From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] NFSD: Remove ima_file_check call
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:29:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553027371.4899.116.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <872F3DFD-E1A7-443E-B666-25C5931F0748@oracle.com>
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 16:29 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
Thanks Serge for bringing this thread to my attention. Sorry for the
delay in responding ...
> > On Mar 8, 2019, at 4:23 PM, Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 04:11:06PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mar 8, 2019, at 4:10 PM, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:28:54AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>>> The NFS server needs to allow NFS clients to perform their own
> >>>> attestation and measurement.
Measurement and attestation is only one aspect. The other aspect is
verifying the integrity of files. Shouldn't the NFS server verify the
integrity of a file before allowing it to be served (eg. malware)?
> >>>
> >>> Can we really remove this call?
> >>
> >> Why wouldn't we be able to?
> >
> > I don't know the first thing about IMA, but surely it's there for some
> > reason--
>
> It was originally added because the number of opens and closes of @file
> were counted, and not having that call was triggering a warning. Since
> commit 8eb988c70e770 ("fix ima breakage") the counters are maintained
> separately.
If that was the only reason, then the call itself would have been
removed with the counter code.
Mimi
>
>
> > is it really OK just to skip this on opens by nfsd?
>
> That's why I split this out into a separate patch. I'm hoping to get
> some commentary from the linux-integrity community.
>
>
> > --b.
> >
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 6 ------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> >>>> index 3c00072..524c6e5 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> >>>> @@ -802,12 +802,6 @@ static int nfsd_open_break_lease(struct inode *inode, int access)
> >>>> goto out_nfserr;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> - host_err = ima_file_check(file, may_flags);
> >>>> - if (host_err) {
> >>>> - fput(file);
> >>>> - goto out_nfserr;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> -
> >>>> if (may_flags & NFSD_MAY_64BIT_COOKIE)
> >>>> file->f_mode |= FMODE_64BITHASH;
> >>>> else
> >>
> >> --
> >> Chuck Lever
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-19 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-07 15:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] RFC: Linux IMA on NFS prototype Chuck Lever
2019-03-07 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] NFS: Define common IMA-related protocol elements Chuck Lever
2019-03-07 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] NFSD: Prototype support for IMA on NFS (server) Chuck Lever
2019-03-07 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] NFSD: Remove ima_file_check call Chuck Lever
2019-03-08 21:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-03-08 21:11 ` Chuck Lever
2019-03-08 21:23 ` Bruce Fields
2019-03-08 21:29 ` Chuck Lever
2019-03-19 20:29 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-03-20 13:40 ` Chuck Lever
2019-03-21 11:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-21 14:04 ` Chuck Lever
2019-03-22 22:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-25 14:24 ` Chuck Lever
2019-03-25 15:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-07 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] NFS: Rename security xattr handler Chuck Lever
2019-03-07 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] NFS: Prototype support for IMA on NFS (client) Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1553027371.4899.116.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).