From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:46330 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752616AbdKHUqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:46:30 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vA8KhgCJ012412 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:46:29 -0500 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2e4896b3qx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:46:29 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 20:46:27 -0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode From: Mimi Zohar To: James Morris , Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Howells , linux-integrity , Matthew Garrett , linux-security-module Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:46:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1509382827.3583.143.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1508774387.3639.128.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <750.1509378910@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3691.1509383138@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1509385178.3583.159.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1510173982.4484.30.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: [Cc'ing Stephen Rothwell] On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:25 +1100, James Morris wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > James is staging the subsystem patches independently of each other, in > > case of a similar problem, so that they can be pulled separately. > > There's a new "next-general" branch. > > If you send me a pull request, I'm combining branches into next-testing, > too, which is pulled into -next. linux-next already has the IMA patches, which might be confusing. Mimi