public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	Philip Tricca <philip.b.tricca@intel.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	William Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:17:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171117181734.GM4276@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f4e7c86-ef04-ea41-892f-1183a1d44a7b@redhat.com>

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:10:09PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

> Right, that's what I understood indeed but wanted to be sure. The problem with
> that approach is that would not scale.
> 
> Since this particular TPM2 doesn't have support for the TPM2_EncryptDecrypt2
> command, but some chips may not support others commands.

No, tpm_validate is not supposed to be sensitive to what commands the
TPM supports. It is only supposed to check if the command passed is
fully understood by the kernel and is properly formed.

This is to prevent rouge user space from sending garbage or privileged
commands to the TPM.

If it is refusing TPM2_EncryptDecrypt2, and that command is safe to
use in the spaces system, then tpm_validate must learn how to handle
it, or userspace can never use it.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-17 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-17 10:07 [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-17 16:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-17 17:56   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-17 17:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-17 18:10       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-17 18:17         ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2017-11-17 18:34           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-17 19:14             ` Roberts, William C
2017-11-17 23:55               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-18  0:53                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-19 15:27                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-20  9:26                     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-20 16:14                       ` Roberts, William C
2017-11-20 18:02                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-20 18:04                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-12-08 20:03           ` Ken Goldman
2017-12-08 20:18             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-12-08 19:58   ` Ken Goldman
2017-11-20 23:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-21  9:07   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-21  9:27     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-21 12:30     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-21 12:49       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
     [not found]         ` <DB638850A6A2434A93ECADDA0BC838905F09D5D9@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
2017-11-22 17:16           ` FW: " flihp
2017-11-22 19:25             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-26 14:21               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-29 11:26                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-22 20:13             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-12-08 20:16               ` Ken Goldman
2017-12-08 20:20                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 14:18             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-26 23:23               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-26 14:14         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-21 20:29       ` Roberts, William C
2017-11-22  9:26         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-11-26 14:12           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-26 23:19             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-12-08 20:11           ` Ken Goldman
2017-11-26 14:06         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 20:20           ` Ken Goldman
2017-12-08 21:34             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-12-17 16:47               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-17 18:18                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2017-12-22 17:38                 ` Ken Goldman
2017-12-14 13:11             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 19:51 ` Ken Goldman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171117181734.GM4276@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=philip.b.tricca@intel.com \
    --cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox