* IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
@ 2017-12-01 18:15 Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-01 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dmitry.kasatkin, zohar; +Cc: linux-integrity
[-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 694 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-01 18:15 IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Bruno E. O. Meneguele
@ 2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, dmitry.kasatkin; +Cc: linux-integrity
On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils
> 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of
> distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining
> compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available
> in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then
> removed completely.
>
> Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to
> maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys
> have interest on it? I could post it as a patch.
>
> Thanks!
Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM
portable signature support as well.
thanks,
Mimi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
@ 2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mimi Zohar; +Cc: dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
[-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 1117 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
@ 2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-04 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:14 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> On 04-12, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils
> > > 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of
> > > distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining
> > > compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available
> > > in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then
> > > removed completely.
> > >
> > > Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to
> > > maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys
> > > have interest on it? I could post it as a patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM
> > portable signature support as well.
> >
>
> Perfect! should I post with some different subject prefix or something
> like that to let things clear that is a patch for the userspace app?
In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the
subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:",
"evm:", "tpm:").
Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg.
"ima-evm-utils:").
Jarkko, is that ok?
Mimi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
@ 2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2017-12-07 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mimi Zohar; +Cc: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:18:26PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the
> subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:",
> "evm:", "tpm:").
>
> Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg.
> "ima-evm-utils:").
>
> Jarkko, is that ok?
It is fine for me.
/Jarkko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-07 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: Mimi Zohar, dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity
[-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 625 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-07 12:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-01 18:15 IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox