From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
Cc: "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
Silviu Vlasceanu <Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: vfs_getxattr_alloc() problem
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:19:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1588015195.16086.3.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1588013688.4553.7.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:54 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 14:32 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > Hi Roberto,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2020-04-21 at 10:58 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > > Hi Mimi
> > > >
> > > > I found a problem in the calculation of the EVM digest.
> > > >
> > > > If an xattr is in the security domain, vfs_getxattr() calls xattr_getsecurity(),
> > > > which is implemented by LSMs. vfs_getxattr_alloc() instead calls directly
> > > > the filesystem function to read xattrs.
> > > >
> > > > The problem arises for example when you have a file with a portable
> > > > signature on the correct SELinux label (with \0) and you set
> > > security.selinux
> > > > manually:
> > > >
> > > > setfattr -n security.selinux -v "system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0" cat
> > > >
> > > > Although the length passed is 26 bytes (without \0), you get:
> > > >
> > > > # attr -l cat
> > > > Attribute "selinux" has a 27 byte value for cat
> > > >
> > > > which includes \0.
> > > >
> > > > From user space, evmctl does not complain (the signature is ok) because
> > > > it calculates the EVM digest with \0, but EVM verification fails (because it
> > > > calculates the digest without \0).
> > > >
> > > > Should this problem be fixed?
> > >
> > > I don't seem to be having any problems verifying the EVM immutable &
> > > portable signatures. To test, I've copied a properly labeled file
> > > twice, once with the "--preserve=xattr" and once without it. I signed
> > > the properly labeled file with the EVM immutable & portable signature.
> > > On the other file, I first set the selinux label before signing it.
> > > If there was a problem manually writing the SELinux label, the
> > > security.evm labels would be different, which they aren't.
> >
> > [root@vm demo]# ls -lZ /bin/cat
> > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 85520 Apr 24 16:20 /bin/cat
> > [root@vm demo]# evmctl sign -o -a sha256 --imahash --key $PWD/signing_key.pem /bin/cat -v -v
> > hash(sha256): 0404d3d78d8249317ed50056ec7d04da382488f36a6127f4e9161792d97f13e10bc6
> > name: security.selinux, size: 27
> > 73797374656d5f753a6f626a6563745f723a62696e5f743a733000
> > no xattr: security.SMACK64
> > no xattr: security.apparmor
> > name: security.ima, size: 34
> > 0404d3d78d8249317ed50056ec7d04da382488f36a6127f4e9161792d97f13e10bc6
> > no xattr: security.capability
> > calc_evm_hash:532 hmac_misc (24): 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000ed810000
> > hash(sha256): 331e36ce1b32374a22e12df28b58d79536c0ee97ba01451bd60343191c073b55
> > calc_keyid_v2:735 keyid: aecec286
> > keyid: aecec286
> > evm/ima signature: 520 bytes
> > ...
> > [root@vm demo]# cat
> > ^C
> > [root@vm demo]# setfattr -n security.selinux -v "system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0" /bin/cat
>
> In the past, when I looked at writing the same SELinux label, there
> was some performance improvement that only updated the label if the
> label actually changed. Unless things have changed since, I don't
> think the same selinux label is rewritten.
>
> > [root@vm demo]# evmctl verify -o -a sha256 --imahash /bin/cat -v -v
> > calc_keyid_v2:735 keyid: aecec286
> > keyid: aecec286
> > key 1: aecec286 /etc/keys/x509_evm.der
> > name: security.selinux, size: 27
> > 73797374656d5f753a6f626a6563745f723a62696e5f743a733000
> > no xattr: security.SMACK64
> > no xattr: security.apparmor
> > name: security.ima, size: 34
> > 0404d3d78d8249317ed50056ec7d04da382488f36a6127f4e9161792d97f13e10bc6
> > no xattr: security.capability
> > calc_evm_hash:532 hmac_misc (24): 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000ed810000
> > hash(sha256): 331e36ce1b32374a22e12df28b58d79536c0ee97ba01451bd60343191c073b55
> > /bin/cat: verification is OK
> > [root@vm demo]# cat
> > -bash: /usr/bin/cat: Permission denied
> > [root@vm demo]#
> >
> > It fails because the actual xattr in the filesystem is:
> >
> > name: security.selinux, size: 26
> > 73797374656d5f753a6f626a6563745f723a62696e5f743a7330
>
> Looking at security/selinux/hooks.c: I'm seeing a
> comment selinux_inode_setxattr() that says:
>
> /* We strip a nul only if it is at the end, otherwise the
> * context contains a nul and we should audit that */
strace shows setxattr is writing 26 bytes:
setxattr("/bin/cat-test", "security.selinux",
"system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0", 26, 0) = 0
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 10:58 vfs_getxattr_alloc() problem Roberto Sassu
2020-04-23 23:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-04-24 14:32 ` Roberto Sassu
2020-04-27 18:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-04-27 19:19 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-04-28 7:02 ` Roberto Sassu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1588015195.16086.3.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).