* IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update @ 2017-12-01 18:15 Bruno E. O. Meneguele 2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-01 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dmitry.kasatkin, zohar; +Cc: linux-integrity [-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 694 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update 2017-12-01 18:15 IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, dmitry.kasatkin; +Cc: linux-integrity On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > Hi folks, > > I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils > 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of > distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining > compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available > in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then > removed completely. > > Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to > maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys > have interest on it? I could post it as a patch. > > Thanks! Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM portable signature support as well. thanks, Mimi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update 2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele 2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mimi Zohar; +Cc: dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity [-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 1117 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update 2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-04 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:14 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > On 04-12, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils > > > 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of > > > distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining > > > compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available > > > in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then > > > removed completely. > > > > > > Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to > > > maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys > > > have interest on it? I could post it as a patch. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM > > portable signature support as well. > > > > Perfect! should I post with some different subject prefix or something > like that to let things clear that is a patch for the userspace app? In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:", "evm:", "tpm:"). Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg. "ima-evm-utils:"). Jarkko, is that ok? Mimi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update 2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar @ 2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2017-12-07 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mimi Zohar; +Cc: Bruno E. O. Meneguele, dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:18:26PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the > subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:", > "evm:", "tpm:"). > > Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg. > "ima-evm-utils:"). > > Jarkko, is that ok? It is fine for me. /Jarkko ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update 2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Bruno E. O. Meneguele @ 2017-12-07 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: Mimi Zohar, dmitry.kasatkin, linux-integrity [-- Attachment #1: Type: multipart/signed, Size: 625 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-07 12:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-12-01 18:15 IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update Bruno E. O. Meneguele 2017-12-04 12:55 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-12-04 17:14 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele 2017-12-04 19:18 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-12-07 1:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen 2017-12-07 12:19 ` Bruno E. O. Meneguele
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox