From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Petr Cervinka <pcervinka@suse.com>,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
Subject: Re: [LTP v2 1/1] ima_tpm.sh: Fix for calculating boot aggregate
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 11:19:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1590679145.4457.39.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528140747.GA8401@dell5510>
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 16:07 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
>
> thanks a lot for testing!
>
> > On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 09:14 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Fixes test for kernel commit: 6f1a1d103b48 ima: ("Switch to
> > > ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate") from current linux-integrity tree.
>
> > > Tests was failing, because it expect SHA1 hash, but for TPM 2.0 is
> > > now used IMA default hash algorithm (by default default SHA256).
> > > This is similar for entries in IMA measurement list so we can reuse
> > > already existing code.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > > ---
> > > changes v1->v2:
> > > * removing global variables from get_algorithm_digest (hopefully it's
> > > less ugly)
>
> > > Tested only on VM. Can anybody test it on real HW?
>
> > With just this change, the ima_tpm.sh test is failing. I assume it is
> > failing because it is reading the SHA1 TPM bank, not the SHA256 bank
> > to calculate the boot_aggregate hash.
> First question: is it correct to take sha256? Because on my test below it's
> reading sha1, because that's the content of /sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements
>
> I thought just kernel commit: 6f1a1d103b48 ima: ("Switch to ima_hash_algo for
> boot aggregate") from current linux-integrity tree is needed, but I tested it on
> b59fda449cf0 ("ima: Set again build_ima_appraise variable") (i.e. having all
> Robeto's ima patches, missing just last 2 commits from next-integrity head).
> What is needed to get your setup?
This isn't a configuration problem, but an issue of reading PCRs and
calculating the TPM bank appropriate boot_aggregate. If you're
calculating a sha256 boot_aggregate, then the test needs to read and
calculate the boot_aggregate by reading the SHA256 TPM bank.
> We both have CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH_SHA256=y and CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH="sha256".
>
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA kernel config:
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX=10
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_NG_TEMPLATE=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE="ima-ng"
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH_SHA256=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH="sha256"
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_WRITE_POLICY=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT=y
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: /proc/cmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.6.0-rc3+.signed root=UUID=119f1a79-c391-4e37-905d-3a503284cadb ro quiet splash ima-policy=tcb
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: verify boot aggregate
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: used algorithm: sha256
> > ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA boot aggregate: 'b2341e4ccea25be7fa750830fb5fdf4bef1c44a4'
> > ima_tpm 1 TFAIL: bios boot aggregate does not match IMA boot aggregate (3fd5dc717f886ff7182526efc5edc3abb179a5aac1ab589c8ec888398233ae5b)
> > ima_tpm 2 TINFO: verify PCR values
> > ima_tpm 2 TINFO: evmctl version: evmctl 1.2
> > ima_tpm 2 TCONF: TPM Hardware Support not enabled in kernel or no TPM chip found
> > ima_tpm 3 TINFO: AppArmor enabled, this may affect test results
> > ima_tpm 3 TINFO: it can be disabled with TST_DISABLE_APPARMOR=1 (requires super/root)
> > ima_tpm 3 TINFO: loaded AppArmor profiles: none
>
> > Summary:
> > passed 0
> > failed 1
> > skipped 1
> > warnings 0
>
>
> BTW my results on custom kernel:
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA kernel config:
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX=10
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_NG_TEMPLATE=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE="ima-ng"
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH_SHA256=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH="sha256"
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: /proc/cmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.18-20-default root=/dev/mapper/system-root crashkernel=121M,high crashkernel=72M,low isofrom=/dev/disk/by-uuid/3271-1AD6:/openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-Snapshot20161222-Media.iso isofrom_device=/dev/disk/by-uuid/3271-1AD6 isofrom_system=/openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-Snapshot20161222-Media.iso loader=syslinux quiet resume=/dev/system/swap splash=silent quiet showopts
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA kernel config:
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX=10
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_NG_TEMPLATE=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE="ima-ng"
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH_SHA256=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH="sha256"
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_MODSIG=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_TRUSTED_KEYRING=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: CONFIG_IMA_KEYRINGS_PERMIT_SIGNED_BY_BUILTIN_OR_SECONDARY=y
