From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:60633 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752162AbdKZOOL (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Nov 2017 09:14:11 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 16:14:07 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Javier Martinez Canillas , James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe , Philip Tricca , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, William Roberts Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails Message-ID: <20171126141407.mdgabnlxu6ycc65b@linux.intel.com> References: <20171117100724.19257-1-javierm@redhat.com> <20171120231512.6wpqgcggfta3am7m@linux.intel.com> <7c148cf0-2403-55cf-1633-ff326d5c6f7b@redhat.com> <20171121123006.esr7yxs5lvorlfjf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:49:23PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Ok. Thanks a lot for your feedback. I already had that patch but didn't want > to post it before knowing your opinion, I'll drop it now. > > Philip, > > I think this means that we can now fix this in user-space then? That was in > fact my first suggestion in the filed tpm2-tools issue. Thanks for anyway putting that patch out. I'll investigate it with time and reconsider my position. Philip, can you share your view. Adding also James. /Jarkko