From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
sgrubb@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ima: Differentiate auditing policy rules from "audit" actions
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 10:52:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1528296743.3255.29.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhSbdYOkcszy+emgPNWWtUc0LoWy8pPvov+qjubV7b_EjQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 18:18 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 20:21 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Stefan Berger
> >> <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> > The AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE is used for auditing IMA policy rules and
> >> > the IMA "audit" policy action. This patch defines
> >> > AUDIT_INTEGRITY_POLICY_RULE to reflect the IMA policy rules.
> >> >
> >> > Since we defined a new message type we can now also pass the
> >> > audit_context and get an associated SYSCALL record. This now produces
> >> > the following records when parsing IMA policy's rules:
> >>
> >> Aaand now I see you included the current->audit_context pointer I
> >> mentioned in my comments for 3/4 ;)
> >>
> >> So basically this should be fine, although I should point out that you
> >> do not need to define a new message type to associate records
> >> together. The fact that we don't associate all connected records is
> >> basically a bug.
> >>
> >> Anyway, patches 3/4 and 4/4 look good to me. Considering this is
> >> likely going in during the *next* merge window, I would ask that you
> >> convert from "current->audit_context" to "audit_context()" as soon as
> >> this merge window closes.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > Thanks, Paul. I'd like to start queueing patches for the next open
> > window now, instead of scrambling later. Can I add your Ack now, and
> > remember to make this change when rebasing?
>
> Sure, go ahead and add my ACK to both 3/4 and 4/4 as long as you
> double pinky swear you'll do the audit_context() fix-up during the
> merge :)
>
> Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Sure, it will be really hard to miss. The next-integrity-queued
branch has:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
*** Remember replace current->audit_context with call to audit_context() ***
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-04 20:54 [PATCH v3 0/4] IMA: work on audit records produced by IMA Stefan Berger
2018-06-04 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ima: Call audit_log_string() rather than logging it untrusted Stefan Berger
2018-06-04 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ima: Use audit_log_format() rather than audit_log_string() Stefan Berger
2018-06-04 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ima: Do not audit if CONFIG_INTEGRITY_AUDIT is not set Stefan Berger
2018-06-05 0:16 ` Paul Moore
2018-06-04 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ima: Differentiate auditing policy rules from "audit" actions Stefan Berger
2018-06-05 0:21 ` Paul Moore
2018-06-05 14:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2018-06-05 22:18 ` Paul Moore
2018-06-06 14:52 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1528296743.3255.29.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).