From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:49525 "EHLO mail-io0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752680AbdKHWYg (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 17:24:36 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n137so7686757iod.6 for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:24:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:24:34 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Peter Huewe Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Update MAINTAINERS for Jason Gunthorpe Message-ID: <20171108222434.GF7063@ziepe.ca> References: <20171031202357.GA1030@ziepe.ca> <20171103142841.2nphkjojzamrdezm@linux.intel.com> <0812DDC3-187D-4F29-BFB5-9A4F509CA376@gmx.de> <20171107150356.uln3lks64zt5oxjv@linux.intel.com> <20171108063640.kxwag6fzguetpjnf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:27:37AM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > >Updating that file goes out of my territory other than acking the > >updates. > Imho not really, since there is no MAINTAINERS maintainer. If you > feel uncomfortable with adding the changes to MAINTAINERS via your > tree, please ask James to pull them up - just as Mimi did for her > linux-integrity update. Agreed, if you are submitting pull requests then the MAINTAINERS update for TPM related things should go into your pull request. That is appropriate.. It isn't necessary for everything to be cc'd everywhere, ultimately it is your responsibility as the TPM maintainer to accept/reject this change. If it was a larger change, like adding/removing a maintainer then a large audiance would be appropriate, but this is just changing spelling and the patch was PGP signed .. Jason