From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
Andrey Pronin <apronin@chromium.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Add explicit chip->ops locking for sysfs attributes.
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:45:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171120224523.GA26294@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120221323.252ki4nmmrymnty6@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:13:23AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:25:01PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Add explicit chip->ops locking for all sysfs attributes.
> > This lets us support those attributes on tpm2 devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 4 --
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> I think the patch looks ok (with a quick skim) as code change. We need
> it. It should have been already done. Thanks for doing this.
>
> I don't digest the commit message.
>
> You should just to explain why this change needs to be done in order to
> support sysfs attributes with TPM 2.0 devices and not speculate how it
> will be used in future commits.
>
How about the following ?
"tpm: Enable sysfs support for TPM2 devices
Access to chip->ops on TPM2 devices requires an explicit lock,
since the pointer is set to NULL in tpm_class_shutdown().
Implement that lock for sysfs access functions and enable sysfs
support for TPM2 devices."
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 21:25 [PATCH] tpm: Add explicit chip->ops locking for sysfs attributes Guenter Roeck
2017-11-20 22:13 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-20 22:45 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2017-11-20 23:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-20 23:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-21 18:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-11-21 18:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 13:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-27 16:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-11-28 20:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-11-20 23:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171120224523.GA26294@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=apronin@chromium.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).