data, xattr_len,
>  					calc.digest, sizeof(calc.digest));
>  		if (!rc) {
> -			/* Replace RSA with HMAC if not mounted readonly and
> -			 * not immutable
> -			 */
> -			if (!IS_RDONLY(d_backing_inode(dentry)) &&
> -			    !IS_IMMUTABLE(d_backing_inode(dentry)))
> +			if (xattr_data->type == EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG) {
> +				if (iint)
> +					iint->flags |= EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG;
> +				evm_status = INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE;
> +			} else if (!IS_RDONLY(d_backing_inode(dentry)) &&
> +				   !IS_IMMUTABLE(d_backing_inode(dentry))) {
>  				evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, xattr_name,
>  						    xattr_value,
>  						    xattr_value_len);
> +			}
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	default:
> @@ -292,6 +297,7 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,

The function description should be updated to reflect portable
signatures (eg. with the necessary permissions, when the existing
value is invalid or immutable.)

Although this patch does not modify evm_inode_setattr(), it changes
it's behavior.  Please update the function comment.

Mimi

>  			return 0;
>  		evm_status = evm_verify_current_integrity(dentry);
>  		if ((evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS) ||
> +		    (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE) ||
>  		    (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS))
>  			return 0;
>  		goto out;
> @@ -345,7 +351,8 @@ int evm_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
>  	if (strcmp(xattr_name, XATTR_NAME_EVM) == 0) {
>  		if (!xattr_value_len)
>  			return -EINVAL;
> -		if (xattr_data->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)
> +		if (xattr_data->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG &&
> +		    xattr_data->type != EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG)
>  			return -EPERM;
>  	}
>  	return evm_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index 809ba70fbbbf..8336c70dc6bc 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
>  	}
> 
>  	status = evm_verifyxattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA, xattr_value, rc, iint);
> -	if ((status != INTEGRITY_PASS) && (status != INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN)) {
> +	if ((status != INTEGRITY_PASS) &&
> +	    (status != INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE) &&
> +	    (status != INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN)) {
>  		if ((status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL)
>  		    || (status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS))
>  			cause = "missing-HMAC";
> diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> index a53e7e4ab06c..cbc7de33fac7 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #define IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED	0x02000000
>  #define IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO	0x04000000
>  #define IMA_NEW_FILE		0x08000000
> +#define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG	0x10000000
> 
>  #define IMA_DO_MASK		(IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \
>  				 IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
> @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ enum evm_ima_xattr_type {
>  	EVM_XATTR_HMAC,
>  	EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG,
>  	IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG,
> +	EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG,
>  	IMA_XATTR_LAST
>  };
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-03 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-02 22:08 [PATCH V4] EVM: Add support for portable signature format Matthew Garrett
2017-11-03 14:08 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1509718138.3416.39.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=viewizard@viewizard.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox