From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eric.snowberg@oracle.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com, matthewgarrett@google.com,
sashal@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:01:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1576868506.5241.65.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218164434.2877-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 08:44 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> This patchset extends the previous version[1] by adding support for
> deferred processing of keys.
>
> With the patchset referenced above, the IMA subsystem supports
> measuring asymmetric keys when the key is created or updated.
> But keys created or updated before a custom IMA policy is loaded
> are currently not measured. This includes keys added to, for instance,
> .builtin_trusted_keys which happens early in the boot process.
>
> This change adds support for queuing keys created or updated before
> a custom IMA policy is loaded. The queued keys are processed when
> a custom policy is loaded. Keys created or updated after a custom policy
> is loaded are measured immediately (not queued).
>
> If the kernel is built with both CONFIG_IMA and
> CONFIG_ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE enabled then the IMA policy
> must be applied as a custom policy. Not providing a custom policy
> in the above configuration would result in asymmeteric keys being queued
> until a custom policy is loaded. This is by design.
I didn't notice the "This is by design" here, referring to the memory
never being freed. "This is by design" was suppose to refer to
requiring a custom policy for measuring keys.
For now, these two patches are queued in the next-integrity-testing
branch, but I would appreciate your addressing not freeing the memory
associated with the keys, if a custom policy is not loaded.
Please note that I truncated the 2/2 patch description, as it repeats
the existing verification example in commit ("2b60c0ecedf8 IMA: Read
keyrings= option from the IMA policy").
thanks,
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-20 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-18 16:44 [PATCH v5 0/2] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-18 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] IMA: Define workqueue for early boot "key" measurements Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-19 13:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-19 16:55 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-20 12:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-18 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-20 19:01 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-12-20 19:25 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-12-20 19:36 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-20 20:50 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1576868506.5241.65.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthewgarrett@google.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).