From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: vfs_getxattr_alloc() problem
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:51:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1587685908.5610.91.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a47df5af2e2d4bc4bc4757e956c882eb@huawei.com>
[Cc'ing Matthew]
Hi Roberto,
On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 10:58 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Hi Mimi
>
> I found a problem in the calculation of the EVM digest.
>
> If an xattr is in the security domain, vfs_getxattr() calls xattr_getsecurity(),
> which is implemented by LSMs. vfs_getxattr_alloc() instead calls directly
> the filesystem function to read xattrs.
>
> The problem arises for example when you have a file with a portable
> signature on the correct SELinux label (with \0) and you set security.selinux
> manually:
>
> setfattr -n security.selinux -v "system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0" cat
>
> Although the length passed is 26 bytes (without \0), you get:
>
> # attr -l cat
> Attribute "selinux" has a 27 byte value for cat
>
> which includes \0.
>
> From user space, evmctl does not complain (the signature is ok) because
> it calculates the EVM digest with \0, but EVM verification fails (because it
> calculates the digest without \0).
>
> Should this problem be fixed?
I don't seem to be having any problems verifying the EVM immutable &
portable signatures. To test, I've copied a properly labeled file
twice, once with the "--preserve=xattr" and once without it. I signed
the properly labeled file with the EVM immutable & portable signature.
On the other file, I first set the selinux label before signing it.
If there was a problem manually writing the SELinux label, the
security.evm labels would be different, which they aren't.
Matthew, are you able to reproduce Roberto's problem?
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 10:58 vfs_getxattr_alloc() problem Roberto Sassu
2020-04-23 23:51 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-04-24 14:32 ` Roberto Sassu
2020-04-27 18:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-04-27 19:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-04-28 7:02 ` Roberto Sassu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1587685908.5610.91.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).