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: /proc/cmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.3.18-20-default root=/dev/mapper/system-root crashkernel=121M,high crashkernel=72M,low isofrom=/dev/disk/by-uuid/3271-1AD6:/openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-Snapshot20161222-Media.iso isofrom_device=/dev/disk/by-uuid/3271-1AD6 isofrom_system=/openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-Snapshot20161222-Media.iso loader=syslinux quiet resume=/dev/system/swap splash=silent quiet showopts
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: verify boot aggregate
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: used algorithm: sha1
> ima_tpm 1 TINFO: IMA boot aggregate: '1172f0990296510ed39403b4f1de83c82e093aae'
> ima_tpm 1 TPASS: bios boot aggregate matches IMA boot aggregate (1172f0990296510ed39403b4f1de83c82e093aae)
> ima_tpm 2 TINFO: verify PCR values
> ima_tpm 2 TINFO: evmctl version: evmctl 1.2.1
> ima_tpm 2 TINFO: new PCRS path, evmctl >= 1.1 required
> ima_tpm 2 TINFO: verify PCR (Process Control Register)
> ima_tpm 2 TPASS: aggregate PCR value matches real PCR value
>
> Summary:
> passed 2
> failed 0
> skipped 0
> warnings 0
>
>
> > # head -1 /sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements
>
> > 10 a3132d2501128ff527171658d40d8deb61e2292b ima-ng
> > sha256:3fd5dc717f886ff7182526efc5edc3abb179a5aac1ab589c8ec888398233ae5
> > b boot_aggregate
>
> mine:
> 10 c125a1d3684a9737f20f6c1bc880782fae60fb28 ima-ng sha1:1172f0990296510ed39403b4f1de83c82e093aae boot_aggregate
>
> > The ima-evm-utils next-testing branch has code to calculate the
> > boot_aggregate based on multiple banks.
> I see, 696bf0b ("ima-evm-utils: calculate the digests for multiple TPM banks")
> I wonder whether it's reasonable trying to port that to ima_boot_aggregate.c or
> just depend on evmctl. External dependencies are sometimes complicated, but for
> IMA I incline to just require evmctl.
Unlike TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 device driver doesn't export the TPM PCRs.
Not only would you have a dependency on ima-evm-utils, but also on a
userspace application(s) for reading the TPM PCRs. That dependency
exists whether you're using evmctl to calculate the boot_aggregate or
doing it yourself.
>
> > # evmctl ima_boot_aggregate
>
> > sha1:4cf3d105b1a1a41b951cc6431f0801c01fe50b24
> > sha256:3fd5dc717f886ff7182526efc5edc3abb179a5aac1ab589c8ec888398233ae5b
>
> Thus obviously evmctl (from next-testing) also gets only sha1
> ./src/evmctl ima_boot_aggregate
> sha1:1172f0990296510ed39403b4f1de83c82e093aae
>
> > There's also a new test to verify the boot_aggregate.
>
> > $ VERBOSE=1 make check TESTS=boog_aggregate.test
> BTW I got some errors
> ...
> make check-TESTS
> make[2]: Entering directory '/home/foo/ima-evm-utils/tests'
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/foo/ima-evm-utils/tests'
> make[4]: Entering directory '/home/foo/ima-evm-utils/tests'
> make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'boog_aggregate.log'.
> make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/foo/ima-evm-utils/tests'
> fatal: making test-suite.log: failed to create boog_aggregate.trs
> fatal: making test-suite.log: failed to create boog_aggregate.log
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:516: test-suite.log] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/foo/ima-evm-utils/tests'
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:625: check-TESTS] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/foo/ima-evm-utils/tests'
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:692: check-am] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/foo/ima-evm-utils/tests'
> make: *** [Makefile:514: check-recursive] Error 1
[Cc'ing Vitaly]
The boot_aggregate.trs and boot_aggregate.log files are being created
in the tests/ directory. Is that directory read-only?
>
> > Both need some review and testing before being released.
> Any estimation when code is released?
Probably not before the next open window, but definitely before it is
released.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 7:14 [LTP v2 1/1] ima_tpm.sh: Fix for calculating boot aggregate Petr Vorel
2020-05-27 17:41 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-05-28 14:07 ` Petr Vorel
2020-05-28 15:19 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-05-28 16:05 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-15 19:41 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-15 20:01 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-16 22:40 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-17 19:52 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-19 7:46 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-15 20:21 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-17 1:21 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2020-06-17 20:45 ` Bruno Meneguele
2020-06-17 22:19 ` Maurizio Drocco
2020-06-19 8:21 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-19 12:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-19 13:01 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-19 10:07 ` Petr Vorel
2020-06-19 13:01 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1590679145.4457.39.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pcervinka@suse.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=vt@altlinux.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).