public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>
Cc: nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/9] tpm_tis_spi: fix sending wrong data during wait state handling
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:26:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118182657.knnxk25bc2v5cefw@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171208184658.9588-7-Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:46:55PM +0100, Alexander Steffen wrote:
> When the TPM signals wait states, the driver has to repeat the last byte
> until the TPM stops signaling wait states and accepts that byte. It should
> not send a dummy byte, even though that might work with some TPM
> implementations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> index c4f511b..2758b41 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> @@ -88,9 +88,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
>  
>  		if ((phy->iobuf[3] & 0x01) == 0) {
>  			// handle SPI wait states
> -			phy->iobuf[0] = 0;
> -
>  			for (i = 0; i < TPM_RETRY; i++) {
> +				phy->iobuf[0] = addr;

Why it has to be moved inside the loop?

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-18 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-08 18:46 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] tpm: fix driver so that burstcount can be safely ignored Alexander Steffen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] tpm_tis_core: clean up whitespace Alexander Steffen
2018-01-18 17:11   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9] tpm_tis_core: access single TIS registers before doing complex transfers Alexander Steffen
2018-01-18 17:16   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] tpm_tis_core: correctly wait for flags to become zero Alexander Steffen
2018-01-18 17:49   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-01-18 17:58   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-01-18 17:59     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] tpm_tis_core: send all data in single operation Alexander Steffen
2017-12-19  9:01   ` Nayna Jain
2018-01-18 18:04   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] tpm_tis_core: use XDATA_FIFO for transfers if available Alexander Steffen
2018-01-18 18:20   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] tpm_tis_spi: fix sending wrong data during wait state handling Alexander Steffen
2018-01-18 18:26   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] tpm_tis_spi: release CS line when wait state handling fails Alexander Steffen
2018-01-18 18:30   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9] tpm_tis_spi: add delay between wait state retries Alexander Steffen
2018-01-11 19:46   ` Mimi Zohar
2018-01-12  8:28     ` Alexander Steffen
2018-01-12 14:53       ` Mimi Zohar
2018-01-15 22:30       ` Mimi Zohar
2018-01-17 17:15         ` Mimi Zohar
2018-01-17 18:58           ` Alexander Steffen
2018-01-18 18:32   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-08 18:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance Alexander Steffen
2017-12-15 12:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/9] tpm: fix driver so that burstcount can be safely ignored Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-24 20:41   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-01-04 13:11     ` Alexander.Steffen
2018-01-05  6:46       ` Nayna Jain
2018-01-05  7:38         ` Alexander Steffen
2018-01-08 10:50           ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-01-08 10:49       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2017-12-19  8:53 ` Nayna Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180118182657.knnxk25bc2v5cefw@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com \
    --cc=kgold@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox