From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
patrickc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] tpm: reduce polling delay in tpm_tis wait_for_tpm_stat()
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:17:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012111726.7dhos7bfgywqytbz@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004102924.12355-4-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 06:29:22AM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> The existing wait_for_tpm_stat() polls for the chip status after
> 5msec sleep. As per TCG ddwg input, it is expected that tpm might
> return status in few usec. So, reducing the delay in polling to
> 1msec.
>
> After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte
> burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~14sec to ~10sec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 8da425e1783f..224842e06105 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> #include "tpm.h"
> #include "tpm_tis_core.h"
>
> +#define TPM_POLL_SLEEP 1
Should have a comment above that explains the choice.
> +
> static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> bool check_cancel, bool *canceled)
> {
> @@ -82,7 +84,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> }
> } else {
> do {
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> + tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
> status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> if ((status & mask) == mask)
> return 0;
> --
> 2.13.3
>
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 10:29 [PATCH v3 0/4] additional TPM performance improvements Nayna Jain
2017-10-04 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] tpm: move wait_for_tpm_stat() to respective driver files Nayna Jain
2017-10-10 14:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-04 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance Nayna Jain
2017-10-10 15:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-11 11:29 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-04 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] tpm: reduce polling delay in tpm_tis wait_for_tpm_stat() Nayna Jain
2017-10-12 11:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2017-10-04 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] tpm: reduce tpm_msleep() time in get_burstcount() Nayna Jain
2017-10-12 11:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-12 13:14 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-04 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] tpm: use tpm_msleep() value as max delay Nayna Jain
2017-10-12 11:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171012111726.7dhos7bfgywqytbz@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=patrickc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).