linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: wangjunwen@baidu.com, linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] evm: Don't deadlock if a crypto algorithm is unavailable
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 18:26:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1527892001.13403.21.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACdnJutAGYyB2FW9W-0v2yVDHdAwcm0KQY7pUao8hsjf8ifw6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:52 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:21 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 14:06 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > EVM looks like it SELECTs CONFIG_SHA1, so I /think/ it should be ok
> > > before that patch?
> >
> > According to Junwen, with CONFIG_TRUSTED_KEYS enabled the HMAC and
> > SHA1 are allocated at __init.  The locking problem occurs when
> > CONFIG_TRUSTED_KEYS is not enabled.  His solution would have been to
> > move the crypto_alloc_shash() in EVM to an __init function.
> 
> Ok - I think just allowing it to be deferred is preferable, since
> otherwise we'd have to build in every hash algorithm that could be
> used for the signatures (which wasn't a problem before the non-sha1
> patch). How would you prefer me to send these two? The non-sha1 patch
> isn't in -next, so I can't add a fixes: for it at this point.

Switch the order of the two patches.  The bug fix goes first, then the
non-sha1 patch.  Remember we need an Ack from Herbert Xu for
introducing CRYPTO_NOLOAD.

Mimi 

      reply	other threads:[~2018-06-01 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-15 17:53 [PATCH V4] evm: Allow non-SHA1 digital signatures Matthew Garrett
2018-05-16 22:12 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-17 22:09   ` Matthew Garrett
2018-05-18 16:03     ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-29 18:26       ` Matthew Garrett
     [not found]         ` <15252CF8C1B4384C8CE16D7D55C66479011414E7BF@BC-MAIL-M04.internal.baidu.com>
2018-05-30 18:29           ` Matthew Garrett
2018-05-30 20:28             ` [PATCH] evm: Don't deadlock if a crypto algorithm is unavailable Matthew Garrett
     [not found]               ` <15252CF8C1B4384C8CE16D7D55C66479011414E83B@BC-MAIL-M04.internal.baidu.com>
2018-05-31 19:30                 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-05-31 19:55                   ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-31 20:07                     ` Matthew Garrett
2018-05-31 20:32                       ` Mimi Zohar
2018-05-31 21:06                         ` Matthew Garrett
2018-06-01 11:21                           ` Mimi Zohar
2018-06-01 20:52                             ` Matthew Garrett
2018-06-01 22:26                               ` Mimi Zohar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1527892001.13403.21.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=wangjunwen@baidu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).