From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Petr Cervinka <pcervinka@suse.com>,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LTP v2 1/1] ima_tpm.sh: Fix for calculating boot aggregate
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:41:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1590601280.16219.1.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200527071434.28574-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
Hi Petr,
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 09:14 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Fixes test for kernel commit: 6f1a1d103b48 ima: ("Switch to
> ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate") from current linux-integrity tree.
>
> Tests was failing, because it expect SHA1 hash, but for TPM 2.0 is
> now used IMA default hash algorithm (by default default SHA256).
> This is similar for entries in IMA measurement list so we can reuse
> already existing code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> changes v1->v2:
> * removing global variables from get_algorithm_digest (hopefully it's
> less ugly)
>
> Tested only on VM. Can anybody test it on real HW?
With just this change, the ima_tpm.sh test is failing. I assume it is
failing because it is reading the SHA1 TPM bank, not the SHA256 bank
to calculate the boot_aggregate hash.
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA kernel config:
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX=10
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_NG_TEMPLATE=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE="ima-ng"
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH_SHA256=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH="sha256"
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_WRITE_POLICY=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT=y
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: /proc/cmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.6.0-rc3+.signed root=UUID=119f1a79-c391-4e37-905d-3a503284cadb ro quiet splash ima-policy=tcb
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: verify boot aggregate
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: used algorithm: sha256
ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA boot aggregate: 'b2341e4ccea25be7fa750830fb5fdf4bef1c44a4'
ima_tpm 1 TFAIL: bios boot aggregate does not match IMA boot aggregate (3fd5dc717f886ff7182526efc5edc3abb179a5aac1ab589c8ec888398233ae5b)
ima_tpm 2 TINFO: verify PCR values
ima_tpm 2 TINFO: evmctl version: evmctl 1.2
ima_tpm 2 TCONF: TPM Hardware Support not enabled in kernel or no TPM chip found
ima_tpm 3 TINFO: AppArmor enabled, this may affect test results
ima_tpm 3 TINFO: it can be disabled with TST_DISABLE_APPARMOR=1 (requires super/root)
ima_tpm 3 TINFO: loaded AppArmor profiles: none
Summary:
passed 0
failed 1
skipped 1
warnings 0
# head -1 /sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements
10 a3132d2501128ff527171658d40d8deb61e2292b ima-ng
sha256:3fd5dc717f886ff7182526efc5edc3abb179a5aac1ab589c8ec888398233ae5
b boot_aggregate
The ima-evm-utils next-testing branch has code to calculate the
boot_aggregate based on multiple banks.
# evmctl ima_boot_aggregate
sha1:4cf3d105b1a1a41b951cc6431f0801c01fe50b24
sha256:3fd5dc717f886ff7182526efc5edc3abb179a5aac1ab589c8ec888398233ae5b
There's also a new test to verify the boot_aggregate.
$ VERBOSE=1 make check TESTS=boog_aggregate.test
Both need some review and testing before being released.
thanks,
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 7:14 [LTP v2 1/1] ima_tpm.sh: Fix for calculating boot aggregate Petr Vorel
2020-05-27 17:41 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-05-28 14:07 ` Petr Vorel
2020-05-28 15:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-05-28 16:05 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-15 19:41 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-15 20:01 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-16 22:40 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-17 19:52 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-19 7:46 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-15 20:21 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-17 1:21 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-06-17 20:45 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-17 22:19 ` Maurizio Drocco
2020-06-19 8:21 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-19 12:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-19 13:01 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-19 10:07 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-19 13:01 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1590601280.16219.1.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pcervinka@suse.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).