From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:53142 "EHLO mga07.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752134AbdLGBLJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 6 Dec 2017 20:11:09 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 03:11:05 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Bruno E. O. Meneguele" <brdeoliv@redhat.com>,
        dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update
Message-ID: <20171207011105.bfqhvjanl3arhqqn@linux.intel.com>
References: <20171201181522.GB3056@glitch>
 <1512392157.3977.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20171204171435.GA6190@glitch>
 <1512415106.3977.53.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <1512415106.3977.53.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:18:26PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the
> subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:",
> "evm:", "tpm:").
> 
> Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg.
> "ima-evm-utils:").
> 
> Jarkko, is that ok?

It is fine for me.

/Jarkko