From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:10587 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751498AbeAWNMI (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 08:12:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:12:03 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Tomas Winkler Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Alexander Usyskin , tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tpm: add longer timeouts for creation commands. Message-ID: <20180123131203.bdhlqdqabhtwnipi@linux.intel.com> References: <20180123112731.3687-1-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <20180123112731.3687-3-tomas.winkler@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180123112731.3687-3-tomas.winkler@intel.com> Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > TPM2_CC_Create(0x153) and TPM2_CC_CreatePrimary (0x131) involve generation > of crypto keys which can be a computationally intensive task. > The timeout is set to 3min. > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler >>From where are these numbers are derived from? Can you send 1/3 and 2/3 as a separate patch set with a cover letter (with explanation) and this as a separate patch? This is unrelated to first two changes albeit might make sense. /Jarkko