Re: [PATCH] tpm: Update MAINTAINERS for Jason Gunthorpe

Peter Huewe
2017-11-08T09:27:49Z

Am 8. November 2017 07:36:40 MEZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>:
>On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 05:03:56PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:05:49PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Am 3. November 2017 15:28:41 MEZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen
><jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>:
>> > >On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:23:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> > >> My email address for open source work is moving to this new
>permanent
>> > >> personal address.
>> > >>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@ziepe.ca>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>> > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >>
>> > >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> > >> index 6671f375f7fcdd..b79eb071475ffc 100644
>> > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> > >> @@ -13588,7 +13588,7 @@ TPM DEVICE DRIVER
>> > >> M: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
>> > >> M: Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>
>> > >> M: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> -R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
>> > >> +R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
>> > >> W: http://tpmdd.sourceforge.net
>> > >> L: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net (moderated for
>non-subscribers)
>> > >> Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/tpmdd-devel/list/
>> > >> --
>> > >> 2.7.4
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
>> > >
>> > >Should these updates go to my tree? I posted previous update to
>> > >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org.
>> > Which equals /dev/null for most cases.
>> >
>> > Why shouldn'tit go through your tree?
>> > It's a maintainers update for your subsystem - and you did it in
>the past when modifying the urls.
>> >
>> > >/Jarkko
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from my mobile
>>
>> I applied two patches to my tree.
>>
>> /Jarkko
>
>NAK
>
NAK what?
Who/what do you nak to?

>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org is missing *completely*. It should be at
>minimum in the CC field.
>
>My previous update did not go through my tree. I misread your original
>response to say that I should put also URL update to my tree. I did.
>It resulted a merge conflict.
>
I do not understand what you are saying.
Please rephrase/clarify.

>Updating that file goes out of my territory other than acking the
>updates.
Imho not really, since there is no MAINTAINERS maintainer.
If you feel uncomfortable with adding the changes to MAINTAINERS via your tree, please ask James to pull them up - just as Mimi did for her linux-integrity update.

>Now that linux-kernel is missing this completely unacceptable.
>

>/Jarkko

--
Sent from my mobile