From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
patrickc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:24:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171018152447.b6scwbbmulrfzymw@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171017203232.2262-4-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> The existing wait_for_tpm_stat() polls for the chip status after
> 5msec sleep. As per TCG ddwg input, it is expected that tpm might
> return status in few usec. So, reducing the delay in polling to
> 1msec.
> Similarly, get_burstcount() function sleeps for 5msec before
> retrying for next query to burstcount in a loop. If it takes
> lesser time for TPM to return, this 5msec delay is longer than
> necessary.
>
> After this change, performance on a TPM 1.2 with an 8 byte
> burstcount for 1000 extends improved from ~14sec to ~9sec.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
/Jarkko
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 993328ae988c..8b55fdaa67f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@
> #include "tpm.h"
> #include "tpm_tis_core.h"
>
> +/* This is a polling delay to check for status and burstcount.
> + * As per ddwg input, expectation is that status check and burstcount
> + * check should return within few usecs.
> + */
> +#define TPM_POLL_SLEEP 1 /* msec */
> +
> static bool wait_for_tpm_stat_cond(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> bool check_cancel, bool *canceled)
> {
> @@ -82,7 +88,7 @@ static int wait_for_tpm_stat(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 mask,
> }
> } else {
> do {
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> + tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
> status = chip->ops->status(chip);
> if ((status & mask) == mask)
> return 0;
> @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static int get_burstcount(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> burstcnt = (value >> 8) & 0xFFFF;
> if (burstcnt)
> return burstcnt;
> - tpm_msleep(TPM_TIMEOUT);
> + tpm_msleep(TPM_POLL_SLEEP);
> } while (time_before(jiffies, stop));
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> --
> 2.13.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 20:32 [PATCH v4 0/4] additional TPM performance improvements Nayna Jain
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] tpm: move wait_for_tpm_stat() to respective driver files Nayna Jain
2017-10-19 14:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 17:00 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-20 8:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-23 13:32 ` Nayna Jain
2017-10-24 13:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance Nayna Jain
2017-10-18 15:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-19 14:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-20 14:42 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-10-20 18:02 ` Ken Goldman
2017-10-23 2:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-07 18:29 ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-08 11:32 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-16 14:34 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-22 6:52 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-23 14:47 ` Nayna Jain
2017-11-23 16:19 ` Alexander.Steffen
2017-11-26 15:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-26 16:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-27 7:08 ` Leendert van Doorn
2017-11-27 13:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-11-28 20:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: reduce tpm polling delay in tpm_tis_core Nayna Jain
2017-10-18 15:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2017-10-19 14:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-10-17 20:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] tpm: use tpm_msleep() value as max delay Nayna Jain
2017-10-19 14:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171018152447.b6scwbbmulrfzymw@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=patrickc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).