From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E498C4740A for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2B721924 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727980AbfIIRZH (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:25:07 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:64050 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726864AbfIIRZH (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:25:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x89HM0Zd035000 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 13:25:06 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uwtehsssm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:25:05 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:25:04 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:25:01 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x89HP0up49676314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:25:00 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B96A405C; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:25:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F09AA4054; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:24:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-196.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.196]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:24:59 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: KEYS-TRUSTED git From: Mimi Zohar To: Jarkko Sakkinen , dhowells@redhat.com Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com, sumit.garg@linaro.org Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:24:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190909165200.npxq3hkft4bddv6v@linux.intel.com> References: <1567952431.4614.140.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20190909165200.npxq3hkft4bddv6v@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19090917-0020-0000-0000-00000369E8AB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19090917-0021-0000-0000-000021BF6AB6 Message-Id: <1568049898.4614.349.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-09_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=871 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909090178 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 17:52 +0100, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 10:20:31AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > Thanks, Jarkko.  Agreed, trusted keys is becoming more than just TPM > > based keys.  Now would be a good time to set up at least a separate > > branch or GIT repo. > > I created a tree for trusted keys: > > http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-trusted-keys.git > > The remaining issue before I send a patch to update MAINTAINERS is whether > the flow goes through David to Linus or directly to Linus. David?